First you should consider the difference between a healthy monitor and an unhealthy monitor.
Then you should consider, the natural qualities of a varanid mouth. In the last couple of years, its come to lite that varanids and many other, normally considered harmless reptiles, such as kingsnakes and such, have toxins/venoms. This saliva contains such things as crotamines(named after rattlesnake venom) But of course at much lover levels and most likely not as toxic.
Of course all mouths contain bacteria. In most cases, this flora or fauna(which is it?), is considered normal and if of actual value. In many cases its important in digestion.
So the question becomes what is normal and what is not normal.
In the case of reptiles(snakes), its known from the past that poor husbandry causes such things as mouth rot(bacterial infections in the mouth) These infections are normally caused by "common" bacteria. What seems to allow this common bacteria to become deleterious, is a compromised immune system. Prolonged stress, causes reptiles to lose a functioning immune system.
To the point, I wonder what is the range of bacteria in a Komodos mouth based on overall health. As far as I know, most of the cultures were done on captive KD's or on wild ones in a park situation. These were fed goats and were attacted to food and often overabundant. I wonder if those were actually healthy monitors? Please understand, I am not saying healthy KD's do not contain more harmful bacteria then other monitors. I just wonder if the tests were actually varied. In lite on this new information that varanids carry actual venom, a KD may well be able to down its prey with venom, and not bacteria, as previously thought.
Keep in mind, many of these things we are taught about monitors occur from a very small amount of information. In many cases, one test, or in this case one/a few, cultures. The question is, was that a sick KD's or a healthy ones? For instance, what is the flora of a fast growing neonate KD? It would be of interest to test both a wild neonate and captive ones. Ones of known health. Those results would be interesting.
The reason I ask this is, in my own experience with indo monitors. You can control the bacteria in the mouth with simple husbandry. For instance, bleeding gums is common on unhealthy indo monitors. This bleeding gums was and my still be thought to be normal.
In fact, the person your talking to, told me it was normal. He visited me and I showed him a pair of indicus that had bleeding gums. To make the story short, they eventually died from that. So whenever I kept indo monitors from that point on, If I saw bleeding gums, I checked my husbandry and made improvements. Then the bleeding would simply go away. Its was my experience it was caused by stress, much like mouthrot in snakes. This stress is from both improper conditions and unsuitable social arrangements. Once those areas were addressed, the bleeding gums disappeared and a normal bacterial flora returned to their mouths.
I also noted that wild indo monitors such as Blacktrees had very high bacteria loads in their mouths and claws. A tiny puncture or bite would cause a very fast infection. But once they were in captivity a short time, and became healthy, this went completely away. To a point of bites and claw scratches did not cause any infection. This is not the same exact individuals.
I wonder about KD's. Remember, I do not care what the answer is, as it does not matter one way or the other, I just get a nagging feeling this overabundance of oral bacteria is caused by stress. Their actual venom is by design. Cheers