Yes, everything you say is true, as far as I can tell.
I too am a professional; I am a medical doctor and hold degrees in a few disciplines. I have been breeding snakes since 1968, with the exception of the thirteen years I was at university. Even then I did keep a few snakes and lizards.
In the late 70’s my best ball python came down with a scale fungus and was shocked to learn that very little was known about the treatment of disease in snakes or most reptiles at the time. I did find out that if anyone knew how to treat my snake it would be found in the research being done at the University at Gainesville, school veterinary medicine. So I worked with the staff, which was then doing research into the treatment of disease in birds. Too many people had been complaining that the expensive exotic birds they had, when taken to the local vet, they were being told that these vets only new about farm live stock or dogs and cats. The University was pioneering research into bird care to fill this need.
What I found when work with them on my ball's problem was that reptiles and birds shared a common trait nucleated blood and the germs that infected birds were generally gram-negative and most of the germs that infected people and other animals were gram-positive. It was suggested that the pharmacology for birds may then work for snakes as well?
Alas, it was too late for my ball. Yet many of the other treatments for birds did in fact work for reptiles and much that we use today was first worked through for birds.
In my teens I was a quasi-professional herpetologist and was considering it as a profession. I was registered with the State as a research herpetologist and did field research with actual professionals and was allowed to work with teams in closed State parks doing field counts of snakes coming out of hibernation. Herpetologists, counted scales in regions of the snakes’body, did differential bone analyses of cranial structure and put specimens in jars of preservatives. Most of what was known at that time about snakes came from German work; even today the Germans have a strong body of work into the keeping of snakes. Yet very little documented research is available even today that supports the keeping of snakes and the treatment of their disease. Even today herpetologists do much the same. Little that we need as snake breeders comes from professional academic herpetlogists, other than taxonomy. So who do we believe?
Yes, UV light is a gray area in snakes, other reptiles need UV light due to their diet, and snakes get what other reptiles lack from the rodents they eat. So, snakes can live without UV light. Many of the breeders of tree boas and pythons that I know do sun their snakes. We breeders are way to busy with the basic care of our stock to waist time on something that has no value. UV light does intensify the color of lizards, how much it does affect snakes I do not know?
I do know that many diet manufactures for some reptiles, birds and fish do have color enhancing formulas. These formulas can have a dramatic effect on some animals. Just as snakes do not need UV light due to the animals they eat supplying what they need, they may also get some benefit from rodents feed diets high in supplements that support color?
When I get rodents from certain breeders [I am always looking for the best deals, we breed 54 types of snakes, so food costs are our biggest expense.] I have noted that some breeders produce rodents that make my snakes less vibrant and duller in color than other breeders. The best breeders advertise that they use high quality food and supplement the rodents’diets. I can say it works and there is a difference.
We Doctors use some treatments not approved for in humans. We do so because it works. Just because no trials have documented and have been approved yet, does not mean it cannot work. True, we must be very careful not to do something that will harm our patients and documented trials and approved uses does reduce the risks, yet experience and trial and error does play a role too. Just as you cannot believe everything in print, you cannot exclude everything that has not been academically supported too.
With very little time to devote to boards like this one, I apologize for the quick off the top of my head advice. My intent is to impart what I know and have learned and not to do the same diligence that I would when I publish and have the time to check the sources and spelling [spelling is a weak area for me; my mind works faster than my fingers]. I do believe what I have posted to be true in spirit and hope it may help others who have not been at this as long as I have. What works for one person may or may not work for everyone there are too many variables in husbandry for everything to work the same for everyone.