Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here to visit Classifieds
Southwestern Center for Herpetological Research
Click here for Dragon Serpents

moonglow x moonglow?????

hawiiangecko Sep 15, 2006 03:12 PM

what would come bout by this pairing or is noone sure yet. just curious
-----
1.2 leopard geckos1.0 jungle carpet python
1.1 columbian BCI

Replies (17)

vcaruso15 Sep 15, 2006 03:18 PM

25% snow
50% moonglow
25% super moonglow
most likely you will not be able to tell the difference between a moonglow and a super making 75% of the litter possible super moonglows.

shot Sep 16, 2006 02:06 PM

There should not be any snows in a moonglow to moonglow litter because both moonglows are also hypos and a hypo to hypo breeding produces all hypos, some supers and no normals. I dont no what a mg to mg would produce but I know there should not be any snows in the litter.

Marcus

vcaruso15 Sep 16, 2006 04:46 PM

a Hypo x Hypo breeding assuming neither are supers will produce:
25% Normal
25% Super Hypos
50% Hypos
Get your facts strait. Vinnie

shot Sep 16, 2006 09:21 PM

Hypo x Hypo will not produce any normals just hypos and supers. Ask around or do some more research. I am not here to argue with you, just trying to help you out.

Marcus Williams

Trueredtails Sep 16, 2006 09:37 PM

you are mistaken. The only way you could get all hypos from hypo to hypo breeding is if one of the hypos is a super. Ask the question to the whole forum and see the responces. Later

-Dylan
-----
True Redtails

ChrisGilbert Sep 16, 2006 10:09 PM

You get 25% normal, 50% het. and 25% homozygous.

So with Hypos:
25% Wild Type
50% Hypo
25% Super Hypo

If one of the Hypos (or both) in the Hypo X Hypo pair was a Super (Homozygous) you would not get any normals.

Vinnie is correct.

shot Sep 16, 2006 10:30 PM

I will ask the forum and if I am mistaken I apologize to Vinnie but I am sure that I am right.

Marcus Williams

vcaruso15 Sep 17, 2006 11:19 AM

The following was copyed and pasted directly from geneticswizard.com check it out some time you could learn alot from it. Hope this helps you understand Vinnie

The Genetics Wizard's Answer, 1 Genetic Trait
Het. is Heterozygous. WT is Without Trait or Wild Type.
Het. Hypo"d"
x
Het. Hypo"d"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

25% WT
50% Het. Hypo"d"
25% Homozygous Hypo"d"

"d"= trait you marked as Dominant (homozygous
and heterozygous forms look alike)

Trueredtails Sep 15, 2006 04:52 PM

you would get a whole litter of stillborns with no eyes.
-----
True Redtails

locolizard Sep 15, 2006 08:20 PM

I seriously doubt they would be stillborn with no eyes....Thanks for your input though.

Trueredtails Sep 15, 2006 09:11 PM

maybe they will have legs?
-----
True Redtails

vcaruso15 Sep 16, 2006 03:22 PM

Maybe they will be super cool peak freaks!!!

Trueredtails Sep 16, 2006 06:44 PM

LOL a white boa with big peaks would be awesome
-----
True Redtails

vcaruso15 Sep 16, 2006 06:52 PM

I'm sure its only a matter of time. Hopefully we will be around to see it. Later V

ChrisGilbert Sep 16, 2006 10:12 PM

with the RIGHT Anery, could do it.

Original Sharp lines have very strong patterns, large blocky saddles, and small (but present) widows peaks. I say original, because depending how a breeder selectively bred his/her line, they may have smaller and/or more concave saddles.

Of course, we could just wait until someone is able to get that WC. Suriname Albino to breed!

I do want a Snow with widows peaks!!!

slithering_serpents Sep 17, 2006 12:10 AM

n/p

hawiiangecko Sep 17, 2006 10:44 PM

perhaps a strong protruding chin?
-----
1.2 leopard geckos1.0 jungle carpet python
1.1 columbian BCI

Site Tools