The cal king industry needs to be uniform in the labeling aspect.
We can go to one extreme and call them all hypomelanistics with albino on one end and melanistic on the other. But we don't do that.
We are pretty fixed on what is: albino, hypermelanistic (Davis, Mendota, Baja, Chocolate Banana etc..), Ghost-although I think that name misrepresents, Blue-Eyed Blondes, and Lavenders....
To me a Lavender (a recessive gene) describes what a snake looks like, the color lavender. Before I came along there were other recessive genes (not compatible) that were also called "Lavender". Hence the confusion today. And they are not compatible, hence they should have different, non-confusing labels.
What needs to happen is for the cal king industry to establish a standard on description names, at least for the recessive genes. "Ghost" is confusing because Ghost in other species refers to something else. "Snow" is incorrect as in other species it is a combination of anery/amel.
As more cal kings start to display 2, 3 and more recesiive genes at the same time - what are they going to be called?
There are probably up to 10 different single recessive genes in cal kings today. The Blizzard displays two of these (albino & hypermelanistic). Do a matrix chart and see all of the possibilites. I've been working on some of those for a few years now.
Kerby...
-----
Lonesome Valley Reptiles
www.lonesomevalleyreptiles.com
Specializing In California Kingsnakes