Sorry for the late reply, Frank. Things have been busy and I have been trying to formulate a response in my head before writing it out. Unfortunately I really have not come up with much since most of my research has been done on diet and other captive husbandry type issues. I can provide the following for thought...
-Honeybees can learn the smell of their beekeeper as a familiar, nonthreatening entity, and they can pass down this information to subsequent generations. Honeybees are being born on a continuous basis, and somehow they know that the beekeeper is not a threat despite a complete lack of personal exposure to the beekeeper. I learned this when I was the beekeeper about 20 years ago, and at the time they did not have a mechanism for the scent to be passed down to other generations. Admittedly, there are not too many parallels between honeybees and hognoses, but it does show that this phenomenon is present in animal systems.
- There would be a huge evolutionary advantage to plastic diet specialization. For instance, if a snake were a diet generalist but happened to be in an area with dense amphibian concentrations and subsequently thrived off of the abundance of amphibians, it stands to reason that if that snake's progeny also had an affinity for amphibians, then the next generation would also benefit from the amphibian diet. Perhaps a specialized diet turns on specific genes that predisposes its progeny to the same specialized diet. This would not require a mutation or change in the genotype, but merely a turning on and off of particular genes that enables an individual to take full advantage of local resources. I would like to point out that during embryonic development, the young would positively be exposed to the metabolic byproducts of a specialized diet in the bloodstream feeding the embryo. ****
Although it is not quite the same, it reminds me of the advantages of asexual reproduction in plants. Many plants clone themselves which has a huge advantage if the particular habitat of the parent is growing in is ideal. Because the habitat is ideal, the parent plant obviously has the right combination of genes to take advantage of the resources in the habitat. Why waste energy on sexual reproduction and different combinations of genes that may actually reduce the fitness of the progeny? Of course habitats change, so sexual reproduction is still necessary for the long-term success of the species. But in the short-term, when a particular resource is abundant, being as close as possible to the parent would increase the chances of survival.
**** The above is just a wild conjecture on my part. I may have gotten an A in genetics, it doesn't mean my name is Watson or Crick!!!
-----
Virginia Herping
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VaHS
Virginia Herpetological Society online store
http://www.cafepress.com/vaherpsociety
"The irrational fear of snakes is the only excuse a grown man has... to act like a complete sissy" - Colchicine