Rivas’s work is definitely worth the read if you are truly interested in the natural history of green anacondas. The study was published as his Ph.D. dissertation at the University of Tennessee and was submitted in May of 2000. It is about 300 pages and is by far the most extensive study I have ever seen conducted on a large constrictor species. Dirksen has also done much work with anacondas and published a book on them a few years ago. Unfortunately, it has yet to be translated into english.
You are correct in that male greens are much lighter in build than females, but from my experience it does not become really apparent until their second or third year. This is mainly due to the fact that the males and females are growing at a similar rate in the beginning, and the females are not adding much additional mass over the first couple of years. It has been found that the sexual size dimorphism with Eunectes murinus is one of the largest of all vertebrates. As you stated, there have been some larger than average females found in the southern Colombian, and northern Peru area. The rivers in this area are all part of the Amazon River basin. The southern areas of the Amazon Basin in Brazil, has also produced some large female greens as well. The highly suspect, long standing record green was taken on the Meta River in western Colombia in the late 1930’s. The reported 37.5 feet measurement is generally no longer accepted as several of the facts in the story cannot be confirmed. From the available information, it is now widely thought that this female was actually in the 25 to 26 foot range.
As far as captive breeding affecting pattern expression in snakes, I agree that this is quite true with snakes that are commonly bred in captivity. However, with green anacondas, captive breeding is so rare at this point that it has not become much of a problem with them yet (excluding murinus X notaeus intergrades). Additionally, from personal communication with venders, it appears that at least 95% of all greens advertised as captive born are actually produced from gravid, wild caught females. In these cases, the genetic integrity of the young is obviously still intact. The ocular stripe coloration you speak of is a debated concept by many, but I have looked at probably close to a hundred photos of greens from know localities, and have noticed that the greens from the northern parts of the range, of the Orinoco River basin, almost always have the clear, bright yellow or orange ocular stripe typically well outlined in black. Specimens from the southern part of the range, mainly the Amazon River basin, shown an ocular stripe as either faintly orange and highly diffused with the background color, or composed almost entirely of the background color. Many times these are also missing all or part of the upper black outline marking. While ocular stripe coloration is probably not 100% accurate as far as geographic origin, I believe it to be a strong indicator.
I have attached below a couple of photos of adult female greens I currently have in my collection. The upper photo is of a 15 foot female that showns the orange ocular stripe of an older (10 years) mature female. The lower photo is of a younger (5 years) about 13 foot female, and shows the type of ocular stripe which is composed entirely of the background coloration. Both of this younger females parents showed the same background coloration of the ocular. Also, if you can, I would be interested to see a head photo of your young green. Thanks,
Kelly

