Posted by: don shores at Thu Nov 9 18:08:28 2006 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ]
I think when you start questioning the genetics of an animal it puts the question mark on that morph. How would you feel if people brought up hybrids when you were coming out with new brooks morphs like peanut butter brooks and jelly brooks.
Don,
People HAVE questioned the PB morphs. This forum is a place for such debate. Sorry I did not mean to step on your toes. Besiders a post before this you were dissapointed knowbody said anything about your pic. Did you just expect us to Ohh and AHH and have no intelligent dicussion?
When people questioned the Peanut Butter morphs and other new morphs I have I gave the history. The PB morph is also the first codom king, so its in a class of its own (meaning it could not have borrowed genes). But other morphs of mine and other peoples have been discussed here.
Thats what we do on these forums and what they are for. Thees forums, at there best, are a place for both novice and expert alike to obtain FACTS which will help further their own herpetological efforts.
At least you should be happy that these snakes are being mentioned and that they are getting the attention they need. Did you expect that all snakes be accepted as pure just because a breeder says so? Because many a breeder, who has been more prolific than you, has unkowningly sold the herp world fake-hybridized morphs because of shady backround. Today, some of these morphs have been responsible for the decline in the colubrid market that we presently have today.
IMO your axanthic and other splendida morphs will either rise in popularity or fall because they did not stand up to the scrutiny of others. If they are pure (uncrossed)locale kings, then you have nothing to worry about or hide.