I'm not saying if it's legal it's right. I'm not saying if it's illegal it's wrong.
I'm not saying dealers don't do stupid things. I've personally seen and verbally admonished dealers for selling hots to minors, telling a college aged kid but obvious non-herper that a black and white spitter is 'a great first hot' and a few other stupid moves.
I'm basing my reply on the information given in the post.
If someone wanted a venomous snake from me, I've always followed this rule of thumb:
If it is 1. legal for them to own 2. do they already own at least one venomous snake 3. can they tell me the latin name and what antivenin is used for the bite of that particular animal.
If all three of those fall into place, then sure, I would have sold that guy a snake. From Al's post it sounds like he would have easily walked away from any table with a snake.
My point is that no *thing* is inherently good or bad and no *thing* is worthy of banning.
a rock on the ground
can be polished and made into jewelry
can be thrown as a weapon
marijuana
can be used to treat glaucoma in aids patients
can be used to intoxicate
alcohol
can be used to sterilize for life saving surgery
can be used to incapacitate a girlfriend for date=rape
any *thing* becomes bad only with one's unskillful thoughts, actions, words, intentions.
and even if it were illegal, do you think that would have stopped that particular person from getting one? no, it might have made it a little more difficult, but like the carter-era bumper stickers... "When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns."
Banning hots will only punish the keepers who follow the laws. The keepers willing to break the law will still have the snakes.
The kid who lied had the bad thoughts, bad intentions, bad actions, and bad words. The dealer did not, so why make him out to be the bad guy?
Chad
by the way, bobby, when the heck are you gonna get out this way and do some herpin with me? 