Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Southwestern Center for Herpetological Research

Lets hear what everyones opinion is!!

atroxhandler Nov 13, 2006 08:20 PM

I have been looking at alot of pictures lately and I think it seems like the tigers are in the lead for attaining the greats length and weight. Most pics I see of truely big snakes are tigers. Does anyone else think this is true? I also think that the supers do not get near as big as the normals and tigers. If you don't agree I would love to see the pictures to back it up.LOL

Thanks DREW

Replies (1)

Jim123 Nov 14, 2006 06:54 PM

The tiger gene has been around for some time now and has been crossed to everything. You have no idea how large they can become unless you know something about the adults that produced the particular ones in question. Also the same goes for super tigers. They can be all over the scale depending on their background. The Baldogos have some very large super tigers so that pretty much rules out your theory.

Jim

Site Tools