I have noticed that burmese and african rock pythons digest meals much more quickly than reticulated pythons and felt that it was post-worthy. Burmese seem to break down and digest even a large meal in roughly 2 to 3 days and defecate it in as few as 5 or 6. Rock pythons seem to have an even more rapid digestive process than this. I commonly observe the lump from a large meal in a retic up to a week later and defecation is often nearly two weeks after the fact. It seems apparent to me that they require less food to thrive and grow, and one may accurately say that they are more "efficient" and thus cheaper to own. All three species can show comparable growth extremes, though the burmese do seem to grow a bit faster than the other two on average.
Does anyone else have any data to offer on this subject? I would be very interested to read it if so.
Note: The above data was noted under steady temps ranging between 86 and 92 degrees, though usually around 90. The food items was predominately rabbits, but rats showed the same results in younger specimens.
-----
It isn't "Ideas" that fail or succeed,... it is the "Systems" which are instilled to launch and sustain the idea that either fail or succeed.>[Me.]

