New poster in this forum, although I'm not new to kingsnake.
I noticed a post earlier, and I wanted to post this question not so much to the individual, but to the group as a whole.
The poster had stated that he purchased an animal from a source that wanted this animal to be sold as a pet- not as a feeder.
I suppose my question is whether you think this is an ethical thing to do. To purchase an animal that was intended for use as a pet, for feeding to another animal.
I just don't think this is the best thing to do. With so many sources for feeder stock these days, why would you deceive someone like that. Further, why would you use an animal that was raised to be a pet as a feeder?
I undertand that feeder are what feeders are. No difference in cows, mice, roaches, etc. Yet, in some parts of the world, dogs and cats are eaten, yet most of us would be not like to think of Fido or fluffy as menu items. I guess it's just a matter or our own values that we place on these animals.
Please, I'm not picking on anyone. I just wanted to get a feel for opinions on ethics.
Regards;
-----
Victor Gomez
gomezvi@yahoo.com







i can trade it to the store i work at for crickets, so it works out great. but i have never seen any rodent average 21.