>>I guess what I'm saying is that given the potential for "phenotypic drift" in captive populations(I might have just made that up)and that in most cases locals yield significant outlayers from the dominant phenotype,
Tony,
The thing is that those animals in the photos "do not" represent "normal" phenotypical drift from Jeff Davis, period.
Guessing the local is futile, but it is a might bit easier to guess where they are NOT from! I was very careful to preface my comments with "In my opinion", which translates to no more than an educated guess (IMO an accurate guess).
SPECULATING on the local of a captive-bred animal seems a futile gesture. So my next question is why bother? Wouldn't it be more to the point to tell/remind us newbes what you old hats need to consider an animal locality stock. I mean to the point Joe if I got a locality pair from you but down the road I couldn't recall who I got them from they would become generic right? We could speculate all day and it wouldn't matter one bit.
Tony,
Precisely. If you don't know where it is from, don't guess when labeling them! There is no harm in guessing for fun, just like JJ's Guadalacazar mex mex. You might guess it's mex mex or thayeri, or that the thayeri it is most closely related to will soon be split from the "leonis" thayeri. In the end it doesn't really matter, right? It's still a cool snake no matter what it is!