Any consideration or deference given to hunting regs in other states like CA, AZ, NM, perhaps all other states except Texas, where reptiles and amphibians DO HAVE DIFFERENT REGULATIONS, where take of non-protected species is allowed from public roads and right of ways notwithstanding ample public land available for taking reptiles and amphibians? Just curious if Isett and Hildebran feel they are on an island? I'm referring to the statement made by the idiot Creel in the article, which I've reproduced below:
"Creel told LIVE! that H.B. 2414 was fostered, then spurred through committee, by Isett’s participation in a special interest thrust within the House. “He [Isett] is chairman of the Sportsmen’s Caucus in the legislature, so through discussions with folks there who work in the Capitol, who work on sportsmen’s related issues, we chose to address this situation,” said Creel. “This [bill] will mean that the same provisions that affect other hunters, will now apply to those that hunt reptiles. We are simply putting all of that hunting on the same regulatory level. We’re making hunting law consistent.”
Do you have access to Joe's "special" forum?
Robert