Aaaah! I see. Didn't think of the disease potential, and of course I would never release any of my captives without first checking the legalities of it. Think I may try to obtain a pair anyway just to have and appreciate
What did you have to do to obtain permits to keep them,
Well I didn't do anything special, well maybe a little:: I just purchased them and when I renewed my permit put them on there, the guy from the state did say they won't be available for long for permitting, best to permit soon. Also if you call F&G permit division, a girl named Monica will be happy to answer that question, I have not seen anything in writing stating that claim (unable to permit) but I am sure Monica could clear this up for you, rumor for years was you count not keep them, then I was thinking they are not endangered they are threatened, so I called and they said its ok as long as they are not wild collected , have a receipt to prove legal acquisition , they can only be purchased for possession in NJ from out of state sources and or a legally permitted individual in NJ (such as myself
)
do you know of anyone I could contact about reproducing these snakes for the purpose of release into the wild?
It is not allowed all together (unless the state is working a program that you could get in on = check their site) they heavily fine people for liberating snakes, even if they are indigenous to NJ. They have very good scientific reasoning behind this rule. Captive animals may have certain disease and or parasite issues and if released have the potential to spread a disease in the wild specie and possibly cause extirpation . I had similar interests, like you, and inquired about the possibility, All snakes (just about) derived from the Herpetoculture Circle are not considered genetically diverse enough to be used in the "Species Survival Plan", ( States and Science departments opinion, which I agree with) Imaging with each inbreeding the neonatal snakes loose 25 % of their genes and usually create lethal combinations and or anomalies that are not suitable for the "Wild Type" animals survival status. One would have to collect the animals from the pine barrens to start with good solid unrelated stock. Herpetoculture people tend to line breed most species and therefor make them genetically worthless for such a program that involves replenishing their wild counterparts. State would not allow one to collect them for this said purpose, plus in multiple animal collections, the pines may be inadvertently exposed to some type of bacterium, virus , and or micoplasms that could be lethal to Herps and animals in general, because they can not create Antibodies to fight the "alien infection", so any type of release/replenishing should involve a sterile environment and be conducted in the Lab to ensure the animals genetic integrity is not polluted and no diseases are introduced into the wild niche of all animals in that particular ecosystem.
I am babbling , you get the point.
Concise version.
Do not liberate any animals into the wild for any reason, even if indigenous to the area. Better safe than sorry, just look at all the frogs being wiped out from an introduced fungus that they can not fight off and subsequently they are perishing in large numbers. (that's a theory of the science community). I also liked the idea of " replenishing" , but didn't delve on the possible consequences of creating a condition that does more harm then good.
Although, I am 100 % certain my northern's are from 3 different bloodline, one being the so called ocean county one, my animals are not suitable either, due to all the different species I keep and the possibility of introducing a lethal combination of germs into the wild must not be over looked, while it may not cause the captive or wild northern's any harm, who knows what it could do other animals in the ecosystem. Ecological Homeostasis is not too hard to disrupt and negative consequences could easily be produced.
Did I mention this is not a good idea. =)
-----
Thanks,
Frank Roberts
Roberts' Realm Of Reptile Research
