Very interesting paper, however, I see one potential flaw in the study. All the snakes they used were from private collections. This presents two possible problems:
1. That the owners of the snakes were correct for the locality of each snake (knowingly or unknowingly), and that the snakes had been born from purebred snakes from the same locality and there had been no hybridization or mixing of localities somewhere in the bloodline of the animal.
2. That the snakes were within only a few generations of wild snakes (if the snakes were the offspring of snakes that had been in captivity many generations, you start to get a bottleneck effect and you lose the genetic variability within the species that you see in the wild).
I think the study could be considered more conclusive if the mDNA collected was from wild snakes. However, it is still a very important and interesting study and a great read. One of the important conclusions is that it is not always reliable to delineate species and relationships between species based on color patterns alone.
