Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You

New DNA study

HaroldD May 23, 2007 07:46 PM

here is a link to an important new mtDNA study of the mexicana complex.

It really raises more questions than it answers.
Based on the limited data, it would appear that the Davis Mts. king is quite distinct from other alterna.
And thayeri is not a mexicana at all.

Replies (8)

MichelleRogers May 23, 2007 08:56 PM

I don't see the link can you please send it to me.
thanks
-----
Michelle
All things bright and beautiful,
All creatures great and small,
All things wise and wonderful:
The Lord God made them all.

mfoux May 24, 2007 01:31 AM

I'm very interested in this, too.

bobhansen May 24, 2007 08:25 AM

Michelle:

I've had a link to the "in press" version on the website for some time. Just scroll down to Bryson et al. 2007, then click on the link to download the pdf file.

http://www.sierraherps.com/bibliography.htm

Cheers,

Bob

www.SierraHerps.com

MichelleRogers May 24, 2007 09:20 AM

np
-----
Michelle
All things bright and beautiful,
All creatures great and small,
All things wise and wonderful:
The Lord God made them all.

HaroldD May 24, 2007 12:02 PM

http://www.naherpetology.org/pdf_files/711.pdf

jr56 May 25, 2007 12:04 PM

You are right, very interesting article, thanks for sharing.

JL1981 May 27, 2007 04:26 PM

Very interesting paper, however, I see one potential flaw in the study. All the snakes they used were from private collections. This presents two possible problems:

1. That the owners of the snakes were correct for the locality of each snake (knowingly or unknowingly), and that the snakes had been born from purebred snakes from the same locality and there had been no hybridization or mixing of localities somewhere in the bloodline of the animal.

2. That the snakes were within only a few generations of wild snakes (if the snakes were the offspring of snakes that had been in captivity many generations, you start to get a bottleneck effect and you lose the genetic variability within the species that you see in the wild).

I think the study could be considered more conclusive if the mDNA collected was from wild snakes. However, it is still a very important and interesting study and a great read. One of the important conclusions is that it is not always reliable to delineate species and relationships between species based on color patterns alone.

bobhansen May 27, 2007 05:26 PM

Actually, all samples were taken from known-locality animals. While a few were obtained from private collections, these were wild-caught snakes. For example, Tim Gebhard is cited (see Table 1) as having provided one of the samples for a Nuevo Leon specimen. This was a wild-caught female collected illegally and confiscated by US authorities; its origin is well established. The same goes for the other samples. There might by problems with this study, but questionable source material is not one of them.

Cheers,

Bob

Site Tools