Let me ask you this when you read my post, did you go what was the point of that? Cause that was the intention, because when I read you post thats what I said.
My origional;
"Although the amperage drawn and the heat produced might be drastically differnt than we are used to"
Your post had nothing to do with that correct statement in fact you just agreed that it was infact a true statement. I just worded my response so that you would.
In Dave and my typical applications we run probably 10-12 amps through our tape to achieve our temps. His friend now running a smaller piece will draw less than one amp for the same temp. That was my point, a vast difference, we aren't used to.
>>Sorry Jeremy, but you just repeated what I said and tried to make it look like your idea.
Not my idea, you can talk to James Watt about that one.
>>If I say something wrong, correct me, please. Don't try to look like your correcting me when you are simply repeating me.
Wasn't trying to correct you or say you were wrong just tryed to make you see my point.
Perhaps I should have worded the phrase "Sorry Wade my point is..."
Best of Luck