Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here to visit Classifieds
Click for ZooMed
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You

Should leopards not be co-dominant?

arcanemind Jul 11, 2007 09:21 AM

Just my observation. Every het leopard i've seen has had a distinct look to it, much different than a normal. then the Leopard would be the super form.

Has anyone discussed this prior?

Replies (14)

Randall_Turner Jul 11, 2007 10:19 AM

Several people have discussed this. Many of those who work with them state that they can't be. But I feel they should be considered codominant, or if not the people who state otherwise should be able to explain why "het leopards" show to be distinct fairly regularly from normals. The hypo het leopard litters should be evidence of it.
-----
Randall L Turner Jr.
Boas make the world go round.

bthacker Jul 11, 2007 10:38 AM

Questions is...Do you get "het" Leopards from a "het" to normal breeding?

Randall_Turner Jul 11, 2007 12:03 PM

It appears you get a mix of oddities and normal appearing offspring from the few I've looked at. Which of course would be how a visual het morph would pass.

They to me are no different then jungles. Varying levels in the het form up to stand out hets.
-----
Randall L Turner Jr.
Boas make the world go round.

Craig K. Jul 11, 2007 11:12 AM

I agree 100%

EricNL Jul 11, 2007 12:20 PM

Not every het. leopard has a distinct look and what do you mean by "distinct" look. Like the hets from Winner ?

I have a litter from two hets. this year. So producing leopards and possible het. leopards. All possible hets. look alike. And all look (like the parents) completely different from what is considered the "het leopard" look (ao. bold dark markings).

Regards,
-----
Eric Tersteeg
http://www.boaconstrictor.nl

EricNL Jul 11, 2007 12:25 PM

All look similar to this one.

-----
Eric Tersteeg
http://www.boaconstrictor.nl

MiamiExotics Jul 11, 2007 07:49 PM

which of the three is a 100% het leopard?


vcaruso15 Jul 11, 2007 08:30 PM

n/p
-----
Thanks Vinnie Caruso
opinons are like a--holes... everybody has one and they all stink

kirby Jul 12, 2007 03:28 PM

It is hard to tell from a picture.

MiamiExotics Jul 13, 2007 02:40 PM

all three are 100% dbl het albino leopard females.....
the only one in the litter that looks like a true text book het leopard is the middle pic one.

bill why would you say that the first one is a het albino, the speckling or???

kirby Jul 13, 2007 03:19 PM

I wasn't sure I could see them in the others.
Bill

amiemac9 Jul 12, 2007 07:29 AM

I've been trying to figure this same thing out. I would say that #2 is the het, because it has "the look" of a het, as the whether this is a trick question and the others are too...I dunno. I just picked up a het leopard that looks a lot like #2. My plan is to breed my het to a normal looking Sonoran...see what pops out

Amie

MiamiExotics Jul 13, 2007 02:42 PM

If you do that, and half the babies have the look you may be on to something...personally I do not think they are "codom or supers)......I have quite a few that if dropped in with normals they will not be able to tell the difference

BoidaeAddiction Jul 12, 2007 05:29 PM

I'm not sure about the first one, but the bottom two appear to have that look that comes out of leopard X wildtype animals. If the top one is a 100% het leoparad then I'd throw away any theory of leopards being super. It simply doesn't have that look to me even though others believe it does. I personally hold to that theory that the leopard is the super, I guess only time will tell whats going on. It took pete a while to realize that jungles weren't recessive and that the super jungle was actually a super. Trey

Site Tools