All,
I wanted to post this email I just sent to Lance to answer some of the comments that have been posted on the forum since my last visit.
Lance,
Yes, I am still in the game and always will be. As you know we have a difference of opinion in regards to how the commercial issues are dealt with. I want a group that comes out and supports legitimate commercial pursuits with strong statements of support for the ability to sell founder animals, research animals and the like. You guys are not willing to do that. Why? I don't know because even if some of your members don't agree with this (denying reality) then they should at least realize that we ALL need to ban together to fight against all herp related laws and regs that are not reasonable. Having a bunch of splinter groups is a waste of time and resources. You can certainly see that? So to that end I will not support your position on Resolution 2. As for other issues I can support HCU's positions. But how much time and money should I or anyone put into a group that openly supports a position that is certainly not favorable to a large section of the stakeholder base? Further, since HCU openly states (numerous emails and posts from supporters) they will throw commercial people under the bus to get what they want would you work with such a group? You guys are in the infancy stage and I would strongly suggest a more moderate and inclusive approach while in the planning stages to build a better and larger organization. But you are fighting this at every turn.
Mike Welker
El Paso, TX



