Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here for Dragon Serpents
Click for ZooMed
Click here for Dragon Serpents

Dwarf monitors?

Stealth_Raptor Jul 23, 2007 07:05 PM

I have been told that any of the monitors under the subgenus Odatria can be considered as a Dwarf Monitor. Is this true?

If not, what are all the species out there that can be classified as one?

Replies (6)

wisconsin Jul 24, 2007 11:44 PM

timor monitor are dwarf monitors....i know there a few others---i think ackies are and black tree monitors---but i am not 100% sure

FR Jul 25, 2007 12:15 AM

First, the word dwarf is misused. Dwarf means, retart the development. Which means, smaller then normal. So a dwarf is a stunted individual of any species. An old two foot long water monitor is a dwarf.

Second, several members of the subgenus Odatria are midsized monitors. I would think any species that attains between 3 and 4 feet in lenght is mid sized. V.acanthurus, V.glebopalma, V.tristis, V.glaurti, all get over three feet.

Of course there are some truly small species that belong to odatria, like V.kingorum, V.caudolineatus, V.brevicauda, V.primordius, etc. Cheers

Stealth_Raptor Jul 25, 2007 05:10 PM

Thanks. It just seems odd to me that people are quick to classify Odatria as a designated subgenus for "Dwarf Monitors," which if I am not mistaken is any monitors that is smaller than 5'.

Stealth_Raptor Jul 25, 2007 05:15 PM

Sorry if the grammar made that sound odd. What I means is that it just seems odd that people would classify Odatria as the only subgenus for "Dwarf Monitors," when that term in definition is not a subgenus, but rather it is a pet trade label for any monitor under the adult length of 5'.

FR Jul 26, 2007 12:48 AM

To understand what is small, one must understand what is large. There are very few really large species. Say 3 of sixty some odd species. Then the very small is confined to a handfull of species, say five. The rest, the vast majority of species are from 3 to 6 feet.

Three feet cannot be consider small as its in the middle of what all varanid species obtain. The truely small monitors are under a foot in total lenght. If you have a species that can reproduce at 8 or 9 inches total lenght, you cannot confuse that to a monitor thats a yard.

It just happens those species belong to Odatria. Cheers

Stealth_Raptor Jul 26, 2007 02:39 PM

Thanks Frank. So I am guessing it is wrong for them to consider any monitor under the Odatria to be a small monitor, when it is only a couple of species that are.

It just seem like in the reptile community, if a monitor is smaller than a Savannah, it is classified as a Dwarf. Like you said, people misuse the label.

Thanks for the clarification.

Site Tools