Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here for Dragon Serpents
Click for ZooMed
Click here to visit Classifieds

Q&A about private exotic ownership

tigers9 Aug 02, 2007 07:58 PM

http://www.rexano.org//Wild_Exotic_Pet_Animal_Frame.htm

Questions and Answers about keeping Wild and Exotic Animals in captivity.

By Zuzana Kukol, August 2007

1. Should private individuals be allowed to Keep Wild and Exotic Animals as Pets ?

Yes, absolutely. Habitat of many wild and exotic animals is disappearing due to human encroachment, and the only way to save many species from extinction is thru captive breeding. Since it is us humans encroaching on their wild habitat, it is our responsibility to offer them an alternative captive habitat so they can survive into the next millennium.

Nobody is born an expert on captive animal husbandry, and the best way to become one is thru hands on experience and close personal contact.

Unlike domestic animals, most commonly kept exotics are small and relatively easy to take care of. Many books and care sheets are available in pet stores and on the Internet. Online Elists are also a great way to meet fellow pet owners and ask for more advice on how to become a better educated owner.

Majority of exotics sold in pet market are captive bred and don’t require as much space or attention as a dog would. Allergy is also less of a problem with pet reptiles for example than with a domestic cat.
This makes small exotic animals a perfect pet for apartment dwellers or a kid with allergies or asthma. Pet ownership also teaches kids about unconditional love and responsibility by caring for another creature.

Many veterinarians, zoologists, researchers and animal trainers wouldn’t be in the business now if they didn’t own wild animals as a child. We can never know which child or exotic pet owner will grow up to be our next conservationist, zoo director, biologist or wild animal trainer. Only thru close personal contact can we really understand and appreciate these wonderful creatures. Love and dedication for them cannot be taught through books.

2. Is a ban on exotic and wild animal ownership ever justified ?

No, never, especially not in America, where freedom to choose our animals is as important to us as freedom of speech or the air we breathe.

You often hear a phrase that “exotic animals are not for everybody”, and I couldn’t agree more. Most people who choose to share their life with wild and exotic animals do understand special care and considerations needed to keep them. They often live far away from amenities of a comfortable city life, give up extended (or any) vacations just to be able to share their lives with their exotic animals.

Just like we have few sensationalized cases of bad parenting or domestic animal ownership, we have few cases of bad exotic animal ownership. These extremely isolated incidents should never be used as a reason to punish the responsible majority of exotic owners, just like one case of child abuse shouldn’t be a reason to ban human reproduction and parenting.

3. Are there any serious public safety risks associated with exotic animals ?

Domestic animals cause many more injuries and fatalities than their exotic counterparts, so exotics are less of a public safety risk. But even with domestics, the risk of dying is extremely low compared to risks we encounter in everyday life from fellow humans, such as car accidents, murders or natural disasters.

Human to human disease transmission is responsible for more diseases than exotics to human transmission.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports, that food borne diseases cause approximately 76 million illnesses, 325,000 hospitalizations, and 5,000 deaths in the United States each year.
According to a CDC study 1.4 million human Salmonella infections and an estimated 600 associated deaths occur each year in the United States, but only 6% of them is associated with reptile or amphibian contact. However, less than 1% of human Salmonella infections are caused by the “reptile-associated” serotypes (reptile only specific salmonella strain).
This means is that many captive reptiles might not be the primary source of infection; they got infected by their food, raw chicken, eggs and vegetables, the same food their human owners ate.

CDC employee recently admitted that US privately kept non human primates never caused any disease in humans.

Many animal rights (AR) activists sensationalize exotic animal attacks and are presenting exotic animal ownership as a public safety issue to scare the public, but there are no facts to back it up. This fraud and fear mongering has to stop.

Exotic animal related fatalities are extremely rare and mostly affect owners and handlers, which is a hobby/occupational hazard associated with their profession, but not a public safety risk. This is not any different than sky diver dying in a jump or firefighter dying in a fire, yet, we don’t see calls to ban firefighters or sky diving.

4. Are Exotic and Wild Animals causing damage to our environment ?

Even if accidentally escaped or released, most exotics can not survive in the majority of our climate or harm native wildlife unlike feral cats, which are very adaptable and can survive anywhere and harm local wildlife and cause damage to the ecosystem. Most state wildlife agencies already have rules against possession of so called ‘detrimental” wildlife.

5. Is it true that most exotic animal owners abuse their animals ?

No, this is pure AR propaganda. Their real goal is abolishing all human/animal contact and to end all animal use; no animals in captivity, not even domestic pets, no farm animals and no leather goods…

Owning exotics, especially big predators, requires lots of financial investment and personal commitment on the part of the owner. Why would these owners invest so much time and money, give up so much of their personal freedoms and spent so much time fighting for their rights to keep their cherished pets if they didn’t love them? That makes no sense.
There is lots of personal sacrifice involved to own them, however, the exotic animal owners don’t see it as a sacrifice; they fight for their animals out of unconditional love for them.

Animals have to be in top physical and mental condition to perform in entertainment or to breed and raise young. Yet, tigers reproduce in captivity very easily, and there are more tigers in captivity then in the wild where their numbers are taking a steep downhill turn. This alone is the proof captive exotics are well taken care of, and if our government ceased to intervene with private ownership, the tiger and other exotics could be saved by the private sector with no cost to our government and taxpayers.

Many more veterinarians are also getting more knowledgeable about the subject of treating exotics.

If extreme AR activists claim there are so many abuse cases, how come we don’t have more court cases and convictions related to them? Where are the facts and proofs, instead of hearsay?

6. Are all the exotic and wild animal bans are a waste of our government resources and taxpayers money as well as attacks on our personal freedoms ?

Yes, bans on exotic and wild animals is a waste of our government resources, waste of tax payers money and a serious attack to our Constitutional freedoms and right to pursue liberty and happiness. Since there is no public safety issue, these bans solve nothing, cost too much and give people an artificial feeling of safety or accomplishment, since their real safety in real life didn’t improve with these bans.

7. Why are our legislators passing these bans ?

Many are truly just naïve and misinformed, some have been brainwashed by extreme animal right agendas and their well paid lobbyist. Remember, the extreme AR movement is composed of people making lots of money of purported animal suffering: the bigger the abuse story, the more donations for the group and higher salaries for their officers.

It is the extreme money hungry AR groups making money off the supposed animal suffering.
They have shown little or no concern over the displaced pets that might have to be placed in a crowded sanctuary or euthanized if new ban or extreme regulation (expensive liability insurance requirement) is passed. Exotic animals like big cats get very attached to their original owners, and unfair bans forcing them out of their loving homes is a form of abuse in itself.

It is the misinformed legislators, together with AR groups, who are the biggest threat to our animals. They are the ones sentencing endangered wildlife to a certain death by regulating them to extinction in captivity. If the wild habitat is disappearing and captive habitat is outlawed, where are the animals supposed to go?

8. What can we do?

Educate your legislators, friends and family about the threat these bans pose to the wildlife as well as to our freedoms. Contact your legislators and tell them to oppose all exotic and wild animal bans.

Photo Copyright © REXANO, All rights reserved

© REXANO 2007

www.REXANO.org
Link

Replies (7)

Juile Aug 02, 2007 08:59 PM

4. Are Exotic and Wild Animals causing damage to our environment ?

Even if accidentally escaped or released, most exotics can not survive in the majority of our climate or harm native wildlife unlike feral cats, which are very adaptable and can survive anywhere and harm local wildlife and cause damage to the ecosystem. Most state wildlife agencies already have rules against possession of so called ‘detrimental” wildlife

hmm they cant survive huh
Lol thats the most lame thing I ever read have you ever been to Miami ?

Not only are non natives surviving but they are reproducing and doing very well at the expense of the natives . Fish-Birds-Reptiles-Mammals-Inverts .

tigers9 Aug 02, 2007 09:06 PM

I didn't know Miami. FL constituted ALL of USA, please reread my sentence, I said MOST, not ALL. In majority of US states, escaped exotics can not make it thru cold winter.
Zuzana Kukol
www.rexano.org

Juile Aug 02, 2007 09:48 PM

Miami is 3/4th the United States lol kidding . I am not sure I agree with most as Ca -Tx-South as a whole many non natives can live.

I dont agree with keeping anything that if escapes or released could be dangerous to someone should be allowed.

Some states have become so out of hand the GVMT had to step in. I keep small snakes and I understand your concern but the problem is its cheap and easy to get many exotics ESP in Miami .

15 yrs ago my uncles neighbor had a cheetah (I kid not) in tiny enclosure . I dont know what became of it .

I dont want a ban ESP since I keep snakes but permits with gvmt inspections for many exotics I subscribe to and if the animal "dies" (released,escapes) and owner cant show proof they are fined .

Lots of good python owners in Florida are going to suffer due to the bad ones. In the long run allowing anyone to have anything backfires .

Eby Aug 02, 2007 11:53 PM

Juile wrote, "I dont agree with keeping anything that if escapes or released could be dangerous to someone should be allowed."

Feral cats and dogs cause FAR more harm than exotics. Should we ban ownership of cats and dogs?

Escaped or free-range livestock cause fatal accidents every year. Should we ban cows and horses?

Joe Forks Aug 02, 2007 11:56 PM

How about exotic wildlife (hoofstock) that is released on purpose, displacing native wildlife?

lbenton Aug 03, 2007 07:20 AM

>>How about exotic wildlife (hoofstock) that is released on purpose, displacing native wildlife?

He sells those kinds of things you know... People are not happy coming to TX to hunt for native wildlife, so this enterprising politician sells hunts for exotics to those people with enough money. BTW, he is also able to preserve this activity with his seat on the chair of the committee that regulates such activities. Is that a conflict of interest as a politician?

antelope Aug 03, 2007 08:44 AM

I would say that it definitely is, what says John Q. Public?
-----
Todd Hughes

Site Tools