Reptile & Amphibian Forums

SECTION 1. Chapter 43, Parks and Wildlife Code, is amended by adding Subchaper V, Non-indigenous Snake Permit. Section 43.851, Permit, reads (a) the commission by rule shall establish a permit that allows a permit holder to possess or transport in this state a live venomous snake or live constrictor (limited to five constrictors - that is not indigenous to this country. (b) The commission will establish separate permits for recreational and commercial possession. (c) A permit under this subchapter is not required for certain persons who possesses or transports a snake for scientific purposes. (d) Except as provided, a person may not possess or transport in this state a snake without a permit issued by Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD).

OK, it pertains to venomous not native to this country. However, why does it limit possession/transportation to five (5) constrictors? This will wipe out some good collections and make some expos very dull.

John,
I think that statement is misleading. What they mean is that that legislation only applies to 5 different species of constrictors.

I'm not positive, but I think a permit is required for each individual snake in your possession within those 5 species.

Yes, it is misleading, but is it legally enforceable? I know the law specifice the "big five" concstrictors but this particular statement doesn't say species, it just says "five constrictors"
I don't do well with ambiguity.
JH

the law is worded better than the final impact statement.