Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here for Dragon Serpents
Click for ZooMed
Click here to visit Classifieds

It's confirmed !

Kerby... Aug 08, 2007 12:06 AM

Well I have always thought that the same gene was responsible for the hypermelanistic Davis and Mendota california kingsnake...well I bred a male Davis male to a Mendota female and received 11 eggs....most are out with a couple still in the eggs.

Here they are....obviously pre-shed.

Kerby...
Image
-----
Lonesome Valley Reptiles
www.lonesomevalleyreptiles.com
Specializing In California Kingsnakes

Replies (17)

FunkyRes Aug 08, 2007 12:34 AM

n/p
-----
11.14 L. getula californiae (Cal. King)
2.3 L. getula nigrita (MBK)
1.0 L. getula floridana (Brooksi)
1.1 Pantherophis guttatus guttatus (Corn)
0.1 Pituophis catenifer catenifer (Pacific gopher)
0.1 Heterodon nasicus nasicus (W Hognose)
4.2.14 Elgaria multicarinata multicarinata - (Cal. Alligator Lizard)

antelope Aug 08, 2007 10:21 AM

Fat little sausages!
-----
Todd Hughes

Kerby... Aug 08, 2007 07:54 PM

Sometimes I think one ate another, they are so fat.

Kerby...
-----
Lonesome Valley Reptiles
www.lonesomevalleyreptiles.com
Specializing In California Kingsnakes

RossCA Aug 08, 2007 11:08 AM

Interesting. Thanks for sharing your findings.

Kerby... Aug 08, 2007 08:01 PM

Kerby...
-----
Lonesome Valley Reptiles
www.lonesomevalleyreptiles.com
Specializing In California Kingsnakes

Horridus Aug 08, 2007 11:32 AM

Congratulations! Nice to see some ANSWERS instead of more questions LOL

Kerby... Aug 08, 2007 07:55 PM

And lots more to come in the next few years.

Kerby...
-----
Lonesome Valley Reptiles
www.lonesomevalleyreptiles.com
Specializing In California Kingsnakes

reako45 Aug 08, 2007 06:02 PM

Whatever result you were hoping for that pairing produced a very nice clutch.

reako45

Kerby... Aug 08, 2007 07:56 PM

I thought it was the same gene....but if not then they should have been normal looking double hets.

Mystery solved.

Kerby...
-----
Lonesome Valley Reptiles
www.lonesomevalleyreptiles.com
Specializing In California Kingsnakes

Aaron Aug 08, 2007 10:41 PM

Nice job! They look great too.

Kerby... Aug 08, 2007 11:29 PM

Now is the Baja the same?

I already know that IT IS the gene that produces Blizzards along with albino.

Kerby...
-----
Lonesome Valley Reptiles
www.lonesomevalleyreptiles.com
Specializing In California Kingsnakes

Kerby... Aug 08, 2007 11:31 PM

**I already know that IT IS the gene that produces Blizzards along with albino.**

Mendota/Davis that is.

Kerby...
-----
Lonesome Valley Reptiles
www.lonesomevalleyreptiles.com
Specializing In California Kingsnakes

Aaron Aug 09, 2007 08:52 PM

I think the hypermelanistic Baja nitida/conjuncta will prove to be the same gene as the Davis/Mendota. the reason being that they all are naturally occuing and as far as I know all occur side by side with normal phase cal kings.
The real mystery to me is why does the hypermelanistic trait in Davis/Mendota appear to be linked to striped/abberrant patterns.

FunkyRes Aug 09, 2007 09:14 PM

It is possible that there is more than one hyper gene but that they are allelic - one affecting pattern, one not.

Or perhaps the complex soup of cal king pattern genetics - the pattern genes in davis area are affected by the hyper gene in a non simple mendel way. We already know pattern is not simple mendel, so that is (I think) a reasonable possibility.
-----
11.14 L. getula californiae (Cal. King)
2.3 L. getula nigrita (MBK)
1.0 L. getula floridana (Brooksi)
1.1 Pantherophis guttatus guttatus (Corn)
0.1 Pituophis catenifer catenifer (Pacific gopher)
0.1 Heterodon nasicus nasicus (W Hognose)
4.2.14 Elgaria multicarinata multicarinata - (Cal. Alligator Lizard)

Kerby... Aug 09, 2007 09:41 PM

The males are more striped and the females have more banding.

On the high whites the best ones I've seen have been males.

On some traits it seems that the males are more intense.

Kerby...
-----
Lonesome Valley Reptiles
www.lonesomevalleyreptiles.com
Specializing In California Kingsnakes

squidgyfish Aug 10, 2007 06:10 AM

"The males are more striped and the females have more banding."

So is this proven? I remember reading something about this a long time ago but it was disproved after they found btoh genders in both patterns. I didnt realise the ratios were favoured for one or the other though.

Just a thought - could it be related to incubation? I know leopard gecko colours can be affected by the temps theyre incubated at, and this affects their genders too so is it possible that something similar is happening to calis?

Aaron Aug 10, 2007 08:31 PM

I really don't know what it is. Anything beyond simple recessive is almost too complicated for me. I can tell you that in the wild very, very few female striped/abberrant hypermelanistics have been found and it took a long time before anybody found one. On top of that very few people were breeding them and it took a long time before any female with striped/abberrants were hatched. For many years all of the females were banded but they did usually have solid black bellies with faint striping just on the underside of the tail and dark stripes behind the eyes. As a result people belived for a long time that males were always striped/abberrant and females were always banded.
Recently through the work of Kerby and Rick Staub we have seen quite a few female striped/abberrant hypermelanistics. Also there have been a few seen in the wild recently but I think it is only like 1 out of 30 or 40 females has been striped abberrant. So we know it is possible but we still don't know why it's not seen as frequently.

Site Tools