ROFLMAO OK,OK I GET IT, let me try this again ive copied your post and will "try"(bear w/me
) to make my opinion more clear for ya.
Thomas as always with this you are talking about 2 different things at once. Or more than that really. You are on both sides of the fence and on top of it, and for that matter I think you would be standing at the intersection of four fence lines.
>>now thats funny
i dont care who you are
lmao!!!
For one you claim to not believe in subs and then name subs as influencing the look of the animal in question.
>> yes i am a lumper to an extent and believe in FORMS as opposed to subspecies, i believe goini IS lgg just like sticticeps is, i believe floridana is valid, i believe appalachicola are lgg and lgf nat.intergrades and dont deserve ssp. status. i named these other subs to TRY to get my point across as i know many feel goini and others are all valid ssp. sadly it seems it didnt work.
I know what you are trying to say, that the lineage is shared between all the subs you mentioned historically and these animals are showing the historical influence of them.
>>>yes,yes, and yes
But then you sorta say that it is maybe man made.
>>>i beleive many that are seen/represented today in the hobby today as pure Ga.locale lgg have been crossed maybe im wrong.
You never really say what you think and maybe that is the best stance to take since neither you nor I really know and neither does anyone other than Kevin. But for the sake of argument lets get your view out there in the open. Is this a man made animal or the result of historical traits being brought out through selective breeding??
>>>lmao now im lost
let me say it this way kevins animals IMHO ARE manmade(thats what selective breeding is be it locale or otherwise???) WITH historical traits of goini,appalach,floridana being brought out through selective breeding.the implication that these are PURE locale lgg is saying if you collect from that locale All animals in or from that locale will look like that even F1's which is simply NOT the case kevin and others have put years into refining the look of those animals.
If all you are ever saying is that these animals are exhibiting historic traits I am with you. But it always seems that you are not saying that, so put it out there nice and clear.
>>>im sorry hope this post makes it nice and clear for you.
LOL I have been answering to many people while I typed this and now I don't know or care what the rest of my point was so lets just start here.
Jason
>>>like i said before i love the wide abberant orange Ga. getula i just dont feel they represent all Ga.lgg or even TRUE lgg as described taxa wise for that matter. now PURE sure they are pure... pure getula as far as ive seen.
i see you posted that lgg again is that a Ga. locale lgg??,,,,,,,,,thomas davis
-----
Morphs... just like baseball cards BUT ALIVE, how cool is that???
my website www.barmollysplace.com