Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Southwestern Center for Herpetological Research
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You

New paper: Evolution of an arsenal

BGF Sep 21, 2007 03:27 PM

It covers the advanced snakes from tip to tip, dragging the non-front-fanged snakes out from the dark ages. This paper is the result of several years of work, this is reflected in the length

This is the unformatted version of the paper. The journal will have the formatted version up in about six weeks. I'll then update the link. The content will not change with the formatting though.

It can be downloaded from

http://www.mcponline.org/cgi/reprint/M700094-MCP200v3.pdf

Evolution of an arsenal: Structural and functional diversification of the venom system in the advanced snakes (Caenophidia)

Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/mcp.M700094-MCP200 on
September 12, 2007.

Bryan G. Fry, Holger Scheib, Louise van der Weerd, Bruce Young, Judith McNaughtan, S. F. Ryan Ramjan, Nicolas Vidal, Robert E. Poelmann, and Janette A. Norman

Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010 Australia

Corresponding Author: bgf@unimelb.edu.au

Venom is a key innovation underlying the evolution of advanced snakes (Caenophidia). Despite this, very little is known about venom system structural diversification, toxin recruitment event timings or toxin molecular evolution. A multidisciplinary approach was employed examine the diversification of the venom system and associated toxins across the full-range of the ~100 million year old advanced snake clade, with a particular emphasis upon families that have not secondarily evolved front-fanged venom system (~80% of the 2500 species). Analysis of cDNA libraries revealed complex venom transcriptomes containing multiple toxin types including three finger toxins, cobra venom factor, CRISP, hyaluronidase, kallikrein, kunitz, lectin, matrix metalloprotease, phospholipase A2, snake venom metalloprotease/ADAM and waprin. High levels of sequence diversity were observed, including mutations in structural and functional residues, changes in cysteine spacing, and major deletions/truncations. Morphological analysis comprising gross dissection, histology and magnetic resonance imaging also demonstrated extensive modification of the venom system architecture in non-front-fanged snakes, in contrast to the conserved structure of the venom system within the independently evolved front-fanged elapid or viperid snakes. Further, a reduction in the size and complexity of the venom system was observed in species in which constriction has been secondarily evolved as the preferred method of prey capture or dietary preference has switched from live-prey to eggs or to slugs/snails. Investigation of the timing of toxin recruitment events across the entire advanced snake radiation indicates that the evolution of advanced venom systems in three front-fanged lineages are associated with recruitment of new toxin types or explosive diversification of existing toxin types. These results support the role of venom as a key evolutionary innovation in the diversification of advanced snakes and identify a potential role for non-front-fanged venom toxins as a rich source for lead compounds for drug design and development.

-----
Dr. Bryan Grieg Fry
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Department of Biochemistry,
Bio21 Institute,
University of Melbourne
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.venomdoc.com

Replies (3)

yoyoing Sep 22, 2007 01:38 AM

That read like a piece of art. I am sure this work is very significant and seminal. The content was way out of my field, but I would like to humbly suggest a few grammatical changes.
The third sentence in the summary (abstract) left out the word "to" between "employed" and "examine".
I would strongly suggest replacing the first word in the manuscript with "What" instead of "It". This suggestion applies to a few other places.
Again, these are just thoughts garnered from my experience and in no way reflect upon the research.
Congratulations!!!

BGF Sep 22, 2007 08:53 AM

Cheers for that. I"ll be able to make grammatical changes on the page proofs (but not contextual changes).

BRhaco Sep 22, 2007 11:40 AM

no post
-----
Brad Chambers

The Avalanche has already started-it is too late for the pebbles to vote....

Site Tools