The thread below does pose some interesting questions. Let's say "Bill" purchases a 100% het albino from "Ball Python Morphs". Then "Bill" decides to sell the het BEFORE proving it. Who is responsible?
A) I normally do not sell an animal as 100% unless I HAVE PROVED IT as such. That includes picking up animals from large, trustworthy breeders. But if I purchased a 100% het from a big breeder and sold it without proving it, it should be up to me to make it right with my customer. Then I need to go back to who I purchased the snake from and have them make it right with me.
B) If the animal is truly legit, the original breeder (or last person to prove the animal) should not have any issues with trying to make things right. I sold a 100% het to a guy who then sold it to someone else. That person called me and I was able to verify that that was the animal and it was 100% het - he proved it out this past season. But just because it changed hands did not relieve me of my responsibility. Or does it? In my mind it does not.
C) We all feel more confident reselling a 100% het purchased from a big breeder than a smaller breeder. Should we? If you sell it as 100%, does that make you responsible?
D) If you question the genetics at all, is it ok to say you purchased this animal as 100%, but do not guarantee since you did not prove or produce it?
E) If you were the buyer, how would you want to be treated?
-----
Jay A. Martin
Jay Martin Reptiles



