>>>>Head to body proportion varies with individuals in my experience and has absolutely nothing to do with whether the animal is wild caught or captive bred.
>>
>>First, I think you are under-generalizing here. It is a WELL established fact that ratsnakes have pheontuypic plasticity inm the shapes of their heads, and adult ones IN THE WILD "almost always" have larger heads (comparatively speaking) than cpative ones of the same size.
KJ,
I do agree with you about phenotypic plasticity, there's no denying that fact in relation to the size/proportion of the animals' heads. However in my experience I have not seen a trend in wild or captive animals that would allow me to comfortably state whether an animal is captive or wild caught simply based on head and/or body shape. I've personally observed obsoleta type animals in the wild in 11 states and have seen/owned many wild and captive animals from different locales as well.
I have to admit as a neophyte keeper I actually thought I could sex obsoleta based on head shape... lol. At the time, all the adult males in my small collection had short stubby heads and the females had longer, more slender head structure. Of course after my collection started to expand and I realized this generalization was entirely inaccurate. 
>> Diet relate, and I am firmly convinced wild rats eat and digest things they can NOT do in captivity do to the way snakes are maintained in captivity. Sure, they COULD be "just like wild ones, but they'd need cages of a VERY large size that was not very homogeneous in temps, etc.
I definitely agree, wild snakes do tend to eat more opportunistically than captive animals and surely eat things that captive snakes would never be offered. However, even in captivity some snakes seem to prefer larger meals and others prefer smaller meals. I can't say that I've noticed any differences in head shape in my own captive raised animals based on diet but its kinda like apples and oranges in that regard, there is really no control for the data to be of use. The wild snakes are going to eat larger prey when necessary, no doubt, so I'm sure phenotypic plasiticity does play in their head/body proportions. I probably shouldn't have used the words "absolutely nothing to do with" in my previous post (statement above, top of this post), that was truly inaccurate. But my point was that generalizations about head shape between WC and CB snakes are not always accurate and don't follow any hard rules, in my experience. *shrug*
>>>>SSecond, if a white ratsnake is a white ratsnake, do you feel the same about a HET white ratsnake just being a het white ratsnake? What about a normal from two het parents? Is a ratsnake just a ratsnake? Obviously, I think it is pretty plain that I do not think THAT way........ Anyway, it doesn't matter that much because ialso do NOT believe the Leucistic black rat is pure black rat.
Of course I am with you again on that... lol. My point about the "white ratsnake is a white ratsnake" was to the people that actually pay more money for a leucistic "black" rat when they could get a leucistic Texas rat for less. A white rat snake is a white rat snake. Now a white milk snake or a white king snake might be a different story.
How do I feel about het white rat snakes? LOL, I think you have been around on this website long enough to remember all the "black x texas" animals that used to be advertised on the classifieds just after the alterna.com days. Where are those snakes now? Its certainly curious that you don't see ads for those type snakes anymore.
To be honest, with all the outcrossing to black rats over the years and the Loves' outcrossing leucistic Texans to their local yellow/glades rats, you never know what you are getting with a leucistic rat anymore. How messed up is that?
>>>>>....but, due to outcrossing if it is not actually pure, the leucitics SOLD as black rats do tend to behave better than the AVERAGE ones sold as Texas rats....and they do tensd to have slightly different builds that should be obvious to people that work with captive ratsnakes AND observe them in the wild.
I've never kept leucistic "black" rats and have only seen them at shows so I'll have to take your word on that. *evil grin* But I will say that all the leucistic texas rats I've owned and/or produced over the years had quite a bit of variation in their attitudes. Some were nippy, others were not. Personally I don't think it matters much what subspecies the animal is, its individual disposition will vary and so will the way it is raised in captivity. With handling even the most aggressive snakes I've ever owned settled down, some more than others. I personally disagree with the generalization that leucistic "blacks" are tamer than Texans and their head shape is different. Can you say "bull butter"? LOL, but that's just me.
>>>>>>I knew what Bill meant about the "difference," and I am firmly convinced that his references, as a GENWERAL rule, are accurate AND useful.
Absolutely no disrespect to Bill (or you) but I disagree based on my personal experience with keeping the species (almost exclusively) for the past 12 years and observing them in the wild in many different areas and habitats. I guess I just see things differently than you guys, which is OK.
Thanks for chiming in KJ, its good see someone from the old days posting. After the k.com ban of 2002, there aren't many of the "old farts" still posting.
Later,
dg