This type of concept and education is totally naive. Which means, your comments are based on ignorance, at best and stupidity at worse.
As a pioneer with Cal kings, I first bred them in 1966. And produced many of the morphs that exsist today. I always keep them in pairs and groups, and I found them in groups in nature. This is FACT.
To be cannibalistic, means, they consider eachother as prey. This they DO NOT DO. CONSIDER, if they were cannibalistic, there would be no Cal kings. They simply would eat themselves out of exsistance.
The truth is, they live and work in colonies, as such, they do not feed on their own members. But like anyother carnivore, if starved they indeed will turn on eachother TO EXSIST.
The problem is, non-thinking humans, do not have the brains to understand, when a snake is hungry, really hungry, or straving. Or straving to a point of cannibalism. So many keepers ARE SO BONE HEADED, they strave an animal to the point of cannibalism, then simply state, oh they are cannibals. HOW VERY SAD, Hey?
I fully understand I am being mean, but come on, how mean is it to strave animals until they turn to cannibals. Sir, that is really mean. DON"T STARVE THEM AND THEY WON"T EAT EACHOTHER.
Also, animals do not read books, or watch TV or go to school. So much like primitive humans, they do not consider other tribes or races or populations as their own type. Many primitive peoples call themselves, the people. Every thing else is, the others. The others are simply other animals. So cannibalistic humans ate other tribes, that were only considers, other types of animals. This is very true with snakes.
They do not eat their own tribe, they do eat others, after all, they are only other snakes.
This is easy to test with kings and I have tested it many many times. All you have to do is raise clutches together. If you DO NOT STARVE THEM, they will co-exsist without problem. If you raise two different clutches(at least two) this way, You can then test this. Its not theory, because I have tested it. Once theory is tested, the results render it no longer theory.
Place an individual from one group(clutch) in with the other clutch. In most cases, that individual will be consumed quickly. It does not belong in that group and is considered prey.
This test(if repeated many times) is a test to show relationships. It shows there are bonds created thru proxsimity. They are hatched together, they que in on scent to recognize others. These animals then consider these individuals safe. This occurs with humans by the way.
So, before you go on about Cal kings being cannibals, you may want to educate yourself. The absolute truth is, you can keep them together, with no problems, I have done that for decades upon decades with this type of reptile and many others. But I am aware of two things. One is bonding, and the other is hunger. Hunger will drive any animal to cannibalism.
So, STOP STARVING YOUR ANIMALS TO THE POINT OF CANNIBILISM. hahahahahahahahahahahahhaha its actually not funny.
I apologise for being mean to you, but you deserve to be mean to. Before we keep animals in boxes, we SHOULD KNOW WHEN THEY ARE STARVING. cheers
p.s. snakes do not feed once a month or once a week or every three days, That is stupid human understanding, they actually feed often, like daily, when conditions support that, and then fast for long periods, "WITH" conditions that support that. The problem with stupid humans is, they do not offer or support those conditions, then say, see, those snakes are cannibals or some other such non-sense.