Diana,
I probably should have posted a different breeding pic in retrospect. I just uploaded one quickly for kicks before I realized which one I sent. This, I'm sure, is WAY more info than you need but I would expect others will have questions/opinions(this is kingsnake afterall LOL) and will read this post which was supposed to be a short response-- but I often struggle with brevity. Maybe it will aide someone else who may struggle with similar pitfalls of working with unproven snakes, or foster a discussion/sharing of ideas about a subject that is certainly subjective at the least. It would be nice if there were a rule book or site that dealt with the many gray-areas of the hobby. I guess some things are by their very nature SUBJECTIVE. The thing I think important to remember is that all of these beautiful creatures that we enjoy were ALL unproven -- until someone did. Because I have a few snakes I'm trying to prove this year, and in future years, I no doubt, like some of you, will have to deal with some of the following issues in the future -- so here goes.
I proved my ???? dominate with one clutch in September. Bred to a normal, I hatched 10 eggs (4 normals and 3.3 of my guy). The prettiest male had some egg stress and didn't make it ultimately. It's always the pretty ones that don't make it -- so it seems. I would be SHOCKED if he were not codom, but will have to wait until next season to know about the super. Two of his three daughters are little piggies and are already approaching 600 grams. If I can get them to size by spring/summer 2009 I will breed them. They will either go -- or not. I have a name for them, but am keeping that under wraps until I make some combos this season. I want to see what he does with 2-3 morphs. I want to play it conservative until I see a little of what he will do. I feel like the project will be best served by me doing at least a little bit with it. I have talked with a few well-known professional breeders personally and got some opinions from others through a friend because I am an AMATEUR with LITTLE experience afterall -- that is certainly true. What also could be true is that I proved a snake in my very FIRST clutch that might be an exciting new moph that may bring something of virtue to the hobby -- or not -- only time will tell.
I do believe that ANY snake will ultimately stand/fall on its merit. It IS the base, homo, super, and combo-potential of any morph that dictates its success/appeal. What is in a name? A Killer Bee by any other would look as SWEET!! The Evil Morph God handled the spider with great restraint at its outset. I'm sure it was not easy -but if the info I have is true, it was the responsible route both from a hobby, and a business perspective. Have some on the shelf, have a combo or two to show what it does/doesn't do before you market it/go public.
Ralph Davis is also someone I appreciate in that he works his projects and does not "formally' name a snake before he knows that it is at least to some extent genetic --sometimes not even then. He needs to KNOW more. What I also admire is that Ralph, is that he not shy about putting a name on something he sees as different from established morphs. I don't want to speak for him, but I suspect he feels the snake/project will best dictate whether it will be accepted/rejected -- not humans bickering about this name or that. I know that he could have named the super phantom goblin the "pond scum" ball and I would still be drooling and covet them! Awesome snake!!! I know there are many other breeders of varying degrees that also treat projects with care. I just grabbed two from the many.
There are more than a few ball pythons that are VERY similar, and yet have different names. I am not yet totally sure WHAT "my guy" is in the grand scheme of things-yet. But I AM prepared to take a position on what he is NOT when the time is right. That time is not now. The struggle for me was whether to do the more common approach of rushing out and naming and trying to market him in fear that someone else will have the same snake and beat me to it, or what I believe to be the more responsible, mature, and measured approach of waiting and "patiently working" with my snake and his offspring. I easily chose the latter when I came to the conclusion that focusing on what I am doing rather than expend emotional energy worrying about others would be in the general best interest of all.
So far this season I have my boy with a BUNCH of normals (he is a real stud!), that pastel in the pic, a yellow belly, and a het albino. This is my first year breeding so my morph girl selection is somewhat limited based on what I'm doing with other animals. I'm trying to take a short cut to get his WICKED pattern in yellow and white with that albino het. I'll have some albino girls ready next year.
I do expect that their will be at some point some controversy over my snake. Not my hope. Just keeping it real. That controversy might likely be brought by someone more "recognizable" in the hobby -- that means EVERYBODY for the most part. The only thing I will have to support my point of view will be the snakes I produced. I feel I need more in number and variety than I have now in order that any position I take be seen as somewhat legit. My ego does not require the drama that often comes these days with a new morph. However, I am not open to the idea of letting someone put a name on a snake I produced/worked with just because they have a higher hobby "Q Rating" or have been doing it longer.
I DO wish those of you who roll the dice spending your time and money on something other than a mainsteam morph in hopes that you will make something NEW!!! I love all the combos new and old, but "the new" gets my blood pumping!!! It is the creative part of ball pythons that SHOULD be most important whether it be combos or new stuff -- shouldn't it?
-----
Bill Buchman