I posted this in the Law Forum, but here's a link to it:
http://forums.kingsnake.com/forum.php?catid=13#1490772
Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.
I posted this in the Law Forum, but here's a link to it:
http://forums.kingsnake.com/forum.php?catid=13#1490772
None of the animals listed are venomous and therefore not included in the statement. Another piece of well written legislation. Another of our freedoms down the tubes. Nothing new. Another day in the USSA.
Thanks for bringing this issue up. Good post...
"all reptiles that are venomous by nature as determined by
department rule, including but not limited to Burmese python, reticulated python, African rock python,
green anaconda, yellow anaconda, Indian python, Asiatic monitor, Nile monitor, white throat monitor,
black throat monitor, and crocodile monitor, and any hybrids thereof"
Danger Venomous pythons!!!
I guess anyone that knows anything about herps was not available to answer questions then they wrote their bill.. But, i would be willing to bet that eventually will catch thier mistake.. Here in NY they have already banned all of the animals on that list.. Which did not effect my interests directly, but it makes me wonder what animals they will target next?
~ Mike Russo
.

Help, tips & resources quick links
Manage your user and advertising accounts
Advertising and services purchase quick links