Tattoos are used in agriculture and wildlife research for identification purposes. Horses, cattle and other livestock are routinely tattooed for ID purposes, and to discourage rustling (yes it still happens). Many species of wild large and small mammels are tattooed for research purposes by wildlife biologists. Dogs and cats are tattooed by their owners for similar reasons.
Identification of individual snakes in the field has always been problematic for field researchers...besides the clipping of ventral scales, tattooing has been proposed for permanently marking wild snakes. There is some doubt that tattoos would be permanent on snakes, given their habit of repeatedly shedding! This also tends to repair any clipped scales. The most effective current technique is the implantation of radio tracking devices. What could be more invasive than that?
Identification of captive snakes is just as fraught with pitfalls...hence tha recent move towards "PIT Tagging". This is certainly as invasive as tattooing, but perhaps less painful. I can envision Big Brother requiring tattooing of captive animals, including snakes, as yet another attempt to protect us Sheeple from ourselves.
So, ID tatooing of animals is here to stay. Personaly, I can not envision vanity tattooing of any of my animals. As for my own epidermis, I faint at the sight of blood, so not for me, Thank You.
Regards,
John D
-----
I am so not lesdysxic!
0.1 Creamsicle Cornsake
1.0 Bairds Ratsnake
0.1 Desert Kingsnake
1.1 Eastern Kingsnakes