mpollard/viandy:
Thanks for your input. The history is an easy thing. The first ones was created, SUPPOSEDLY, bu breeding "an Arabesque to a descendant of the original Sunburst Colombian Boa." That's in the link in my original post. Obviously, not all of the offspring from that line are brightly colored enough to be a sunburst arabesque. More specifically, if you had a clutch from that line, WHAT CHARACTERISTICS would you use to put some of them one the "arabesque" side of the table and what characteristics would you use to put others on the "sunburst arabesque" side of the table. If there isn't something people can use to make the subdivision, then I can't see how this differs from just another old marketting ploy to try and make something seem "more different" than it really is. That's just my opinion.
I am NOT referring to any specific ad currently on of off kingsnake.com, so this post has no reason to get deleted. I am not even quoting any specific ad. I will say that I have seen some that don't seem very colorful or very lacking of speckleds being marketted as sunbursts. Let's say someone got those animals and openned the box. How would they know the difference between a bright arabesque or a sunburst arabesque? Is there a difference? Is there something to prevent people from calling ANY bright arabesque a sunburst? If so, what is that difference in black and white? That's all I'm trying to find out.
As far as the idea that sunburst arabesques HAVE to result from that specific line, I don't completely buy it because (1) not all from that line look any different at all from regular sunbursts and (2) that would mean that an identical looking arabesque of another lineage - or the same lineage but that is unknown to the owner - with the EXACT same look would have to be given a new name. I personally believe both of those conditions indicate that sunburst arabesques are named by looks and nothing else.....so what are those looks?
Even if they are from the same sunburst x arabesque breeding, no all are "sunburst arabesques." Is this more than a name to distinguish the best from the worst and everything else in-between is called a sunburst by the breeder if it makes them an extra dollar???? ....or is there that difference I'm looking for?
Sorry to repeat myself so many times, but I really want it clear what I'm asking. I don't care about the history or how hard these are to produce. I'm asking what makes sibling #1 a sunburst arabesque and what makes similarly looking sibling #2 a regular arabesque. To the best of my knowledge, "sunburst" is a selectively bred trait and NOT a Mendelian-style gene. In other words, it isn't simple recessive, dominant, codominant, incompletely dominant, etc. It is a non-Medelian selectivelt bred trait. If anyone else has more information that sunbrust is an on/off thing, please provide the data because that isn't what I've been reading elsewhere!
Thanks for everyone's time!
KJ
-----
KJUN Snakehaven
Pituophis.net
KJUN Firearms