This is in response to what I read in the earlier thread about dumerilii. It occurred to me that the huge success in captive breeding of monitors is almost exclusively confined to species from relatively dry and simple environments. For example there are thousands or tens of thousands of CB gouldii panoptes acanthurus pilbarensis storri abigularis etc and all of them could be at F25 generation by now. Is that a reasonable assumption? But I can't think of a wet forest dwelling species that has been bred in that way, or anything like it. In fact for most species it's still generally a rare event. It could be a lack of demand for those monitors, so there's less financial incentive, but for the prasinus group and (gulp) croc monitors, or any or the rarely seen Indonesian forms I can't imagine that it wouldn't be worthwhile and that lots of people haven't tried. It's of particular interest and importance because all the species with small threatened populations that would benefit from captive breeding are forest lizards and aren't being bred. The only non-forest species that is threatened is the Komodo dragon and that is being bred so much they make omelettes from them.
If it's really the case that forest monitors cannot be bred with the same high degree of success than other species then doesn't that suggest that they need something different. If so, what is it?
-----
Mampam Conservation










