Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for ZooMed

AZ Press: Rattler Bite more dangerous?

Apr 29, 2008 09:04 PM

KPHO (Phoenix, Arizona) 26 April 08 Rattlesnake Bites Becoming More Dangerous
Phoenix: More than a half-dozen people have been bitten by rattlesnakes in the last two weeks, and doctors are now warning that the venom is becoming more poisonous.
Russ Johnson nearly lost a finger after a severe rattlesnake bite eight years ago.
"It was just like wave after wave of pain as venom pulsed through the body," Johnson said.
Johnson still works with reptiles at the Phoenix Herpetological Society, but he said he's more careful now.
"I've broken eight bones and to be honest with you, after I got to the hospital, I'd rather have broken all eight bones again," Johnson said. "I did ask them to cut the finger off, but by then it was too late. It was already up to my elbow.
Valley doctors are starting to see more patients like Johnson, becoming critically ill after rattlesnake bites, compared to just a few years ago.
"These patients commonly have very low blood pressure. Many times they're lethargic or unconscious," said Dr. Steve Curry of Banner Poison Control.
Similar trends are appearing in southern Arizona, Colorado and southern California.
"The reason for this isn't clear to us," Curry said. "Snake venom can't just change across the country all at once."
Whatever the reason, Curry says rattlesnake bites are becoming more dangerous. That means it's even more important for someone who's bitten to get medical help right away.
Rattlesnake Bites Becoming More Dangerous

Replies (1)

Rio Apr 30, 2008 06:06 PM

Or...since the body responds to venom much the same way that it does infections, could this be a result of humans getting bitten less often by rattlers, and as a result, would less natural antibodies be passed to children while in the womb?

Or are such antibodies only temporary, and would be negligable in the child's adult life regardless of exposure to venom by parents and grandparents?

Site Tools