While visiting with Craig H earlier today, the topic of selective breeding came up. Speaking for myself, I have assembled a collection of very attractive locality bred alterna. The vast majority of my collection is now 2 or 3 generations removed from original wild caught animals. Each year, I tend to hold back a few of the babies that I feel are the most attractive. These animals are eventually integrated into my breeding colony and some of their most attractive babies are then held back. After 2 or 3 generations of this type of selective breeding, I am reliably producing very pretty babies. In most cases; however, the offspring no longer truly reflect what you would expect to encounter in the wild. They generally have better color and more interesting patterns than the majority of their wild (non-captive) relatives. My question is this. Does this type of selective breeding enhance or diminsh the integrity of these locality bred alterna? Craig and I batted this around alittle, but we never came up with a definitive position.
David Doherty



of that locality, I'd still value them as representing the locality. OTOH, line breeding a locality to select traits more representative of another locality or a strange morph might be very interesting, but NOT what I'd consider "locality".

), the female I caught on the last cut south of Alpine near Elephant in '06 (see pic below)is in my opinion one of the most attractive alterna I've ever seen anywhere. As long as you're selecting merely for appearance, I doubt it has much if any effect on the other traits that make up a locality snake....
