I do have dozens of examples of insect feeders and plant feeders, but that is not what I am asking or talking about.
I am afraid, most of you simply refuse to try and learn, all you want to do is jump the gun. You do not want to start at the begining and SLOWLY work from there. Learning starts at the bottom and works up.
This thread is more about starting at the begining and the begining of this subject, the how, where, and the most important part, then WHEN calicum is needed. The when is what I am looking at on this post.
This POST is ABOUT, those two species, not any other. Its showing how much they grew in a very short time. I picked those two because the little turtle just hatched and when I put it in with its brother, it was so tiny sitting next to it. I thought, what a nice picture of growth. I then add the albigs, because this is a monitor forum and I had the exact same type of pic.
With the albigs, it shows an extreme difference in size. And they are only a few months of age different. In this case, the larger albig may more then 500 times the mass of the recent hatchling sitting next to it. IF you would stop and use your brain, you SHOULD realize that the larger albig increased its entire skeleton somewhere in the area of that 500 times. THE ENTIRE SKELETON. As in, the jaw bone of the larger individual has more calicum then the entire hatchling. It got that calicum from somewhere.
As far as I know, there is no greater demand for the successful placement of calicum then when your doubling, tripling, up to 500 times or more, it may be way more, the mass of your skeleton. Is there any agruement here? does anyone have better examples of calicum placement? anyone? vets? keepers? phd's? anyone?? I am not telling, I am asking.
I did mention, that most think of calicum needs with gravid females, compared to this type of growth, the needs of a gravid female is very small compare to these examples, to shell the eggs is nothing compare to this type of skeleton growth. Yes, reproduction has an increased need for placed calicum over a static individual.
Sadly, 99% of cases of Calicum Deficency are with static non growing, non reproductive individuals. Which means, that the symtoms and remedies, are for individuals that have a very low calicum placement requirement. Why would individuals that have the lowest need for placed calicum, have the most problems?? This is the wonder of this disease.
This to me BRINGS UP A VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION, why are these non growing, non reproducing, animals getting rubber jawed, swollen limbs, and broken soft bones???? when they have very little need in the first place?????
Sorry for repeating the question, but I guess I was not very clear in the first place.
Again, I am asking this question. I am not giving an opinion or any manner of answer(yet, hahahaha). So please stick to the subject. What is the answer to this question?
While I do have ideas why those static individuals seem to express MBD more often then any other segment. I really do not know.
I do know, and have expressed that successful fast growing animals such as those pictured, do not seem to have those problems, in spite of "not" using the remedies that are RECOMENDED for the prevention of this desease. In fact, these animals were raised in conditions that are suppose to cause this disease.
So please address THIS subject and do not jump to whatever burr you have in your saddle. Once we understand this, maybe we can move on and eventually get to your burr.
So, do you have any ideas why these animals PICTURED, do not and did not suffer from calicum problems???????????
Again the prevailing conditions, no UV bulbs, no sunlite, no suppliments, and a very narrow diet. Are these not what causes MBD, so why do they not get this disease? Cheers