Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for ZooMed

Visual x 100% het = 66% het offspring?

RyanT Jun 11, 2008 03:57 PM

Or are they automatically 100% hets themselves? I know I should know this for sure already, and I DID. But math messes with my head. Just need verification. Thanks.

Replies (12)

SPJ01 Jun 11, 2008 04:07 PM

n/p

pitoon Jun 11, 2008 04:07 PM

it's quite simple............

visual (simple recessive) x normal = 100% hets

100% het x 100% het = 66% hets

100% het x normal = 50% het

66% het x normal = poss. het

50% het x normal = poss. het

Pitoon

Rob Lewis Jun 11, 2008 04:08 PM

>>Or are they automatically 100% hets themselves? I know I should know this for sure already, and I DID. But math messes with my head. Just need verification. Thanks.

You should produce some visuals out of that pairing. Any animal that is not a visual would be 100% het.

Assuming a simple recessive mutation, of course.

Rob

RyanT Jun 11, 2008 04:54 PM

Yeah. I was thinking if you breed a visual to a normal, you get all hets. So breeding to a het must make the non-visual offspring 100% hets. Just needed clarification. Thanks.

Anyway, now I have a line breeding inquiry. I bred my female to her son and I'm seeing that she appears to have proven out as recessive. Would it be smart to breed another of her offspring back to her again (her own grandson), or should I begin outcrossing now? What's the possibility that with that shallow of a gene pool, I'd just be wasting my time cause the babies will turn out buck toothed, slack jawed, and jammin the latest Toby Keith album?

Paul Hollander Jun 12, 2008 01:07 PM

:

XnatX Jun 11, 2008 05:48 PM

So you would not produce any visuals out of 100% het X 100% het?

Nat

XnatX Jun 11, 2008 05:58 PM

What I should have asked is......what would be a good book to read to understand ball python genetics?
Any recommendations?

Paul Hollander Jun 12, 2008 01:25 PM

If you want to learn genetics, Genetics for Herpers, by Pritzel, is good for the basics. Schaum's Outline of Genetics, by Elrod, is a good, inexpensive, all-purpose genetics text. These cover the principles of genetics which can then be applied to the genetics of ball pythons. Then get the Barkers' ball python book or McCurley's ball python book for the mutants and combinations.

Paul Hollander
Genetics for Herpers

VictorOToole Jun 11, 2008 05:59 PM

You might or you might not.

Breeding 100% het simple recessive to 100% het simple recessive will give you a 1 in 4 chance of producing a visual homozygous morph PER EGG. You get the same odds with each egg in the clutch, the more eggs you have the higher your chances of hatching at least one visual, but there's never a guarantee.

Vic

amador7872 Jun 11, 2008 06:55 PM

25% visual
50% het
25% normal
since only 2 out of the 3 will be het that is why the 3 will be call 66%het.

PHLdyPayne Jun 12, 2008 03:50 PM

In a visual x 100% het you won't get any 66% het offspring at all.

Each egg in the clutch will have a 50% chance to be the visual morph (if a recessive morph and the 100% het is for the same recessive morph). If it isn't the visual morph, then it will be a 100% het for that morph.

Some good online sources for basics of reptile genetics, check the following sites:

www.newenglandreptile.com/genetics_intro.html

www.vmsherp.com/LCGenetics101.htm (a more detailed genetic site)
-----
PHLdyPayne

Paul Hollander Jun 13, 2008 09:36 AM

I've looked at both of those web sites. On a scale of one to ten, with one the highest rating, these are around eight, which makes them average to above average herper genetics sites.

Paul Hollander

Site Tools