Well, if it was kept communally, and you aren't absolutely CERTAIN of it's exact genetic lineage, then all you can go by is what it looks like visually(phenotype), which is definitely amelanistic(albino). But it's virtually impossible to say anything beyond that. It basically looks like a nice "normal" amel to me,....and as "FunkyRes" has also mentioned, an amelanistic animal with no, or very little white being displayed is known these days as a "sunglow". However, in my opinion, it really doesn't meet the criteria to be called a sunglow either. It could easily have some other genetics floating around in it's lineage though, but by going on strictly "looks", which is all you really CAN do in this case, I would simply call it what it definitely is,.....an amel(albino) cornsnake.
Below is a photo of a snake that fits the coined name "sunglow". However, this animal was produced long before the sunglow name ever existed. I hand-picked this male from a clutch of normal looking albino corns, and this one stood out from the rest. It displays ZERO white on it's body, which was quite unusual 18 or so years ago.
best regards, ~Doug

-----
"Better to be silent and thought a fool, than to open mouth and remove any doubt!"