I didn't want to include my response in the main topic so here's what I think.
I like both pure locality morphs, as well as morphs for the sake of morphs. I like both because it's fascinating to me that nature can create something within a relatively small geographic range that's so far out of the norm (locality morphs). It's also fun to see what selective breeding can produce (morphs in general).
I think it's interesting and funny that people are averse to crossing BCC into Colombian morph projects that already have BCI hypo blood in them. The reason I think that is most people don't do scale counts and there are both BCC and BCI in Colombia. So, many people have Colombian BCC, and many have Colombian BCI, and many people have Colombian BCCxBCI. And many people have all variations! And practically everyone can't tell the difference (especially after generations of captive breeding). The irony is that salmons and orange tails are most commonly thought to be from Panama, home of BCI and they've been bred extensively into "Colombians", both BCC and BCI. And just because your "normal Colombian" boa doesn't have the hypo trait, doesn't mean it doesn't have the lineage!!!
I bring all of this up because I purchased a hypo jungle that has Peruvian blood in it and I plan to breed him to a Sharp albino. I'm worried that the marketability of the offspring would be greatly diminished due to the fact that the offspring would be 1/8 Peruvian BCC. I worry that buyers would shy away from them because they'll say they're BCI x BCC. Again, I point out that probably EVERY salmon descendant out there is a BCI x BCC offspring (Panamanian x Colombian). So what's wrong with throwing more BCC (Peruvian) blood into the line?
Well, I think I expressed my thoughts rather incohesively! What do you think?.. about the general idea, not my incoherent rambling!! 
jb
-----
Jonathan Brady
*You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.*