Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for ZooMed
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You

history of the ultra gene

wisema2297 Aug 13, 2008 04:42 AM

Is there in more info out there on the history of the ultra gene? I always was under the impression that it came from the grey rat. I said as such on another forum and was told that there is evidence to show that this is not the case. Supposedly there were breeding trials done by breeding an ultra with grey rats and the results proved that the ultra gene did not come from the grey rat.

I actually hope that I am wrong.

Walter Smith if you read this can you remind me again of what you told me on the king snake forum since I may have put my foot in my mouth?

Replies (29)

tspuckler Aug 13, 2008 07:04 AM

I'd sure like to know about these "breeding trails" as it takes snakes about two years to reach breeding size and if someone started from ground zero to prove or disprove that ultras are hybrids, it would take a few years. Since suspicions haven't arisen until relatively recently, I doubt that there's been enough time to prove anything.

You'd also have to consider who did the "breeding trials." Was it an objective party? Most people are in the hobby to make a little money and ultras had a high starting price. Since hybrids are generally frowned upon it would make sense that ultras be promoted as "pure" because there is more to gain from it financially.

There was an in depth discussion of this topic in this forum a couple of years ago and all the evidence seemed to be pointing to hybridization. One of the main promoters for ultra was curiously absent from the discussion.

I know the search engine in this forum leaves a lot to be desired, but it might be worth "going back in time" and reading.

Tim

wisema2297 Aug 13, 2008 08:19 AM

almost every morph out there has a known history behind it as far as where it first popped up, who found it etc. One good example of this is on serpenco's site Rich Z gives a pretty good account of where the different morphs that he has came from or how they were created...........all except the ultra.

pinky Aug 13, 2008 09:47 AM

There is a good discussion there. One of the member'f forum ther did the gray rat test. I think it was Carol of Low Belly Reptiles.

FunkyRes Aug 13, 2008 06:40 PM

If I recall - the breeding test only demonstrated that ultra was not the WT gene of that particular rat snake, as some had thought.

It does not mean the gene didn't come from a rat line.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

draybar Aug 13, 2008 06:46 PM

>>There is a good discussion there. One of the member'f forum ther did the gray rat test. I think it was Carol of Low Belly Reptiles.

Let's try this again
first time deleted.
Carol did test them out using grey rat.
I have one of those ultramels....and it is an ultramel
bred to an amle produced amels and ultramels.

-----
Corn snakes and rat snakes..No one can have just one.
"Resistance is futile"
Jimmy Johnson
(Draybar)
Draybars Snakes

_____

jyohe Aug 13, 2008 07:53 PM

got ultras like? 1991?......more or less.......

10 minutes after I got them I was told a story on how they were made.......and their relation to frosted corns too....

....I know how they look , I know how they act and I know how they are and smell........

I also know all my friends who won't infest their corns with any hybrids won't buy any of them.......no matter what color I make......

...........my opinion......there's something in them.........they are psycho......LOL

..

o b s o l e t a
-----
......

jyohe Aug 13, 2008 07:54 PM

more like 2001........LOL

.......I'll check the card.......(one is dead and) one is still here.........
-----
......

TandJ Aug 13, 2008 08:29 PM

Well, there is someone who posts here, that I have been lead to believe was one of the folks responsible for the Ultramel discoveries.. Might just be you need to ask the right people.. Some people are totally convinced it is a evul hybrid, and some think its a bunch of bunk..

Regards.. Tim of T and J

draybar Aug 13, 2008 08:58 PM

>>The following information is a copy of a post made by Joe Pierce about ultra

Begin Quote
"The difference of opinions about whether or not Gray Rat blood is in the Ultra line, is due to how much credibility some people put on the evidence that has been discovered over the years and/or how willing they are to put their heads under the sand and ignore what is right in front of their face. Some people would like to discard all evidence, that does not have DNA backing. This is the complete opposite position, they would take to prove a Creamcicle is a hybrid. Are Creamcicles considered a pure Corn Snake, until somebody does a DNA test on them to prove they in fact have emoryi blood in them? NO! The level of proof should be the same shouldn’t it?
When I began looking into the history of the Ultra gene, it was simply to find out as much about them as possible, for the Hypo Test Breeding Project. You would be surprised at how much investigating you can do, if you just take the initiative to send somebody an email and do a few searches on the internet. Mike Falcon is considered to be the originator of the Ultra gene. I was able to find his email address and Mike Shivers (Mike’s Motley) email address as well. Shivers is credited with creating the “Goldust” genotype, even though he thought they were a bright Amber Motley.
At first Falcon and Shivers acted as if they were pure Corn, but when questions were raised, Falcon changed his position from Pure Corn to “The original Ultra was bred to “Pure” Corns and to Gray Rats. His opinion about the original carrier of the Ultra gene is that it was a Hybrid of some kind. I can tell you that an Ultra Corn does not look like a hybrid, so why did Falcon come to this opinion? It is my believe that it looked like one. Falcon doesn’t even know if the original was homo for Ultra or het, and I am not even sure if it was a carrier or not if this years Gray Rat X Amel crosses produce Ultramels.
Falcon believes that he bred the Hybrid Ultra carrier to Corns and Gray Rats. Falcon’s pardoner in crime at the time, was Andy Barr. Barr is well know for producing Hybrids, and most if not all “Frosteds”, from Gray Rat X Corn Crosses can be traced back to him. Very few have known lines that can be traced at all. That is the thing with Hybrids, the information gets lost as people come and go in this hobby, and they all get mixed into the pot. According to Falcon, Barr bred a “Graysnow” (Snow Gray Rat X Corn) X Original Ultra. For all we know, Barr may have created the Ultra line and not Falcon. Falcon did tell me that White Oak Gray Rats were used, and some people believe that the White Oak Phase of Gray Rats may be caused by a hypo gene, which is the only reason at all that we suspect that Gray Rats may in fact be the Ultra carrier. We may find out that this is not the case at all.
Shivers had gotten completely out of snakes and was very willing to tell me his stories about the “Ultra Amber Motleys” that everybody was all excited about. After numerous emails that established trust with Shivers, in came the big email. Shivers said, I wonder if everybody would be so excited about the “Ultra Amber Motleys” if they knew they had Gray Rat in them. In addition to Shivers and Falcon both stating that the Ultra line has had Gray Rat bred into it, I found several old threads on other sites that talked about the Ultra line having Gray Rat in them. This is not a new story, but one that has held on. If Falcon and Shivers had gotten out of snakes, and I did not look into the history of the Ultra gene, everybody would consider Ultras as pure as all other mutant Corn Snake genes. At one time, I took all of Shivers emails to me about how he developed the “Ultra Amber Motleys” and based upon the generations he had bred them back to Corns, we were sitting at about 97% Corn Snake two years ago.
I am absolutely astonished at most peoples position, that if they don’t have knowledge about hybrid blood being in their Corns, then they consider them to be pure or at least purer than Ultras. The fact is that hybrids have always gotten a bad rap, and their identity is either purposely kept secrete, or is lost when people get out of snakes altogether. We can talk about how credible some evidence is, but there is a ton of evidence that most Corn Snake Mutants have hybrid blood in them. Any show that you go to, has a ton of evidence that this must be happening year after year. I have seen wholesalers put a shipment of Creamcicles in a bin with Amels, because they didn’t look Cream enough. I saw this with my owe eyes. Is that not one drop of paint? There has been gallons of paint poured into all Snakes gene pools since the beginning of time. Kings and Gophers have all been crossed to get the Amel gene into different subspecies for over 20 years, and Corn Snake hybrids have existed just as long. You have to look at the entire hobby as a whole, and as a whole, hybrid blood has been getting mixed into our Corns for over 20 years, but where is it? The Ultras have been getting mixed into Corns for 15 years, and Creams as well. These two sources alone, after 15 years of mixing is enough for me know, that the likely hood of a single Amel out their that is not of mixed blood, is extremely unlikely, and of course Amels has been bred into everything.
The only difference between the purity of Ultras and Amel today, is that I happen to catch Falcon and Shivers, and everybody’s Amels are “pure as far as they know“, but they are not really telling you what they really know, but what the breeder of their Amels told them. Pure Corn Snakes MUST have lineage records, or they are just as un-pure as the rest of our Mutants, Ultras, Amels and the entire lot."
End Quote
-----
Corn snakes and rat snakes..No one can have just one.
"Resistance is futile"
Jimmy Johnson
(Draybar)
Draybars Snakes

_____

tspuckler Aug 13, 2008 09:34 PM

Interesting post Jimmy, and interesting lesson in at least one bit O' breeding history. I've got one question and one comment.

Question: You mention "snow grey rat snake" in your post, but there's no such thing. There's amel greys, but I never heard of an anery, which would be needed to make a snow. Did you mean something else?

Comment: Yeah, corns and other snakes have been hybridized. Many "suspicious" individuals have been relegated to "junk snakes" as most hobbyists want "pure" stuff. The problem I have with ultramels is that if they are indeed hybrids, than at least some people paid a lot of money for what, if they knew better, they'd consider a "junk snake" and not wasted their money on. I can't remember if I first saw ultramels listed at $1k or $2k each, but that's a lot of dough for a misrepresented animal.

On the other hand, if ultramels are "pure" they sure lost their value fast, simply based on the rumor that they're hybrids.

It's an interesting story either way.

Tim

sean1976 Aug 14, 2008 12:59 AM

Heya Tim,

The quote is "According to Falcon, Barr bred a “Graysnow” (Snow Gray Rat X Corn) X Original Ultra".

What it means is that Barr bred a hybrid snake called a GraySnow which was a GrayRatxCorn which was homozygous for amel and anery. That animal he bred to the original Ultra. The GraySnow was most likely the second generation result of crossing a GrayRat with a SnowCorn.

Hope that clarifies.

Sean.
-----
1.1 BRB
1.1 Triple Het TPRS's
0.1 Silver TPRS
1.1 Amel Bloodred Corns
0.1 Abbott Okeetee Corn
0.1 Blizzard Bloodred Corn
1.1 Thayeri Kingsnakes
0.1 Reeve's Turtle
0.2 Amstaff's
1.0 Pudytat

draybar Aug 14, 2008 05:39 AM

>>Interesting post Jimmy, and interesting lesson in at least one bit O' breeding history. I've got one question and one comment.
>>
>>Question: You mention "snow grey rat snake" in your post, but there's no such thing. There's amel greys, but I never heard of an anery, which would be needed to make a snow. Did you mean something else?
>>
>>Comment: Yeah, corns and other snakes have been hybridized. Many "suspicious" individuals have been relegated to "junk snakes" as most hobbyists want "pure" stuff. The problem I have with ultramels is that if they are indeed hybrids, than at least some people paid a lot of money for what, if they knew better, they'd consider a "junk snake" and not wasted their money on. I can't remember if I first saw ultramels listed at $1k or $2k each, but that's a lot of dough for a misrepresented animal.
>>
>>On the other hand, if ultramels are "pure" they sure lost their value fast, simply based on the rumor that they're hybrids.
>>
>>It's an interesting story either way.
>>
>>Tim

Tim,
If you look back at my post you will see that I quoted Joe Pierce.
I am not 100% sure what he ment but I would assume that just like an amel corn/grey mix it was an anery/amel corn/grey cross.
we have them in emoryis and they have been breeding corns to emoryis and grey rats for over 20 years it isn't too hard to conceive a snow corn/grey cross
-----
Corn snakes and rat snakes..No one can have just one.
"Resistance is futile"
Jimmy Johnson
(Draybar)
Draybars Snakes

_____

tspuckler Aug 14, 2008 06:29 AM

Jimmy,

I either misinterpreted what was written and/or am not familiar with hybrid terminology. I know that are't any "pure" snow Grey Rats, but surely it would be easy enough to make a Grey Rat x Corn that is het for amel and anery (though I don't know why someone would do that). So it's a misunderstanding on my part.

Thanks for clarifying!

Tim

jyohe Aug 14, 2008 10:12 AM

making mutants is not that easy......snakes know that they should breed with the same sub-species.....you put them together and they won't breed......yes at times they do and yes they can be tricked by alot of people......but 98% of the time they just won't cross.......I tried crossing alot of milk ssp years ago and only one took.....(hondox stuarti).......pueblan wouldn't breed sinaloan and anulata would not breed sinaloae.....they know......

example of an oddity in captivity..........I have ball pythons.....throw like 2 albino and 4 hets into a tub...the hets all ball up and the 2 albinos were outside the hide together......same thing with spiders and normals....same bin....2 spiders were together and the 5 normals were all together......maybe they all just stuck with the same color/pattern......odd...but it happened yesterday with 3 clutches here.........usually they mix around ,,,but it makes me wonder when I see three boxes of snakes segregated like that in one day......

......almost all our snakes are mixed......sucks......balls aren't ,but they are working on it......burmese were ruined years ago when they banned importing Indians......alot of morphs are suspicious.......I love looking at brooksi posts that compare ultra corns with the new peanut butter and jelly morphs in brooksi......similar yet not hybrid they say......yet an ultra brooks is the same color as an ultra corns......and the genes are dominant or co-dom......and they just popped up now after 30 years of keeping Fl kings and brooksi......

........mixed
-----
......

tspuckler Aug 14, 2008 11:25 AM

Indeed. And you also have the issue of intergrades and unnatural intergrades, which is probably what's going on with that peanut butter & jelly nonsense. Though I think the point is that ultramels are widely regarded as hybrids and therefore shunned, in addition to having a giant price drop in a short amount of time. This drop being much more severe than "pure" morph price drops.

Although many morphs are hybrids/intergrades/crosses maybe by only a few percentage points, it definately seems that buyers, for the most part, want "pure" or pure looking animals, irregardless of how easy or difficult it is to create mutts.

Heck, for all I know there could be a return to locality, line bred non-morph snakes in the near future, since so many captive bred stuff is all beginning to look the same (colorless, white-sided, corn-king-rat-gopher crosses) and lack the uniqueness that wild snakes have.

I suspect a lot of people no longer go into the field and therefore no longer appreciate the adaptations different snakes have to live in their environment. It's a shame that "newbies" think the natural habitat for snakes are 8 ounce deli cups.

Tim

jyohe Aug 14, 2008 02:38 PM

all snakes have dramatic price drops.....all prices suck,,,period......the gold dust held enough,,and I have actually never seen one in person , so they aren't overly produced......ultramels were just soooo overproduced, all you need is an ultra and 3 amels and you can make close to 100 ultramels real fast......and noone even knows what ultramels are, even bigger dealers still ask what???.....a who?......
I tried to make as few ultramels as possible this year, I succeeded pretty well.......maybe a dozen ? or so......people still ask for bloodreds, and maybe lavs ,,,last show 3 to 5 people asked for cremes...that's what they all wanted...?? probably wouldn't actually buy one if I had them , but you know......(I have 0 cremes anymore)......nothing really sells anymore with the numbers we want / have....

......people look for CHEAP......put something on the table for 5 ,10 $ and they look at it......put an ultramel lav and they don't even read it...(they can't read more than 2 numbers at a time).......HA...

....my theory....cut down as many as possible and balls urinate once a week and defecate once a month..........hmmmm.....one good ball = same $$ as 50 to 100 corns........

......(yes it's all about the money)

YES we NEED mor and more locality corns...and yes it will be hard to get them and even harder to believe people when they sell them......I laugh at people buying locality black rats for $75......they look so much different than the ones in our yard ???....

corns are a little different......

miami, sand hills, haphazard road, hunt club,georgias,alabamas,jersey,maryland,north carolina and south carolinas... etc etc etc....CAN all look different......

have fun

...
-----
......

FunkyRes Aug 14, 2008 08:23 PM

snakes know that they should breed with the same sub-species

False. Subspecies is a man made construct (and so is species) - and there are numerous upon numerous examples where putting different subspecies, or even different subspecies, together results in copulation.

What keeps them relatively pure in the wild where two forms exist (and I say relatively) that don't often intergrate is very often habitat preference and behavior.

I love looking at brooksi posts that compare ultra corns with the new peanut butter and jelly morphs in brooksi......similar yet not hybrid they say......yet an ultra brooks is the same color as an ultra corns......and the genes are dominant or co-dom......and they just popped up now after 30 years of keeping Fl kings and brooksi......

PB is not new, PB is now getting a lot more attention because of the relationship with amel.

However - we don't know it is allelic with amel in corns. It could be a different locus all together.

I know cal king amel is allelic with corn snake amel, but I don't think amel floridana has ever been crosses with amel cal king or amel corn to prove them allelic.

My suspicion is that PB is allelic with Cal King/Corn Snake amel - and I will be testing that myself next year - but I don't think anyone has demonstrated that.

From what I understand - the original PB popped out of Bill and Kathy Love's brooksi, they didn't recognize it as a new type of hypo, and rainer (correct me if I'm wrong) bought up all of them that he could. Back then, yellow brooksi was the craze - hypos weren't a big deal.

Also from what I understand - Bill and Kathy Love did not hybridize their brooksi stock, and acquired most of their stock from a field collector.

It is however very possible than many of our mutant genes in NA colubrids are leftover from a common ancestor in their evolutionary history, which is why the same mutation at same locus may pop up in many different "pure" species.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

byron.d Aug 13, 2008 11:59 PM

that is a fine post.

Thanks very much for that info.

byron.d

byron.d Aug 13, 2008 11:52 PM

Considering the eye color, T Positive look, and overall appearance - to me at least, I would have to guess the gene came from the hypo Glades rat.

Just a thought.

byron.d

tspuckler Aug 14, 2008 06:31 AM

That's a fine looking snake, Byron!

Tim

draybar Aug 14, 2008 02:39 PM

>I pasted what I read now I will say what I feel.

I feel it is almost impossible to say, with certainty, that ultras do not have grey rat in their genetics. There is just too much evidence pointing in that direction.
But I also see all the corns being produced using ultra and some are simply beautiful.
I think it may be prudent to acknowledge the possibility of grey rat in their ancestry but at the same time if they eat like a corn, grow like a corn, breed like a corn, crap like a corn and look like a corn...who cares.
The only thing that bothers me is when people get all up in arms about how bad hybrids are and how they wouldn't have anything to do with any "corn" that MIGHT even have emoryi blood, no matter what percentage, but at the same time will ignore all of the evidence pointing towards grey rat in ultras and declare them 100% pure corn, without question, no doubt, guarantee blah blah blah
It just seems odd to say the least.
But that is just my take on the subject

-----
Corn snakes and rat snakes..No one can have just one.
"Resistance is futile"
Jimmy Johnson
(Draybar)
Draybars Snakes

_____

tspuckler Aug 14, 2008 04:14 PM

Well yeah Jimmy, everything's a suspected hybrid except for the animals that the breeder who's trying to sell you stuff is working with!
But I know what you're saying, there's a lot of hypocrisy in the hobby, though I suppose it's like that in just about any hobby - especially when there's money involved.

Tim

draybar Aug 14, 2008 06:03 PM

>>Well yeah Jimmy, everything's a suspected hybrid except for the animals that the breeder who's trying to sell you stuff is working with!
>>But I know what you're saying, there's a lot of hypocrisy in the hobby, though I suppose it's like that in just about any hobby - especially when there's money involved.
>>
>>Tim

So true Tim
So true
-----
Corn snakes and rat snakes..No one can have just one.
"Resistance is futile"
Jimmy Johnson
(Draybar)
Draybars Snakes

_____

TandJ Aug 14, 2008 08:44 PM

Jimmy, that was and is an excellent post.. No one knows whats what, and quite frankly there is no way to prove or disprove whats what.. The only thing I can do is mark honestly what I have.. Where it goes once it is out of my hands is beyond me.. Animal registration is nice, for people that have very few animals, and for some stupid reason creates a false sense of value ( that is my perception and personal opinion on the subject )..

What exactly is a pure corn? There is not an answer out there that can satisfy my curiosity.. Yeah, this is the great debate.. I came to the realization is that the mass of available corns out there have genetic influences from alien sources, and the "purists" are banging their pots and pans together and trying to ruffle feathers to make good on their hustle, err sale.. Me, I just like working with the animals, and not going to get drawn to deep into hybrid X Purist debates, because opinions are just like, well you know....

Regards.. Tim of T and J

FunkyRes Aug 14, 2008 08:54 PM

is extremely important IMHO.
Chondro breeders have been doing it for some time.

In addition to neat looking morphs, there are also serious defects (IE stargazing) and line registry helps determine what lines may also carry a defective gene when it does pop up.

The ACR currently is the only functional registry I know of - but at a certain .com that has iherp in the name, keepers can not only keep track of their feeding/shed/etc. - they are working on a species independent lineage registry that you can use. It doesn't track morphs etc. - just who the mother was and who the possible fathers were.

The size of the collection shouldn't matter, even if your record keeping is completely internal, record keeping should be part of your husbandry, record keeping can help one improve their husbandry.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

draybar Aug 15, 2008 05:31 AM

>>Jimmy, that was and is an excellent post.. No one knows whats what, and quite frankly there is no way to prove or disprove whats what.. The only thing I can do is mark honestly what I have.. Where it goes once it is out of my hands is beyond me.. Animal registration is nice, for people that have very few animals, and for some stupid reason creates a false sense of value ( that is my perception and personal opinion on the subject )..
>>
>>What exactly is a pure corn? There is not an answer out there that can satisfy my curiosity.. Yeah, this is the great debate.. I came to the realization is that the mass of available corns out there have genetic influences from alien sources, and the "purists" are banging their pots and pans together and trying to ruffle feathers to make good on their hustle, err sale.. Me, I just like working with the animals, and not going to get drawn to deep into hybrid X Purist debates, because opinions are just like, well you know....
>>
>>Regards.. Tim of T and J

Hey Tim
I know what you mean about opinions
The hybrid/pure debates have been going on for years. Just like most debates it is virtually impossible to change someone's opinion. There are things about the ACR that are OK but I think people put too much stock in the power of the ACR to recognise snakes with "foriegn" blood.
It started much too late in the game and the information the ACR has is only as good as what the people provide. And how many people out ther have no clue on the ancestry of their snakes?
-----
Corn snakes and rat snakes..No one can have just one.
"Resistance is futile"
Jimmy Johnson
(Draybar)
Draybars Snakes

_____

TandJ Aug 15, 2008 09:42 PM

"Hey Tim
I know what you mean about opinions
The hybrid/pure debates have been going on for years. Just like most debates it is virtually impossible to change someone's opinion. There are things about the ACR that are OK but I think people put too much stock in the power of the ACR to recognise snakes with "foriegn" blood.
It started much too late in the game and the information the ACR has is only as good as what the people provide. And how many people out ther have no clue on the ancestry of their snakes?"

Its a redundant arguement, when people start realizing how much of this or that has been mixed in over the years with captives they might be absolutely irrate to find that their corns at best are 99% pure with genetics from something else laying in wait, looking for the right key to express itself..

I really thought at first the ACR might be something great, until I started thinking about what i said above.. Its a nice online record keeper, but the accuracy could be way off because people simply do not know complete back grounds.. *shrugs* What do I know though, this is just our hobby..

"is extremely important IMHO.
Chondro breeders have been doing it for some time.

In addition to neat looking morphs, there are also serious defects (IE stargazing) and line registry helps determine what lines may also carry a defective gene when it does pop up.

The ACR currently is the only functional registry I know of - but at a certain .com that has iherp in the name, keepers can not only keep track of their feeding/shed/etc. - they are working on a species independent lineage registry that you can use. It doesn't track morphs etc. - just who the mother was and who the possible fathers were.

The size of the collection shouldn't matter, even if your record keeping is completely internal, record keeping should be part of your husbandry, record keeping can help one improve their husbandry."

We track and plot our own animals to the best of our own ability.. The ACR is the only public corn registry.. People have been tracking their own animals a lot longer.. Like you said, its your opinion on how useful the ACR is.. I am not going to tell you your right or wrong for that, I just can't find myself being in totally agreement with how useful it is or isn't.. I respectfully agree to disagree..

Regards.. Tim of T and J

FunkyRes Aug 16, 2008 01:06 AM

I agree - the records are only as good as the information input, and very few snakes in the ACR have lineage tracing back to wild caught. If they don't have lineage tracing back to wild caught, there is a possibility of hybrid history.

Even if they are traceable back to reputable breeders in the ACR - there is absolutely nothing stopping me from registering a corn snake stating it was bred by someone other than the real breeder, so unless the real breeder vouches for it, it only means that is who the person registering the corn claims bred it.

I need to register my female Abbott's because I will be breeding her next year. I bought her from Rob Stevens. On another forum, I posted a beautiful picture of her, and Rob mentioned that the credit actually isn't his - he sold her, but another breeder bred her. So unintentional mistakes can get in.

Last year I bought a charcoal and a caramel from Don. The Caramel came with codes for Don's stock (who produced it) - the charcoal did not. Did Don really breed the charcoal, or did he broker it for someone else? I don't know (and don't care) - but he will be listed as the breeder on the ACR form.

The ACR doesn't guarantee an animal is pure, but if someone is honest about registering a known cross, any offspring from that registered animal will be flagged as a cross regardless of how much it looks like a corn, so there is some value for honest people.

Dishonest people - they'll find a way around any registry system.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

jyohe Aug 16, 2008 07:35 AM

I breed lavenders and aztecs het lav,......I get opals and lavs and aztecs and amel aztecs and all...I keep these 4 colors....for what ? a decade and a half....now I got 2 snow-opals popped up and someone in here popped out an anery......took 15 years to pop out the genes....

I breed anery striped for awhile now...Like 7 years....I get normal het anery stripes and anery......friend got a couple het and anery kids.......he threw out 2 snow stripes the other day.....yet for 7 years I get 0 amel and 0 snow stripes(or not striped)........he got match of 2 genes lost in my animals....

.....we have no idea what's in our stuff.........

wild collected and locality will continue to rise.....(and be screwed up too).....in the future...

..
-----
......

Site Tools