Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for ZooMed
Click here for Dragon Serpents

"How the turtle got its shell"

unchikun Oct 10, 2008 01:18 PM

i thought that this was an interesting read:

By Michael Reilly
updated 1:18 p.m. ET, Wed., Oct. 8, 2008

Famous for carrying its shelled "home" on its back, the humble, plodding turtle has also been toting around one of the biggest mysteries of the animal kingdom. Paleontologists have now unearthed a bizarre fossil beast in the eastern New Mexican desert that might put that mystery to rest.

A foot long and armored from head to tail, the 215-million-year-old fossil Chinlechelys tenertesta is a missing link in turtle evolution that promises to finally settle a controversy that's been raging for the past two centuries over how turtles got their shells.

There are two camps in the debate. As turtle embryos develop, their shells grow directly from the animals' ribs, and adult turtles' ribs are fused to the shell carapace. Some scientists conclude this must have been how the shells originally developed in antiquity, too — normal rib bones gradually flattened out and spread until they formed a complete shell.

But animals like armadillos have shells that aren't attached to their ribs. Instead the shell is skin that has thickened and hardened to provide protection. This so-called "dermal armor" is also prevalent among ankylosaurs, a group of stoutly built dinosaurs that lived in the Jurassic and Cretaceous eras.

Walter Joyce of Yale University was the first to identify the new fossil as a primordial turtle from just a few bits of the neck and shell. "It's a pretty ugly fossil, really," Joyce said of the jumbled pieces he examined, "almost like a shoebox full of crud."

But the key, Joyce said, was an intact series of three neck spines, a small piece of the belly shell, and a fragment of the back shell with ribs attached.

"That's what really gave it away," Joyce said of the final piece. "You can see that the ribs are not fused to the shell."

Covered in dermal armor, the ancient turtle probably looked a lot like an ankylosaur, though the two species are unrelated. It couldn't yet retract its neck or feet, and its shell was thinner than a modern turtle's, but Chinlechelys tenertesta was bristled with sharp spines along its neck and tail.

"This is very clear evidence that the shell is a composite structure," James Parham of the Field Museum in Chicago said. "It is a missing link. This is one of the most important turtle fossils ever found, I think."

© 2008 Discovery Channel
link

Replies (2)

emysbreeder Oct 11, 2008 11:41 AM

Ive wondered about this for years and have noticed from embryo studies I have done with Manouria(looking in the eggs that dont hatch!)that the shell starts to develope very early,if not from the get go.I wonder how they determen anything from a box of crud!I always thought it was the ribs,but they think not!hummm armered skin?Anyone out there study this for a Phd? Thanks Vic.My armered beast.

unchikun Oct 13, 2008 07:23 AM

i wonder where the soft-shelled species came into play in the evolutionary scheme of things. "how the turtle lost its shell"... why develop the inner/ribs part of the shell without the outer/dermal bit? or did they have the hard outer part at some point, and for some reason lost it?

Site Tools