>>Less UVB than sun doesn't mean harmless.
And nothing you have provided proves it is harmful.
> Many species live under conditions where they don't have a lot of direct sunlight.
But definitely NOT ETB's. They are green to look like foliage so predators do not see them. That means they are lit by sunlight same as the leaves. Perhaps not direct sunlight but definitely sunlight hits their bodies.
>>
>>This picture I provided was taken by a vet friend of mine. The cage had no heating devices.
>>
First of all are we blaming the broken tooth on UVB lamps? Did you miss that? That animals is screwed, but nothing in that image says "sunburn".
Does not look like a heat problem. Looks like an infection. If the vet thinks that condition was definitely caused by UVB, then he has jumped a wild leap. He has no way to control for other causative factors including poor care at the wholesaler. He can only make a guess based on knowledge provided, and those are wrong more than right. The owner of that snake presented data based upon his opinion. Thus the vet came to the same conclusion. This idea was not made in a vacuum.
>>The cases of Bearded Dragons I heard and read about where eye
>> problems, rather than skin burns.
How was this conclusion reached in the information you provide. Can I read it?
I have animals coming into my store with 10-12 and even 15 years under zoomed 5.0 first and now 10.0 without problems. Because there is nothing bad to report nothing is reported. SO, when a problem does happen a conclusion is made (right or wrong) and then it is gospel Forget all the many thousands of reptile years bd's have been under these required lights. (a reptile years is one animal for one year) That was never considered when this conclusion was made. These lights are required by the species and those that say otherwise have found a substitute like real sunlight.
I kept lizards for years before UVB lamps were available. None reproduced, they lived, but no breeding. When UVB lamps became available, every one of my females laid eggs and I got babies. From ten species. Many females wintered for three to five years without reproducing, then all of a sudden they all reproduced. The only change? UVB lamps. They continue to breed year after year under UVB lamps. The concept of telling people they are dangerous based upon something you "read and heard about" is bad, very bad. We sell thousands of these lamps a year and see no eye problems from UVB, so even if that one individual you report had a problem it is not descriptive of the species.
>>
>>
>>About UVB in ETBs, I dont believe any snake needs it. Most
people keep/breed their ETBs with no UV.
Some snakes like Masticophis species thrive under UVB. I posted about that over in that forum.
Sure we know ETB's don't REQUIRE it. We have good evidence that they live and reproduce without it. But perhaps they'd be hardier and less "touchy" if they had it. Perhaps they'd have more babies if they had it. UVB helps hormone systems work more efficiently with proper Vit D balance and a cascade that starts from there. There are human doctors reporting UVB is essential to preventing cancer in humans. Most melanoma is found first in places the sun never sees over 99% of the time (like the perineum). The lowest incidence of skin cancer in humans in Australia is amongst the lifeguard community and highest amongst office workers. (Lifeguarding is a career down there). Sunlight is important to humans.
Because of posts like yours nobody will consider trying. Sadly, because nobody is willing to try, we will never know if you are right or wrong.
I make no conclusions and present no opinions. Just pointing out there is more to learn. To close our minds is to stop learning.
You don't need to respond to this. Your opinionis very clear to all readers.
-----
AMAZON REPTILE CENTER