Disclaimer: This post is not directed towards any one person or group.
It's funny how passionate we can get when it comes down to our personal beliefs & preferrences.
Let me begin with my personal view and then I'll follow up with a couple of links to previous UVB discussions on this forum.
I, persoanlly, can only address the UVB issue in referrence to Savannah Monitors, Nile Monitors and Bearded Dragons. That's the limit of my experience with UVB and reptiles.
As far as I know there aren't any scientific studies that prove or disprove the need for UVB among monitors & beardies. There is a popular study posted on a UK website in which they claim that their test "seem to indicate the need for UVB" (paraphrased) but it does not "prove" the need for it.
I had no previous lizard experience before I began keeping monitors & then beardies. I have raised 3 beardies from hatchlings to adulthood without UVB and without any of the problems some associate with the lack of UVB. I even used UVB for 6 months with one of these beardies to see if it could/would make a difference. It did not make a difference in the beardie's health, growth, attitude, or anything else that I could see.
When feeding my monitors and/or beardies prey items that do not have bones (calcium) I periodically dust the prey with a clacium product that has vitamin D3 in it. It appears to have worked just fine for them as I've not had any issues.
I personally know a lady that had absolutely no previous exotic animal experience whatsoever. Nothing other than cats & dogs. I told this lady all about the UVB claims in a non-biased manner. I told her how I raised mine but told her that she might ought to get a UVB light because I feel that it does appear to be a "bandaid", of sort, to some husbandry issues. She chose not to and she has succesfully raised 2 generations of beardies without UVB.
Most of the successful monitor breeders/keepers that I know of on this forum and a few other popular forums do not use UVB. Or, so they say. For the record - I don't think that I agree with 100% of any particular breeder or keeper's techniques, beliefs, etc, so I am not a blind follower of anyone or anything. I've got a mind of my own. I know how to research, experiment, and come to my own conclusions.
Roger (sidbarvin) said, "...the fact of the matter, is there simply is no conclusive evidence either confirming or denying any benefit to the use of UVB."
I made an almost identical statement a year ago in another UVB discusiion here. Roger, not to put words in your mouth, but knowing you, I think you're thinking along the same lines as I was. That line was/is - there aren't any "scientific studies" proving or disproving the need for UVB. I firmly agree & believe this. In the thread I made my statement in Frank Retes (FR) said that his many years & many generations of monitor breeding is indeed proof that UVB is not needed. Here's the link to that thread: forums.kingsnake.com/viewarch.php?id=1444152,1444152&key=2007
Here is another UVB discussion thread: forums.kingsnake.com/viewarch.php?id=1272702,1272702&key=2007
There are many more discussions, debates, on the topic that can be found by searching these forums. They will give anyone willing to take the time to search for them quite a variety of opinions from a variety of people. I strongly encourage people to take the time to read previous discussions on the matter rather than just accept a few opinions from a few people, which is about all you're gonna get from one posted question at any given time.
Roger, if I'm not mistaken, I believe that there were some eye problems with Bearded Dragons that some people were contributing to the use of some mercury vapor bulbs a few years ago. I don't know if it was the strength of the UVB rays or the light's intensity that caused those problems but I do remember seeing several posts on a few Bearded Dragon forums about it. 
By the way, Roger - Good post.
Thanks for giving me the chance to jump in without being offensive to anyone.
Let me sum up my personal thoughts, beliefs: I believe that if a keeper does what they're supposed to be doing (have good husbandry and an ability to interpret their captive's actions & reactions) there is no need for UVB lighting.
Earlier I said that I feel that UVB is a type of "bandaid" to one's husbandry. It does appear to aid poor husbandry. Actually, I think FR addressed this quite well in the fist link I posted above. UVB seems to mask or hide poor husbandry. I'd rather see the signs of my poor husbandry so I can make the necessary adjustment instead of hiding them.
I do feel that it's important to mention that there are some reports of calcium overdosing among animals kept with UVB lighting. This is the flip-side of the coin from a calcium deficiency among non UVB users. It's also worth noting that calcium deficiency does occur even when UVB is used. I interpret all of that as being husbandry related, not a UVB issue.
Ya'll behave yourselves!
HH
-----
Due to political correctness run amuck,
this ol' hillbilly is now referred to as an:
Appalachian American

www.natures-signature.com