Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You

Some Thoughts on Husbandry and Genetics

Tony D Dec 05, 2008 04:41 PM

In response to FR going off on FunkyRes about poor muscle tone in one of his females, I'm going to categorically say that not everything is related to husbandry.

On several occasions I've raised sibling animals in identical conditions and fed them identical diets with varying results. Sometimes one would grow big and fast and another would grow slow and fat. Sometimes most will be strong and robust while the odd one will have poor muscle tone. When everything else is controlled for and you get different results genetics is at the root of the problem.

Now Frank will rightly come back and say that if you gave them enough choices they could choose the unique conditions that best suite them as individuals and the problem will self correct. This is largely true but it is certainly not absolute or we would never find animals of sub par conditions in the wild where they have more choices than any keeper ever dreamt of providing.

Frank's point, which I'm sure he thinks I missed, is that you can adjust husbandry for individual animals such that across your collection you can achieve better results than if you stick to "cookbook" methods. On this point I completely agree but there is a larger question here and that is SHOULD you baby these genetic outliers in order to induce them to reproduce? Frank apparently thinks so. Given that we know the vast majority of the animals we produce will receive "cookbook" care (or sadly less) I'm not so sure its prudent to produce offspring from stock that is not completely fit for the conditions they will most likely be maintained under?
-----
Darwin Rocks!

Replies (55)

FunkyRes Dec 05, 2008 05:04 PM

I should note that in that female, she may not have had sub standard muscle tone.

All captive constricting snakes I have ever handled, raised by me or someone else, have not been as strong as wild counterparts.

That, btw, is another reason to suspect they may spend less time under cover than we think - wild constrictors are muscular.

But anyway - they are not as strong as their wild counterparts, just like your typical city slicker is not as strong as a good old country boy.

I did notice my snakes that feed exclusively on f/t do not appear to be as strong as the few I have that refuse f/t and insist upon live.

Was that what caused her egg binding? I doubt it. While I did not have a necropsy done, I think she was blocked. I think she was blocked because seven eggs came out and two remained up the pipe without having moved down. Either there was something obstructing them, the first was unusually big, or they were joined.

The contents were extracted and they still not move down, so the next day she got a shot of oxytocin. Then they did move down, she died with them at the vent. So extracting their contents and giving her hormone did get them to move, they just did not come all the way out.

According to several sites, when eggs remain in the female, they harden rather quickly - so it's possible that had she had oxytocin the day the contents were extracted she may have been able to get them out, I don't know.

But I think there was a physical blockage preventing them from coming down naturally until their contents were removed. I don't know, that's just my suspicion.

I am using live now in case it was muscle tone related, after reading the experience of Kathy Love's friends with reduced dystocia after switching to live prey.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

ChristopherD Dec 05, 2008 05:52 PM

from what i have experienced Oxyotcin has only proved in live bearers .C

BobS Dec 05, 2008 06:02 PM

From my experience Oxyotcin has never been very helpful when I've taken snakes to the vet (Mostly Ratsnakes and Kings/milks)

FunkyRes Dec 05, 2008 07:02 PM

I think the vet must have known or suspected that then because he said he only wanted to do it as a last ditch effort if extracting the egg contents didn't work.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

jyohe Dec 05, 2008 07:35 PM

how long did the vet wait after aspiration to try again or try oxytocin???

.I took just one snake to a vet......it died from shock that night......vet didn't listen to what I told him to do....did what I told him NOT to do.....she went into total shock while he had it in hand....you could see it....

......

..
-----
......
..........
.............

LOL......

FunkyRes Dec 05, 2008 07:39 PM

I believe I did the aspiration within 48 hours of the lay. I'll have to look.

When the eggs hadn't moved, I went back the next day to get the oxytocin. The oxytocin was suppose to stimulate her contractions - which it did do, and they moved down, but she died with them at the vent.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

jyohe Dec 05, 2008 07:43 PM

......I read it too fast.I thought you wrote "she died with them at the vet "

..once at the vent you can usually get them out without too much trouble...usually...

...she would have died anyways....at that point it didn't matter......

.....did she bleed?

...did anyoje else have females die after having injection of oxytocin???? (never tried it)...

.
.
.
-----
......
..........
.............

LOL......

jyohe Dec 05, 2008 07:33 PM

exercise......

......oxytocin doesn't help..it makes the eggs want out, body want them out, and they still cannot move, making it worse...

they do get hard...it takes weeks usually

most will not die in a few days...it takes a week or two

I had one or a couple die in like 2 or three days...

don't remember any bleeding from vent

aspiration of stuck eggs/ ovum does help....collapsed eggs are smaller, and shoving a needle into them makes them react and give off adrenaline? and or other hormones?/

...after aspiration, if eggs do not move down and or out,,,yes they will and can grow full sized again in the oviduct....

yes the oviduct is so thin it can twist or make a small buckling in itself while eggs are being moved down it.......when eggs are stuck...never push them towards vent they say.....some people push them a little towards the head to help take out buckling in the oviduct....to align it again....

females will get tired while laying (lack of exercise)...and stop before all have been evacuated........

...there are sooo many variables ...but proper diet and exercise would help it all........again.I should know......I should weigh 145 pounds??? and I am like 50 ove that....you would think I am strong after carrying around an extra bag of potatoes all the time....I guess smoking helps take that awy too???...

yes...small cages and too much food are killing us, our snakes, and our dogs and cats also.....

........I know a guy that used to house adult female corns 2 to a cage so they made each other workout more.......it worked....

..

..people hate puppy mills ...wait till they see what we all do?????????????
-----
......
..........
.............

LOL......

jyohe Dec 05, 2008 07:22 PM

..........small cages make weak snakes....no exercise....
.........weak snakes still lay eggs that hatch....

..........I would know.......

too many snakes ....not enough room.......

.....and yes, snakes in the same cage size fed same diet from same clutch will be all very different....balls are really proof of this one.....

.
.
.
.
.
-----
......
..........
.............

LOL......

CrimsonKing Dec 05, 2008 09:42 PM

Hey Tony... I think that even wild snakes..given as many choices as can be found...still make the wrong choices from time to time and fail. That is part of life in the wild. Wrong choices may equal death. Can they not fail in captivity too? I mean, even if we give them choices??? Also, has their evolution stopped entirely just because they are in captivity?
Certainly each is still an individual and carries some of the stuff of their parental lineage.
Has anyone here given their charges the choice of an escapable cage? How did that choice work out?
There's no real point to my ramblings..just some thoughts..
:Mark
-----
Surrender Dorothy!

crimsonking.piczo.com/

Tony D Dec 07, 2008 07:39 AM

Well the primary point of my post was that all issues related to poor captive performance do not rest with husbandry but your point that poor performance in wild pop may also be due to poor choice is taken.
-----
Darwin Rocks!

FR Dec 06, 2008 12:55 AM

No offense, but your post is nothing but a whole bunch of rationalizations.

Arn't suppose to respect the snake for what it is, NOT keep it if it fits our bad cages. Sorry, but your point here is very narsisistic(all about you).

In this you miss the entire makeup of these snakes. Naturally, they all pick the temps and conditions they require. All of them, all the time or they perish. Those conditions fit into a very "normal" range, thats easily acquired in their habitat, or they perish. Its how they pick these conditions that is regional(local specific) and individual. Its, you know, behavioral.

what your totally ignoring is how this behavior works, its part inhereted and part learned.

This makeup is what makes them, THEM. So you want to change them to FIT YOU? If that is the case, why not collect stamps or some other non living THING.

I fully understand, you may not have the understanding to be able to fit your husbandry to the snake, so you must have them FIT you. That is great for you. But its not for me. I really enjoy and respect the species and individual differences that each snake has. If I have to THINK or WORK to fit that snake, then that is what I should do. This is most likely key to why I have so many world firsts in reptile breeding. I think about the animal, and not the other way around.

The thought that we should CULL them to fit crappy recipe showbox setups is HORRIFYING to me. I guess thats why you would not keep a racer or varanid. Those animals require some keeper understanding and we must bend our thoughts and methods to fit them.

You are right on one thing, you and I ARE different and no wonder you challenge me at every turn, You seem to want the animals to fit you and I respect them for what they are and think we should do whatever we can to accomodate their needs.

All I can say to this post of yours is, I hope it works for you, because your outlook surely does not work for me. Cheers

FunkyRes Dec 06, 2008 01:05 AM

The thought that we should CULL them to fit crappy recipe showbox setups is HORRIFYING to me.

I don't think we should cull them. I do think we should do our best to get them to eat. In my case with the young from those Redding snakes it meant spenting time hunting sceloporus, and when I breed them, it means collecting gravid sceloporus ahead of time.

I do think though that we need to take feeding habits into consideration, even when we keep them in large vivarium, because I can guarantee the vast majority of people out there buying what we produce are going to keep them in small vivariums, often with just aspen, a single hide, and a single water dish.

Should we then not intentionally try to produce offspring that do well in those conditions?

Domestic dogs are selectively bred wolves. I guarantee that more people are able to properly care for a Golden Retriever than a Wolf.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

indictment Dec 06, 2008 02:51 AM

FR: No offense, but what have you pioneered lately? You throw your narcissistic phrases around like "when i was the first" all the time. Well, how 'bout it? What have you pioneered lately.

Again, I mean no offense as I have no clue what exactly you are credited with, but being the first to pioneer specific traits 40-30 years ago doens't sound liekt aht big of an accomplishment......The hobby wasn't nearly as big as it is today or even 20 years ago. Sounds like you were in the right hobby at the right time.

Also, I didn't see any evidance that led me to believe that FunkyRes was trying to amke his snakes adjust to his demands (other than the demands that coexist with captivity).

And you accuse him of rationalizing......you're basing all of his husbandry methods on one case of egg binding. And it appears he went above and beyond to try to save the girl.

"Sorry, but your point here is very narsisistic(all about you)." ----this occurs in every one of your posts. And then assuming we don't know what the word means ironically makes you seem narcissistic.....and yet you still manage to mispell the word every time.
-----
2.4.0 Leopard Geckos
0.1.0 California Kingsnake
0.1.0 Copperhead
1.1.0 Eastern Box Tutles

FR Dec 06, 2008 08:14 AM

Varanids, Cheers

FR Dec 06, 2008 08:44 AM

You had one weak clutch and you are making all manner of deductions and assumptions. My bet is, the next clutch if kept healthy will have young that consume pinkies without problem.

You see, this is the point. YOU HAVE ONE CLUTCH and you are all over the place looking for answers. ONE CLUTCH! Your making causes and effects and cures and directions. Dude, its one weak clutch. Get over it and take better care of the adults and this would not happen.

Do you think your the only one who has bred Redding kings, or kings from other areas in their range? Kings from places that have smaller adults? YOUR NOT. Your not even close. YOU ARE A BEGINER in a area that has been done to death.

Do you think your the only person who has had lizard feeders? Your not, and your not even close. Your only off by forty years and tens of thousands of clutches. History has shown that healthy calkings will consume pinkies, RIGHT OUT OF THE EGG.

Narsisistic means you think its all about you. Why I use that term is, you have one clutch and you think its special over the hundreds of thousands of clutches all others have had. Is there any real reason for that? or are you too special to have, not so healthy adults??????? As far as I know, all of us can and DO. So why can't you? Even the best of us make these mistakes, even if we know better. But it cannot happen to you? WHY?

Dude, my good friend purchased a bunch of kings this year, some from folks here. One group came in a little weak and would not eat pinkies, live dead or modified. So he gave them to me, I had them fat and pinkie feeding in two weeks and all without one lizard. But I would have if I had too.

Sir, weak hatchlings are COMMON and they commonly become picky. All you have to do is offer some slightly better choices.

Again, naturally these snakes CAN pick what they need or perish. In captivity, they can only pick from what we give them, or PERISH. That you think a simple set up(little choice) is good for all individuals and all genetics is NAIVE.

The average setup these days is good for the average snake. Which is great unless your snake is not average.

ALso, theres no problem keeping them in an average way, that is until you have a problem, then you SHOULD know that all you have to do is offer more until their health has recovered.

Or you can offer them choices all the time. Then you do not have to worry about the non average snake. In fact, you then get to enjoy the non average snake, Which I beleive is much better then worrying and making all manner of deductions and cures and rationalizations.

We are different, You believe YOU. I do not believe me. I will just keep trying until the reptiles respond. WHY you ask, because they know more about them then I do.

More naive rationalizations. You stated, wild snakes have better muscle tone. OF FRIGGIN COURSE THEY DO. Then you stated that makes you believe they do not spend as much time as I think under cover. How stinking silly is that statement. They live undercover, they exercise undercover, they eat, grow, breed, etc undercover. Do you really think shiny smooth scales are designed for spending lots of time in the open or for crawling through holes, cracks and crevices(earth cracks for cal kings). Then what do you think big thick keeled scales are for? you know like rattlesnake scales? Hmmmmmmmmmm there must be a reason they are so different.

If kings spend lots of time out in the open, then why do all these experienced kingsnake collectors always collect Artificial cover. hmmmmmmm You would think they would simply walk around picking them up. Ask Patton why? Cheers and good luck sir.

FunkyRes Dec 06, 2008 01:50 PM

You see, this is the point. YOU HAVE ONE CLUTCH and you are all over the place looking for answers. ONE CLUTCH! Your making causes and effects and cures and directions. Dude, its one weak clutch. Get over it and take better care of the adults and this would not happen.

The the umpteenth time - it was NOT a weak clutch.
They ate just fine - they just didn't want what was on the menu.

They fed eagerly when offered lizards.

Explain to me how eagerly feeding equates to a weak clutch.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

FunkyRes Dec 06, 2008 01:56 PM
Some of the gray-banded kingsnakes may not be feeding on pink mice. We will make every effort to get these animals to feed on pink mice before selling them, but that can be difficult. Gray-banded kingsnakes not feeding voluntarily on pink mice will be offered at reduced prices. They will have been given lizards or force-fed before we sell them, and this will be accurately reported to you. Also provided, upon request, will be a care sheet with helpful hints on getting the animal to feed on its own.

http://www.merkerreptiles.com/currentavailable.htm

Does Merker, who has been into reptile husbandry for a very long time, have weak clutches?
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

thomas davis Dec 06, 2008 07:57 PM

alterna and getula are VERY different funky ask merker he'll tell ya.
why get offended at someone who has hatched 1000's of clutches of calkings saying it was simply a weak clutch? i dun get it??? try the choices thing temps(as big a range as you can get), hides including verticals tight to spacious with a variety of substrates from dry to moist, etc,etc. it really works, the snakes are happier and healthier as well i have F5plus calkings ive been working with for years many (most) do great w/your standard shoebox setups(born,raised,bred,etc) but if you wanna see them thrive give them as many choices as possible thats all FR is saying imho. like with plants you can grow a plant in just dirt, prep that dirt with fertilizer and that plant will thrive, so choices for our charges are like fertilizer for plants it just make them mo'betta,,,,,,,,,thomas davis
-----
Morphs... just like baseball cards BUT ALIVE, how cool is that???

my website www.barmollysplace.com

FunkyRes Dec 06, 2008 09:04 PM

why get offended at someone who has hatched 1000's of clutches of calkings saying it was simply a weak clutch?

He has absolutely no evidence to say it was a weak clutch.
They are quite healthy and always has been.

He sits there and says I'm making assumptions based upon too little data and then concludes that snakes he has never seen are a "weak clutch".

Yes, I have a problem with that.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

FR Dec 07, 2008 09:15 AM

You simply do not understand ANYTHING. Experience is not gained from success alone, Success is gained from learning from failure. You learn more from failure then success. This is something you are stubborn to understand, so you again rationalize. You rationalize that I never make mistakes and have never had weak clutches.

As mentioned, I know all about weak clutches, from having them. Think about it, 1000's of clutches. That means, I not only had them, but have plenty of oppertunity to learn how to fix them. Guezz your silly. Cheers

FunkyRes Dec 07, 2008 11:57 AM

As mentioned, I know all about weak clutches, from having them.

How good was your record keeping?
You admit to having plenty of your own "weak" clutches.

I really have to wonder if some of those were F1/F2/F3 from particularly localities that don't fit your model, and your own selective breeding and outcrossing to locales that did better with rodents resulted in a reduction and/or elimination of the lizard eaters.

Maybe you have drawn a wrong conclusion as to why you did not see it in later years.

It would be interesting to see actual studies done under controlled conditions that involve the collection and breeding of F1 locality snakes from various localities and see how the behavior of the neonates differs.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

FR Dec 07, 2008 12:58 PM

Do you actually read your own posts, if you do, you will see the pattern of taking the easy way out. I who have bred this species for over four decades, is being questioned over your one clutch. Sir, that is plain silly.

Your still looking at every avenue that does not put responsibility on you.

It still boils down to this, only you have found a cal king local that normally eats lizards(and from one clutch, no less). The rest of us that have bred local after local, have only found that if we do not do our job, some of our hatchlings will be weak. And if cal kings are really weak, they will be lizard feeders. Your amazing dude. Cheers

FunkyRes Dec 07, 2008 04:29 PM

The rest of us that have bred local after local, have only found that if we do not do our job, some of our hatchlings will be weak. And if cal kings are really weak, they will be lizard feeders. Your amazing dude. Cheers

That doesn't jive with what I've read elsewhere.

On another forum, the origin of the Palimar locality Ghost was discussed. You don't find the locality morph anymore. They were, according to what I read, extremely difficult to rear - so they outcrossed them with other lines in order to get the ghost gene into lines that were easier to rear.

Same thing as what is documented with bloodred in corns. They were notorious lizard feeders out of the egg, selective breeding and outcrossing has resulted in bloodreds which are better at taking mice out of the egg. Caramels and the locality Miami phase have similar reputations, reputations vouched for by breeders with a lot of experience. You can read about Miami's and their lizard tendency in Kathy's book, for example.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

indictment Dec 07, 2008 07:16 PM

Isn't this also similar with hognose snakes..........concerning the Easterns and Westerns?
-----
2.4.0 Leopard Geckos
0.1.0 California Kingsnake
0.1.0 Copperhead
1.1.0 Eastern Box Tutles

FunkyRes Dec 07, 2008 07:19 PM

I don't know about westerns - but Easterns, apparently some lines NEED amphibians in their diet or they end up going blind and dying, while other lines do just fine on rodent diet.

Westerns I think all do fine on rodent diet, though I don't know if some prefer other things out of the egg.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

indictment Dec 07, 2008 07:27 PM

That's a shame, I really prefer the colors of the Easterns over the Westerns (wierd, I know).......does anybody know if anything can be done like supplementing mice with the required nutrients to ensure proper eyesight/other needs?
-----
2.4.0 Leopard Geckos
0.1.0 California Kingsnake
0.1.0 Copperhead
1.1.0 Eastern Box Tutles

FunkyRes Dec 07, 2008 08:16 PM

If you have access to wild toads, collect a bunch and freeze them (assuming it is legal where you are) - I understand they do well with a diet of f/t toads.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

Tony D Dec 07, 2008 08:29 PM

"The rest of us that have bred local after local, have only found that if we do not do our job, some of our hatchlings will be weak. And if cal kings are really weak, they will be lizard feeders."

While weak hatchling may take lizards before mice but not all lizard feeders are weak and you know that. Come on Frank play fair.
-----
Darwin Rocks!

FR Dec 07, 2008 08:59 AM

No offense, but I also pioneered the breeding of greybands, check around(read Denny Millers Greyband manual, 1975 or so)(he mentioned me producing 200 a year, WAY BACK THEN). I had no problem getting them to feed on pinkies. Oh I did when I first started. But I learned.

Also all you have to do is look at baby greybands and you can tell which ones are lizard feeders, the small skinny ones, hahahahahahahahaha.

Of course, a much higher percentage of greybands can become lizard feeders, the reason is very obvious, they hatch out much smaller and weaker. But here we are talking about CAL KINGS.

If you also check around, there are folks who have lots of problems and other folks who do not. Which means, some folks have marginal husbandry, and some have better husbandry.

In your case, you are very much a pioneer, you have found the only population of CAL KINGS, that is normally lizard feeders. And you found them from producing ONE CLUTCH. Skill or luck, I wonder.

I have produced thousands of calking clutches over my lifetime and I can without question produce weak babies(which is why I know what I am talking about). What makes you so darn good, particularly when your friggin NEW????????????????????????????????? That you know its genetics from one clutch?

Sir, you do not have a screw loose in your head, you have one thats rusted in, and its saying, your toooooo good/smart to ever cause a problem. The problem is, you keep mentioning normal captive problems that are products of poor/marginal husbandry, and the animals are in your care, so they ARE YOUR Mistakes. Sir, your new and your going to keep making mistakes. Experience is the porduct of lots and lots of learning from making mistakes. Get over it.

You see, reading something is not experience, reading something only makes you aware of something. Doing it is where experience comes from. Doing it produces a product and that product is the measure of your effort. The point of all my posts are, you keep making mistakes(normal ones) but you refuse to take responsibility for them, you blame all manner of things other then you. Bud, those snakes are IN YOUR CAGE, which makes all mistakes/problems, yours. (your successes are yours too)

When your snake died from eggbinding, at first you blamed it on folks using dogfood instead of lab chow. Then frozen mice instead of live mice. When you have a clutch of lizard feeding getula, you blamed it on genetics of some silly local.

To become a good keeper, you must identify patterns, I am seeing a very clear pattern with you. You make mistakes and you blame it on everything but you.

While there is a very small chance you are not at fault, your problems are clearly problems that are common with new keepers. And are directly related to inexperience and lack of husbandry skills. Which is normal for the new.

Another pattern, you are new to this, yet your always answering questions from those with problems. What's funny is, many of those asking have far more experience then you. Sir, your very intelligent, but not being all that smart. Sir you read and you research, the problem is this is an applied science, to actually know, is to do and do and do(repeated successful results). To know(be smart) is the accumulation of successful results. Sir, this is not a theoretical science, its applied. Its like chemistry, you have to pass lab to pass the course.

YES, I have a problem, and its this. I cannot figure out how you know so much from so little. It kinda makes me feel stupid. I mean, what a waste, I have only bred cal kings for 44 years and you know more from a couple of clutches. I mean, I have bred them from all parts of their range, from the north to the south, east and west, pure, crossed them, all manner of genetics and you are so good, you can tell me all about them from WHAT, three clutches. I know I am not all that smart, but come on, give me a break. I cannot be that dumb. Cheers

FR Dec 07, 2008 08:15 AM

For the millionth time, thats what weak clutches/individuals do.

This is another of your weird points, because they eat lizards makes them strong. Boy do you need some experience.

You know they were not weak because you have tons of experience? I have a question, do they eat pinkies fuzzies NOW, if so, WHY? Then why not when they were LITTLE hatchlings, hahahahahahahahahahahaha Cheers

FunkyRes Dec 07, 2008 11:41 AM

They are eating rodents now
They were eating rodents within a few months of hatching.

Adults of most species are generalists. Neonates out of the egg of many species are quite a bit more picky.

There are natural selection reasons for this.

If lizard prey is plenty, the neonates that go after lizards avoid mice are more likely to survive and breed. Adult rodents protect their nest. As they grow, the liklihood of getting away with the meal increases, so the neonates that become generalist then increase their liklihood of survival.

How well that works is undoubtedly locality dependent. The rodent populations are different, available reptilian prey differs, competition for reptilian prey differs, competition for rodent prey differs, etc.

You still have not explained how refusing mice but eagerly feeding upon lizards makes them weak.

I've never force fed any of them, never needed to. They ate on their own and eagerly ate on their own, and they did well and are doing well. They are not weak.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

FR Dec 07, 2008 01:01 PM

So once they fed and became stronger, their inhereted knowledge went away(from lizard feeders to rodent feeders). Oh how many meals did it take. Did they become adults before they became mouse feeders?

You sir are the best rationalizer I have ever seen. Cheers

FunkyRes Dec 07, 2008 02:45 PM

Are you suggesting they ate lizards but refused mice because they were not strong enough out of the egg?

If that is what you are suggesting, then feeding them lizards was the right thing to do and there was nothing wrong with my husbandry.

How does that correspond with species of Lampropeltis that regularly refuse rodents out of the egg yet are generalist as adults. Do they just produce "weaker" clutches?

Catching and subduing a young sceloporus takes a lot more effort than catching and subduing a mouse pinky.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

FR Dec 07, 2008 05:44 PM

No one said that was not the right thing to do. I merely question you placing blame on everything but you.

Also we are talking about CAL KINGS. In your effort to escape responsibility, you seem to want to enclude anything you can.

The actual truth is, its no big deal, except your effort to place blame.

Its very simple, try something else, repeat the same thing over and see what results you get, etc. But to place blame with so little information is not very smart. Doing that will surely limit YOUR progress. You doing that will do nothing to me. Cheers

FunkyRes Dec 07, 2008 05:34 PM

For those interested, I thought I'd describe what local herps are. IE - herps in walking distance from my pad.

This has no bearing on the argument, but I thought I'd describe the local herp fauna, as it may have some bearing on what the local kings eat in the wild.

The most abundant local herp that I have seen is the Western Fence Lizard. They are everywhere. The second most abundant herp I have seen would be the sharp-tailed snake, Contia tenuis. For those not familiar, they are a fairly small snake - as adults, usually under a foot in length but I have found a few bigger. Here's a young one:

I suspect they make up a good portion of the diet of neonate kings. I do not make a habit of causing herps I find to regurgitate though, so I don't know. With the exception of really cold periods, when it rains - you will find them. You will find them dead all over the road, and live under just about anything.

These are far more abundant here than any other locale I have ever found them (mostly SFBA - primarily Contra Costa County)

After the sharp-tailed snakes, California Alligator Lizards would be next:

They probably are fed upon by kings when young, adult Elgaria may be fed upon by large kings but they can put up a decent fight. I've never personally witnessed an encounter but I have heard field reports of them, the alligator lizards are good at defending themselves against smaller kings and with larger kings, they will grab their hind leg in their jaw and make a loop (behavior I've witnessed when herping) making it nearly impossible for a king to consume them.

Western Skinks are more common during the spring than alligator lizards but less common the rest of the year.

Most of that size don't have such a blue tail. They undoubtedly are fed upon by kings, wherever I find them - there are kings.

After the skinks, the reptile I come across most often is probably the Mountain Garter Snake. I do find them in some locations where there are kings, they probably make up some of the king diet.

After Mountain Garters, it's hard to say if Kings or Gophers are more common. I find more live kings, but I find almost as many DOR gophers as DOR kings. Possibly more, hard to say, I don't count. I also don't have a salvage permit, so I can't collect DOR herps to see what they ate.

After the kings/gophers - probably western pond turtles. I'm not counting the maintained population in the pond at Turtle Bay, I don't count them since they are largely released offspring of what Turtle Bay breeds (and unfortunately Turtle Bay's breeding stock is only mostly locality, they do have some pond turtles that I know for a fact do not originate here. Maybe the genetic diversity is good for the wild population though). I do know of a few wild populations of the turtle, but never have gotten close enough for voucher photograph before they go under. One is a pond used for drainage by a shopping center, I have also rarely seen adults (but never young) in a local creek infested by bullfrogs.

I doubt pond turtles are part of the lampro diet, but their eggs could be.

After pond turtles, probably red eared sliders.

Then there is the Valley Garter - I found one alive and one baby DOR garter that I suspect was a valley garter. I'm surprised I have not found more valley garters.

Herps I suspect I have seen - on one occasion I saw a glimpse of the tail of snake that I believe to have been a western yellow-bellied racer. It was on the bank of a creek that was right next to a field that almost mirrored the field where I used to find lots of them in the SFBA. It may have been a garter, but I think it was a western yellow-bellied racer. Unfortunately that field is private property, and the chances of me herping it are nill because the land owner yelled at me to get out of his creek (I checked - public has right of way through the creek, which goes between his land and public land - the public land is the bank of a public road).

I also on one occasion believe I have seen an Oregon Garter Snake. It eluded capture so I can not positive ID but it did not look like a valley or a mountain, though I would prefer to have one in hand before I say they are here.

Herps I know are here but have not encountered:

Northern Pacific Rattlesnake. I know they are on the Sacramento River Trail. I suspect most eye witness accounts are false, but I know some are valid. I have found them outside of my walking distance.

Shasta Alligator Lizard - according to paid staffers at Turtle Bay, they are here. I believe them.

I think there *may* be zonata in the BLM land walking distance from my home - east side of sac river south of the shasta Dam. If I recall correctly my conversation with Hubbs - his comment was along the lines of "good luck finding them there". He's probably right. Elevation is below 1,000 feet for most of it. There probably are Shasta Alligator Lizards there, though - much of it is certainly riparian enough.

-=-

Amphibians - most abundant is Pacific Treefrog.

American Bullfrog unfortunately takes a close second.

Western Toads after that, and one creek within walking distance of home still has a population of Foothill Yellow-legged frogs.

I've been looking for California Red-legged frogs. I understand there are some museum specimens from the marsh that was drained to build Shasta Mall. I would LOVE to find a population of them that has survived the building of this city and bullfrog onslaught. So far, every site that looks promising for them is over-run by bullfrogs.

I have not seen a single salamander or newt within walking distance of my home. No slenders, no ensatina's, no rough-skinned newts.

One of my goals this year is to find the Shasta Salamander, but I do not believe they are walking distance from my home.

-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

FunkyRes Dec 07, 2008 05:36 PM

There also are no ringneck snakes here.
I was surprised, but no one else I have talked to has ever found them here either, including the biology instructor at Shasta College who has been looking for them for years before I moved here. I suspect the lack of salamanders has something to do with that.

They are east of here as you go up into the mountains (but then, so are salamanders)
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

indictment Dec 07, 2008 07:22 PM

This has no bearing on the issue at hand, but that Alligator lizard is is downright handsome...........very nice! Did you find that particular one yourself?
-----
2.4.0 Leopard Geckos
0.1.0 California Kingsnake
0.1.0 Copperhead
1.1.0 Eastern Box Tutles

FunkyRes Dec 07, 2008 08:15 PM

Yes - I found her.

I'm assuming "her" as the head is not very wide.

I think that's the reddest alligator lizard I've ever found up here.

No - I did not collect her. I rarely collect.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

Tony D Dec 06, 2008 03:21 PM

Yes but keeping wild animals in captivity is narsisistic period. In order to keep them we are rationalize our love or appriciation to some degree.
-----
Darwin Rocks!

FR Dec 07, 2008 09:09 AM

I do not totally dissagree with that, but to cull them to fit your "average" methods is not acceptable. You(we) are narsisistic to put a wild animal in a box. But to kill(cull) off some because they do not fit that box, takes narsisistic to another level. Cheers

Tony D Dec 07, 2008 02:15 PM

I never said I cull them to meet this average. I just questioned whether they should be bred if they don't thrive in the average condition. I don't breed corns with poor color why should I breed one with poor muscle tone when others of the same line are robust? Whenever I get a new animal I always consider it a "potential" breeder. Sometimes they just don't perform exactly as I would like and they are moved out as pets. I see nothing wrong with that.
-----
Darwin Rocks!

FR Dec 07, 2008 05:27 PM

The only thing wrong is, all you have to do is add a little range to their choices and you have healthy robust animals. Its not the snakes(in 99% of the cases) its marginal husbandry thats the problem.

I still wonder what average husbandry has to do with snakes(any reptile) I must be wrong, but I always thought we should give an effort for the health of a wild animal.

The truth is, it is normal for all but very unhealthy reptiles to reproduce. In otherwords, to reproduce is the minimum measure of health, not the maximum. There are many degrees of reproduction that indicate maximum health.

In nature its the quality of recruitment, not simple recruitment. Cheers

FunkyRes Dec 07, 2008 05:38 PM

In otherwords, to reproduce is the minimum measure of health, not the maximum.

That I agree with.
-----
Arrrggg!
It's like Shalom, but for pirates.
- iCarly

Tony D Dec 07, 2008 07:50 PM

I think for once we're talking on the same page even if our approach is different. I have a very specific performance I look for in my animals and if they don't fit that they are moved to others how may work with them as breeders or somebody who will just keep them as pets. If there is a problem in the hobby it isn't that too few animals owned by breeders are recruited into the breeding population its that too many do. Its as if there is no selection pressure at all unless you count whatever is in vogue ie morphs, locality, hybrids..... I'm not saying that what I do is right or wrong but I do like to insert a little higher level criteria into my breeder selection.

As for the standard cookbook method, I think its getting a bit of a bum rap here of late. Properly done almost all snakes will thrive in basic setups. A lot of problems people have stem from them not getting the basics right in the first place. They need to get this down before moving onto something more complex and maintenance intensive but them that is just my opinion.
-----
Darwin Rocks!

Bluerosy Dec 09, 2008 12:56 PM

I think keeping w/c snakes in captivity is narsistic. With captive born and unatural selection they would never even exist. Thus no harm no foul.

Great read BTW!

indictment Dec 09, 2008 07:34 PM

Agreed, but our motives are narcisstic. "owning a another life"
-----
2.4.0 Leopard Geckos
0.1.0 California Kingsnake
0.1.0 Copperhead
1.1.0 Eastern Box Tutles

Bluerosy Dec 09, 2008 08:31 PM

Agreed, but our motives are narcisstic. "owning a another life"

Depends on how you believe. I beleive God put animals here for us.

FR Dec 10, 2008 08:42 AM

Why not, god put animals here, including us?

The, "animals for our use", may have been an add on(another human rationalization) done by others.

But then, the word religion, means to believe without reason(blindly follow). As in, no proof. So there is no real use in talking about this, hahahahahahahha

The reality is, humans are using the world, including its animals, to death. I am not sure god would like that. Cheers

Tony D Dec 10, 2008 01:06 PM

you said something I completely agree with. Stand by for heavy seas and high winds folks, hell is about to freeze over!
-----
Darwin Rocks!

Bluerosy Dec 10, 2008 05:29 PM

Well you either beleive or don't beleive in the big "G".

Tony D Dec 11, 2008 10:37 AM

Whether you believe that all this (life) started out of pure chance or as the result of divine influence is irrelevant as both concepts require a HUGE leap of faith. Its making judgments based on hocus-pocus theology, associated with the latter, that I see as complete cop out. Asserting that one of the reasons God created snakes is so that we can be happy keeping them in plastic boxes just avoids the issue completely.
-----
Darwin Rocks!

FR Dec 12, 2008 11:42 AM

Tony and I on the same side, OH GOD!

BobS Dec 10, 2008 03:30 PM

Snake master you are, and I learn alot listening to you and appreciate your experience and it's in the best interest of my animals to be open to learning new things.I too also believe that you have probably forgotten more than alot of us know. I also appreciate that everyone has the right to believe or not to believe. "But your Data is flawed sir" 1Frank3:16 ha ha ha hahha! LOL

–noun 1. a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
2. a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3. the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices: a world council of religions.
4. the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.: to enter religion.
5. the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.
6. something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience: to make a religion of fighting prejudice.
7. religions, Archaic. religious rites.
8. Archaic. strict faithfulness; devotion: a religion to one's vow.
—Idiom9. get religion, Informal. a. to acquire a deep conviction of the validity of religious beliefs and practices.
b. to resolve to mend one's errant ways: The company got religion and stopped making dangerous products.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Origin:
1150–1200; ME religioun (< OF religion) < L religiôn- (s. of religiô) conscientiousness, piety, equiv. to relig(âre) to tie, fasten (re- re- ligâre to bind, tie; cf. ligament ) -iôn- -ion; cf. rely
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
Cite This Source

indictment Dec 10, 2008 06:50 PM

Just because it's "devinely justified" doesn't mean it's not humanely narcisstic.
-----
2.4.0 Leopard Geckos
0.1.0 California Kingsnake
0.1.0 Copperhead
1.1.0 Eastern Box Tutles

Site Tools