Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for ZooMed
Click here for Dragon Serpents

Enrichment

viborero Dec 24, 2008 11:01 AM

OK, we've gone over group dynamics in captivity. What about enrichment for single captive snakes? Do our solo snakes suffer from boredom? Is it lack of stimulation or lack of company? Both?

I know that whenever I rearrange an enclosure, or maybe add a rock or branch that was outside, my snakes tongue-flick like crazy and spend hours cruising around, checking out the new textures and scents.

Is human interaction enough for our snakes?

Little food for thought there.

I sincerely hope everyone has a wonderful Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa - whatever you may be into - with your loved ones!!


-----
Diego

SWCHR

Replies (58)

Jeff Schofield Dec 24, 2008 12:50 PM

Webster's defines anthropomorphism : an interpretation of what is not human or personal in terms of human or personal characteristics. Feelings, boredom,etc are human charecteristics.

viborero Dec 24, 2008 01:10 PM

...so stop selling it. I refuse to believe that humans are the only animals that require stimulation to be content. Maybe I'm not using the right words for you, but can't you understand the concept? It's called enrichment and it's practiced in zoo's world-wide to enhance captive animals' experiences.
-----
Diego

SWCHR

JKruse Dec 24, 2008 01:21 PM

Kinda like talking to one's house plant . . . LOL. Just kidding. I'm a big fan of enrichment, i engage in it all the time thus my gain of about 15 pounds this year. But I dunno if snakes can be enriched -- "options for stimulation" maybe? But man would it be cool if I could get one of 'em to roll over and then toss it a mouse. My wife might actually pay more attention to them...

And yet another technical thread -- and of all days, Christmas eve no less. Diego, Diego, Diego . . . LOL.
-----
Jerry Kruse

"Yesterday is history.....tomorrow is a mystery.........but today is a gift -- that is why it is called the present". - Master Oogway

viborero Dec 24, 2008 02:52 PM

...you don't expect me to go quietly into that good (silent) night, do you? Besides it's a fair question.

"whatever it takes for greater optimal care under captive conditions"

Gee, I wonder who said that?

Merry Christmas, and save me some leftovers!!
-----
Diego

SWCHR

JKruse Dec 25, 2008 06:39 PM

Well, not ENTIRELY disagreeing Diego. But you kinda summed it up when you stated...."all my snakes have different behaviors when presented with certain choices and situations. For lack of a better word, they all have different personalities, and do react to certain stimuli when it is presented."

I think it's about stimulation. As for senses, well, the basic needs for survival....YES. But two boas cuddling because they wanna are enamored with one another? NO. It's a basic needs drive -- potential sex/reproduction, just as with shelter/security, hunger, brumation (as species appropriate), etc. Alot of the enrichment programs are based up operant conditioning, as we all know of Pavlov's pooch. It is a simple a b=c situation for the animal, but not for us humans as we utilize it as a means, in the case for enrichment, to observe a tiger under unusual captive conditions for visual health examinations, OR, (uugghhhhh.....) for human entertainment (California sea lions "waving hello" to the little candy-sucking tykes with mother's who fork over the dollars to go "awwwwwww" -- obviously I have issues with this one, LOL...). So can snakes be "enriched"? Well, I don't entirely think so, BUT, in conjunction with Frank's discussions around providing stimulating environments (i.e. stacks for a serpent's own selection as to finding a heat gradiant that is suitable or the use of soil for varanids as opposed to other substrate media...) that are both psychologically healthy (and I don't mean emotionally, but to be able to better conduct their needs-driven behaviors under captive conditions in which these behaviors are simply a by-product of evolutionary development that we humans unfortunately take away from them -- even though we might be talking about captive bred specimens) and actually allow them to HAVE THAT CHOICE as evidenced by observing such behaviors that would likely NOT be seen simply being provided newspaper and one hide box and a single bulb. (See Frank, I've been listening..... )
-----
Jerry Kruse

"Yesterday is history.....tomorrow is a mystery.........but today is a gift -- that is why it is called the present". - Master Oogway

viborero Dec 26, 2008 07:06 AM

....just so we're on the same page, I don't mean training or conditioning. By enrichment I mean adding other elements to their enclosures to explore; maybe switching up their food items here and there; hiding the food item so that they have to actually track it down...you know - little breaks from the normal, everyday routine.

I'm not trying to postulate that snakes have human quality feelings (although everyone seems to think I am). I am not concerned with them "cuddling" or "missing" each other. I just want to know if it is beneficial for them to have different stimuli presented to them. Geez...
-----
Diego

SWCHR

JKruse Dec 26, 2008 07:56 AM

I see your point. So what we are engaging in is simply what's called "semantics", which is basically word play. You are using the term enrichment but really meaning something else. Might not be the absolute correct term, but I get what you mean now. I thought so, but wanted to be clear. So more of differential stimuli to do "whatever you can" to make it more meaningful for the animals "under captive conditions" -- just re-visiting what i'd said earlier........is that accurate?
-----
Jerry Kruse

"Yesterday is history.....tomorrow is a mystery.........but today is a gift -- that is why it is called the present". - Master Oogway

viborero Dec 26, 2008 08:18 AM

....we have a winner! You see what I mean now.

From Webster's:

Main Entry: en·rich
Pronunciation: in-ˈrich, en-
Function: transitive verb
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French enrichir, enricher, from en- + riche rich
Date: 14th century

: to make rich or richer esp. by the addition or increase of some desirable quality, attribute, or ingredient :

Semantics is a bit more about language, but that can work as well. As long as you see my point,I don't care what it's called!!

-----
Diego

SWCHR

JKruse Dec 26, 2008 08:50 AM

I would like to enrich my bank account actually . . . . LOL. Even have one of those 401K plans that match your investment dollar for dollar........but that is sadly not the case.

And to go and use Mr. Webster against me! It's an outrage....a downright scandal.........every right to have me hone my pitching skills for when i catch you in the dunk-tank seat....LOL....

It's all good. Glad we can see eye-to-eye as it does not always happen on this forum of passion and drama.
-----
Jerry Kruse

"Yesterday is history.....tomorrow is a mystery.........but today is a gift -- that is why it is called the present". - Master Oogway

viborero Dec 26, 2008 09:08 AM

...I was using Mr. Webster with you, not against you, Jerry. lol

Having time off from work is dangerous. Too much time to think...
-----
Diego

SWCHR

JKruse Dec 26, 2008 11:04 AM

I KNOW Diego -- I was using some levity around this intense conversation that we're all involved in. Nothing personal taken naturally -- no worries. Never too much time to think either.....it's what people need to do more of instead of impulsivity. LOL. We can start another thread on human behaviors now, LMAO....
-----
Jerry Kruse

"Yesterday is history.....tomorrow is a mystery.........but today is a gift -- that is why it is called the present". - Master Oogway

jeff schofield Dec 24, 2008 10:01 PM

I have yet to hear any stories about anyone's boa who is so happy to see its master it goes out to the curb to fetch the paper! The scientist in me insists on DATA to quantify this "enrichment". Can you please hypothesize a method to record and measure this enrichment? I want someone else to sound foolish for a change,lol.

viborero Dec 25, 2008 12:56 PM

..nice try, science guy! I don't have the knowledge or background to "hypothesize a method to record and measure this enrichment". If you wish to quantify this, the scientist in you should be screaming to figure out a way to do so! Instead, you're by fantasizing about a newspaper-fetching boa - and you want ME to sound foolish??

All I know, being the lowly hobbyist I am, is that all my snakes have different behaviors when presented with certain choices and situations. For lack of a better word, they all have different personalities, and do react to certain stimuli when it is presented. That's all the DATA you get from me.
-----
Diego

SWCHR

Dobry Dec 25, 2008 03:33 PM

I have had my male boa repeatedly break out of his side of the cage and into the females. I then just started keeping them together. THEY LOVE EACH OTHER SEE!

-----
"Relax, Don't Worry, Have a Homebrew!" Charlie Papazian

FR Dec 24, 2008 04:42 PM

Jeff, you are human, therefore everything you see, feel, do, is anthromorphic when you think of animals. And yes, I understand science hates anthropomorphism, but then they have not done all that well understanding animals. Hmmmmm putting radios in animals with the antenna sticking out, then following it around with said antenna and thinking that animal will be normal and carry on normally. And said animal would run from the human even if the radio was not there.

So yes, we can compare apples to some sort of fruit we do not understand. After all, its all we have.

Snakes do indeed suffer from boredom or something very similar. Of course its not like us having to play board games and such or watching a good movie, to not be bored. REALITY TV!

They suffer from lack of what is normal to them. Such things as View, most wild snakes indeed sit in a safe place and look out. Hmmmmmmmmmmm Secure with a view. Hey don't we like that too?

Or Feel. Different species pick a certain feel, in the areas they spend time. Type of soil, type of rock, type of crevice, etc. To the point of how smooth it is. ETC. They avoid most areas to be in a certain area.

Temps and moisture. This is a range and they pick from a wide range to suit their needs.

Of course you could call these requirements, but they are mostly not addressed. So to me, its not enrichment to add this stuff, its just meeting whats normal to them.

So is enrichment something the recognize by sight, feel and smell, and use to their benefit???????

On the social front, We often find several species of snakes in the same burrows(shelters) Heck, I have photografts of an adult gila, an adult diamondback and a baby desert tort, sharing the same hole. WHY? In that area, there are indeed millions of holes they could pick from, BUT THEY DON'T. They pick holes with company, WHY?

We find different species of montane rattlesnakes, coiled together. AS we do the same species, Hmmmmmmmmmmm WHY? Are you getting this?

The simplist answer is, they want to do these things, and need to do these things, hey same as us.

The real point is, science does not understand why these animals do this, SO SCIENCE DISMISSES these common events. Sir, that is anthropomorphic. You know, to dismiss what we do not understand as humans. Hahahahahahahahaha this is fun. Cheers

Bianca Dec 24, 2008 08:16 PM

This was very interesting reading.

I keep my snakes in 55 gallon tanks with lots of driftwood and hide areas. They are much more active ,eat more than when I kept them in bins with less wood,etc.

They just seem happier and would never keep a 3 to 4 foot king ever again in anything less than 55 gallon with climbing wood and boxes.

jeff schofield Dec 24, 2008 10:05 PM

My bet is they move the exact same amount now as then only YOU SEE them more because there is less wood. The simplest answer is usually the correct one...

jeff schofield Dec 24, 2008 10:20 PM

Snakes do indeed suffer from boredom or something very similar. Of course its not like us having to play board games and such or watching a good movie, to not be bored. REALITY TV!

FR-Give me quantitative proof.

They suffer from lack of what is normal to them. Such things as View, most wild snakes indeed sit in a safe place and look out. Hmmmmmmmmmmm Secure with a view. Hey don't we like that too?

FR-If this is true, CB animals SHOULD be as bored as WC correct? That safe place with a view, that sounds like a female snake thing. The male snake will be trying to get out 24/7, they have mates at the pub missing them!

Or Feel. Different species pick a certain feel, in the areas they spend time. Type of soil, type of rock, type of crevice, etc. To the point of how smooth it is. ETC. They avoid most areas to be in a certain area.

FR-FEEL as in EMOTIONAL not physical.

Temps and moisture. This is a range and they pick from a wide range to suit their needs.

Of course you could call these requirements, but they are mostly not addressed. So to me, its not enrichment to add this stuff, its just meeting whats normal to them.

FR-Please tell me what is "normal" to a CB snake!!!

So is enrichment something the recognize by sight, feel and smell, and use to their benefit???????

On the social front, We often find several species of snakes in the same burrows(shelters) Heck, I have photografts of an adult gila, an adult diamondback and a baby desert tort, sharing the same hole. WHY? In that area, there are indeed millions of holes they could pick from, BUT THEY DON'T. They pick holes with company, WHY?

FR-Quite obviously once a habitat meeting their requirements is found thats where they stay. To have an abundance of specimens or species simply means that its large enough to accomodate all.

We find different species of montane rattlesnakes, coiled together. AS we do the same species, Hmmmmmmmmmmm WHY? Are you getting this?

FR-there may be thermoregulatory benefits no doubt!

The simplist answer is, they want to do these things, and need to do these things, hey same as us.

FR-their "wants" are on a primative, survival level. You cant equate that with a human's "wants" on an intrinsic level.

The real point is, science does not understand why these animals do this, SO SCIENCE DISMISSES these common events. Sir, that is anthropomorphic. You know, to dismiss what we do not understand as humans. Hahahahahahahahaha this is fun. Cheers

FR-science does not dismiss these events, they are duly noted, but so are the air temp, the ground temp, humidity, security, proximity to water,prey,alternative cover etc. I am not dismissing all socialization, I dismiss anything comparing their socialization to anything without quantifiable data. FR, I got a new name for you.....SNAKE WHISPERER! Merry Christmas!

FR Dec 25, 2008 10:08 AM

Your perfect, you think animals are only parts that work, no brain, no thoughts, no learning, nothing more then parts. Your a biologist.

All I got to say is, good thing there are ethlogist, you know, those who specialist in behavior. Those that think in a little different way. Those that think animals actually BEHAVE.

I will take back the part about you being a biologist or scientists. Because if you were, you would have asked about the situations I stated. U know, about finding snakes in groups. If you did, I would have stated that the simple Pat answer you state, you know, thermoregulation bit, is huey. As those animals had the exact same choices ALL over the area they are in.

Instead, they attract to eachother for reasons OTHER THEN mechanical. A biologist would ask questions, not just state NAIVE come backs.

Anyone with a brain can tell snakes do have different personalities. They and inherent knowledge(instint) they have learning knowledge. And they do make decisions. They do make choices, both for biological reasons and behavioral reasons.

So while you think your responce was effective, it was not, its very naive. Try again. Try asking questions instead of popping off. hahahahahahahahaha Cheers

Fleck Dec 25, 2008 11:21 AM

Perhaps some do not want to hear what you have to say .

Its easier to justify keeping snakes in small cramped bins that way.

FR Dec 25, 2008 12:28 PM

I am sure that has a lot to do with it. But all in all, we put them in boxes anyway, so why not try to make the boxes better. Or NOT!

But to make it about the animals not having behavior just to rationalize our keeping them is very very sad.

Fleck Dec 25, 2008 12:41 PM

I agree .
We do keep them in boxes but lets make the box as big as possible with things to climb on,etc.

Not a box where they cant even stretch .That only contains a hide box and water bowl.
Thats the point your making many dont want to hear it.

http://gallery.pethobbyist.com/photo.php?id=356869

Jeff Schofield Dec 25, 2008 09:18 PM

Your perfect, you think animals are only parts that work, no brain, no thoughts, no learning, nothing more then parts. Your a biologist.

FR-I am a biologist. I am NOT a psychiatrist, psychologist, sociologist, or any other sympatric anthropomorphization you may suggest. Animals are life forms that have a place in their niche but the moment the niche is removed so are the applicable NEEDS of the animal. Everything changes.

All I got to say is, good thing there are ethlogist, you know, those who specialist in behavior. Those that think in a little different way. Those that think animals actually BEHAVE.

FR-does a "ethlogist" really specialize in behavior? How much do they make? Know anyone looking for a job in the field? Does this count as a question to you? LMAO

I will take back the part about you being a biologist or scientists. Because if you were, you would have asked about the situations I stated. U know, about finding snakes in groups. If you did, I would have stated that the simple Pat answer you state, you know, thermoregulation bit, is huey. As those animals had the exact same choices ALL over the area they are in.

FR-to ask questions of you is like letting bad gas out of a balloon. Its interesting and flammable but it smells bad.

Instead, they attract to eachother for reasons OTHER THEN mechanical. A biologist would ask questions, not just state NAIVE come backs.

FR-NAIVE comebacks? I asked for PROOF....You never attempted to answer my questions either.

Anyone with a brain can tell snakes do have different personalities. They and inherent knowledge(instint) they have learning knowledge. And they do make decisions. They do make choices, both for biological reasons and behavioral reasons.

FR-I never said snakes weren't different nor did I have to keep them in a box. I am suggesting you are drawing CONCLUSIONS from non existing data. That is not very scientific(tongue in cheek)is it??

So while you think your responce was effective, it was not, its very naive. Try again. Try asking questions instead of popping off. hahahahahahahahaha Cheers

FR-Popping off, serve and volley. I attempted to answer each of your attacks and made fun of the obvious rhetoric. Your anecdotes serve no purpose because they neither answer a question nor disprove a theory. Stories are fun to listen to, we all got em, and you got some doozies for sure. But I never mistake it for fact. Facts are proved, and can be repeated hence are the basis for science. To draw conclusions from anecdotes is simply wrong. So haha me all you want, this is fun, but I say a "bored" CB snake staring at a TV is thinking as much about Peanut Butter as it is about the life outside its cage....because it cant process the idea of what it is to be outside the cage. It can try to get out, not the same thing at all.

HDEAN Dec 25, 2008 08:42 AM

Frank, its hopeless. Most people don't get that we humans put our human spin on everything. We have the ability to reason so therefore we think we can find a reason or answer to everything, we can't. We try but we really don't know if we're 100% right, 100% wrong or somewhere in between. It kind of like the breeder/keeper that says they keep their animals in a naturalistic cage. Sure to their view of naturalistic it may be but its not really. No natural smells, views, rainfall, wind, extremes of heat and cold, preditors, and hundreds of other stimulates of nature we couldn't possibly understand. Are they needed to keep and reproduce the animals in captivity, obviously not, since we can do it without these. Does it mean we have bored snakes, who knows?

FR Dec 25, 2008 10:46 AM

That one is easy to test.

Of course, snakes are not humans, so lets change the meaning of bored, JUST A LITTLE.

We will use lack of behavior as being bored. Lack of behavior can be associated with a lack of stimuli. As we know, life can be difined as the ability to respond to a stimulis. As life complicates(evolves), it becomes the ability to respond to a multitude of stimuli.

In this case, a snake sitting in a box with little stimulus can be interpitated as being bored. After all, it may only eat, crap, grow. Which is not much of a life, not even for humans.

So for a snake to sit in a box and not have nothing to respond to is both, boring and being bored.

If you compare that to a wild snake that is exposed to many many stimuli, and is actively responding to them. A snake in a box can very well be thought of as bored.

What we see is, reptiles recognize things, materials, sights, and other animals. They interact in their world, They attract and repell to sights, conditions and other animals. Including members of their own species. So to them its not boring, they are active in a full set of stimuli.

To the extreme, a shoe box does not do anything to compensate for that. There is nothing they can recognize or respond to. So yes, a snake doing nothing is bored. Again we stretch the word bored to fit snakes. Which I believe is the proper use of the english language.

To the point, a snake without normal stimuli, can be called bored compared to a snake thats life is nothing but reacting to mulitude and varied stimuli.

To compare to humans, compare the life of a prisoner in solitary confinement(shoe box) to any free ranging human. Primitive or otherwise. So is a prisoner in solitary confinement, bored compared to a person thats free to make decisions and experience varied stimuli???????? I would say yes, but then who knows, they can live like that!

Oh by the way Henry, merry christmas and this post was not aimed at you, but to the others who need stimuli. Cheers

Jeff Schofield Dec 25, 2008 09:39 PM

Hey Frank, compared to a marathon runner you and I may be considered bored staring at a small box, moving only our fingers. While you may not find stimuli I just might, and I would use the stimuli that I had and would be hypersensetive(blind having better hearing,etc) to it. If you wanted to test your latest theory all you would have to do is compare both WC and CB to the same set behaviors....feeding,mating, male/male "combat",etc. If WC animals were more aggressive/out-competing the CB competition what would this say? You could say a wc animal was ready for the stimuli......but I could also suggest that the CB was not "hypersensetive" as you would also suggest. Boredom and sensetivity are HUMAN traits, and its my contention that there would be NO STATISTICAL DIFFERENCE between the 2.
Back to the marathon runner and the computer guy. Both have their place and I accept both of them. It doesnt matter what anyone says about either of them to make me feel differently.

FR Dec 26, 2008 10:37 AM

Do you actually read what you write? Your only making silly rationalizations. Try looking at the animals, then say something.

Your so missing the point and its obvious why, you do not want to hear it.

In nature, snakes make millions of decisions, in fact, that is all they do. Pick this, avoid that. Follow this scent trail, make that scent trail. Etc.

They are constantly learning, First to find good shelter, a shelter that protects them from what is harmful, heat, cold, wet, dry, desease, predators, etc. Then they find many of those, that are more suited for different reasons. Like, this one is better in winter, this one better in summer, this one better when its wet and this one when its cold. Where prey is and when, and where to hunt when that runs out. etc etc.

In captivity, they get to sit and wait until the lid opens and a mouse flys in, or they are grabbed and put into a feeding box. I know, anthropomorphic, but this by comparison is boring.

So in simple terms, and I guess you need simple, They experience thousands of stimuli in nature compared to very few in captivity. So why not give them more and sit back and enjoy learning what they really are??? No one is saying ALL, just more or as much as we can??????

Of course there are BETTER questions, such as, do they seek stimuli or do they avoid it. Hmmmmmmmmm The answer is yes, they seek some and avoid others. Hmmmmmmmmmm something to do and not be bored. hahahahahahahahahahaha

As a field herper, I/we learn the different sets of stimuli they seek and try to figure out why they seek them. First we learn where these needs cross our path. That way, we can learn to repeatedly find the snakes. Then we try to learn what these mean and why they do them. Of course many are done for physical needs, but many are not. ITs here we have to question our understanding. At least YOU DO. hahahahahahahahaha

One silly thought for you. We all know snakes practice "ritualized combat" we have known that for decades. Yet we do not ask what that means.

The first word, ritual, means its done over and over. Its done with many many species and done in different ways depending on the species. (ritual Formal, scripted, etc.)Then the word combat. Of course that is means to fight, indicating to kill. But when we put those two words together, it means to fight without killing. But then its not a fight is it?

So I ask you, why would snakes practive this? why would they want to fight/dance with another of their own type and not kill? Why would they practice the same dance moves and do so with each individual?

Normally this practice is limited to highly social animals. Animals and humans that live in complex groups or tribes. In order to develop something so complex and so repeated, you know, from generation to generation, this Combat(dance) has to be repeated in each and every generation and individual.

I know common sense does not play a part on these forums, but its only common sense that an animal that practices ritualized movements, is not a simple behavioral animal. What say you sir?

JKruse Dec 26, 2008 11:31 AM

Just in response to this interesting piece.....

"Normally this practice is limited to highly social animals. Animals and humans that live in complex groups or tribes. In order to develop something so complex and so repeated, you know, from generation to generation, this Combat(dance) has to be repeated in each and every generation and individual.

I know common sense does not play a part on these forums, but its only common sense that an animal that practices ritualized movements, is not a simple behavioral animal. What say you sir?"

In using the word "ritualized", that is also a personification by man to aid in human understanding -- not wanting to get into a semantics debate at all, but humans engage in rituals for a number of reasons, but for basics such as by DECISION for unification, for group significance, for pride, for tradition, as well as for sentimental purpose of that group for remembrance into the future generations (a gajillion examples such use of a decorated tree during a specific time of year in Catholicism (another sub-group if you will) or the serpentine-like dance that is believed to promote fertility amongst a certain tribal group in Transvaal Africa amongst the females in that group. There is emotion and a belief system, again a more advanced brain function, largely based in that ritualism....

For animals, again, it must be largely instinctual and repeated as such for the betterment of the individual, or the group/herd/pack, as well as the promotion of survival that has developed over eons and eons. Rattlesnake combat, for example, is not a decision based upon the victor getting to select a choice female, or prize, or title afterwards......MUCH unlike a boxer after winning a title fight, LOL. That combat is subsequent to the development of sexual hormones triggered subsequent to a brumation period. The chemical component is a huge factor here in the ability for individuals to be able to determine who is male versus female and even likely the ability to determine who is the victor at the end of combat......I don't see the loser running off a crying and swiggin a beer in defeat or the victor being hoisted up by the other snakes in celebration of victory, but rather a complex (and largely not-yet-completely-understood) ability to determine who has won and then move on to either battle again or have the ability to mate/reproduce.

So not a ritualistic decision to decidedly engage in, but rather an instinctual ability that (I believe in many ways far superior to the emotionally-laden, paternity payment-resulting fallible and bar-fighting relationships we humans ridiculously engage in time and time again...) is genetically pre-determined and innate.

So if not a ritual, what would be the more appropriate term if we remove the need for human palatability for a description?

A tittillating discussion nonetheless.....LOL.......
-----
Jerry Kruse

"Yesterday is history.....tomorrow is a mystery.........but today is a gift -- that is why it is called the present". - Master Oogway

FR Dec 26, 2008 01:37 PM

With ritualize combat, in most cases, its between same sized males. Not uneven sized males. This indicates a choice of whom to dance with.

While testing this, smaller individuals are often simply chased around. Not "ritualized combat". So again it indicates MORE.

I have seen this in nature as well, larger males simply chasing smaller males. But choosing to combat other larger males.

This combat occurs at all times of the year, not post brumation. To that point, this occurs in tropical species that do not brumate. Hmmmmmmmmm brumation is only for the extremes not the normal. Most snakes and snake species are tropical. So to base what snakes do from the extremes is not a good choice.

Even in our north american cases, combating occurs fall, spring, and mid summer. Hmmmmmmmmmmm

It also occurs with female to male and female to female.

I have also seen it occur with different species. Hmmmmmmmmmmm At least they were closely related, so what do they know.

I have also seen it and photographed it with groups of both sexes. Hmmmmmmm its party time.

Again, I have seen it occur both in captivity, thousands of times, and in nature, not nearly so common. In fact, we find adult males together very often and no sign of combating. to practice ritualized combat seems to be rare.

In my observations, it occurs with like sized animals over possessions. Like, a female, a hole, a prey item, a basking spot, etc.

Cheers

JKruse Dec 26, 2008 02:45 PM

When I meant brumation I had in my mind the rattlesnake example, but YES, not all animals go through a "brumation".

BUT, there is some naturally-occurring phenomena that signals a change in environment and then stimulates for production of viable eggs/sperm and subsequent related behaviors. And although not a drastic environmental change entirely, but a periodic change in temperature or change in photoperiod that provides that biological prompting.

Otherwise all else makes sense, but the essence of that ability to sense without rational/emotive ability remains the crux of the discussion, therefore not "feeling" angry or lonely, but rather an innate drive to behave in such manners that give way to the fittest being the most likely to succeed and survive.

Yes? No? Just clarifying . . .
-----
Jerry Kruse

"Yesterday is history.....tomorrow is a mystery.........but today is a gift -- that is why it is called the present". - Master Oogway

FR Dec 26, 2008 10:58 PM

not true sir. have you visited other parts of the world. In many parts, snakes produce in all times of the year. Even in one area. Sometimes one species.

Some produce in the dry and some in the wet, and some in both. The key is support, which is the same in captivity, All reptiles require support to reproduce. To understand what supports them is what is important. Winter is a hinderence, not a support. It prevents them from reproducing, it does not support it.

In most parts of the world, what is important is what supports reproduction, not what prevents it. Cheers

Tony D Dec 26, 2008 02:30 PM

All the Frankisms aside, that was a pretty good post. Perhaps "bored" is the wrong word but our animals by and large are at least understimulated.
-----
That is a a completely narcistocanibolizistic thing to say!

JKruse Dec 26, 2008 02:50 PM

I still can't adjust to all the hmmm's and haha's, but otherwise, i agree. Good conversation, and one that can go on for quite some time. It all makes alot of sense, but it's the lengthy observations that are required which many of us just don't have that kind of time. That's why I decided to start listening and trying to read between the humming and laughing (my triggers I guess) to what the essence of the message was. It's coming together now, and I appreciate it.
-----
Jerry Kruse

"Yesterday is history.....tomorrow is a mystery.........but today is a gift -- that is why it is called the present". - Master Oogway

Tony D Dec 30, 2008 10:05 AM

This has been a meandering conversation to say the least. That I agree with what Frank is saying now has no bearing on the fact that I think his "happy snake family" theory is way out in left field.
-----
That is a a completely narcistocanibolizistic thing to say!

FR Dec 26, 2008 11:09 PM

heres the thing, about frankisms, I am frank, so I must express frankisms. They should not be aside. What you want me to express Tonyisms?

As the animals express what is personal to them, so must I and so must you. Cheers

Tony D Dec 27, 2008 11:51 AM

"heres the thing, about frankisms" they detract from what you're trying to say. This isn't fact to face communication its written and more difficult. If you're told your written method is being recieved well perhaps you should try to adjust it. I have.
-----
That is a a completely narcistocanibolizistic thing to say!

Jeff Schofield Dec 26, 2008 11:29 PM

Do you actually read what you write? Your only making silly rationalizations. Try looking at the animals, then say something.

FR- I did, they didnt say anything back. What did they say to you??

Your so missing the point and its obvious why, you do not want to hear it.

FR-MY POINT was to "stop anthropomorphizing", thats all I have said. Why cant you see that?

In nature, snakes make millions of decisions, in fact, that is all they do. Pick this, avoid that. Follow this scent trail, make that scent trail. Etc.

FR-so you are saying they DONT do that in captivity??

They are constantly learning, First to find good shelter, a shelter that protects them from what is harmful, heat, cold, wet, dry, desease, predators, etc. Then they find many of those, that are more suited for different reasons. Like, this one is better in winter, this one better in summer, this one better when its wet and this one when its cold. Where prey is and when, and where to hunt when that runs out. etc etc.

FR-Are they constantly learning or do they know their home range like the back of their....tail? Do they travel throughout their lives or do they have a specific home range? If they are constantly learning do you think they know every rock and tunnel? If you think they are running their own mouse farm I want to assure you....they arent.

In captivity, they get to sit and wait until the lid opens and a mouse flys in, or they are grabbed and put into a feeding box. I know, anthropomorphic, but this by comparison is boring.

FR- you assume AND anthropomorphize here.....

So in simple terms, and I guess you need simple, They experience thousands of stimuli in nature compared to very few in captivity. So why not give them more and sit back and enjoy learning what they really are??? No one is saying ALL, just more or as much as we can??????

FR-well if you can prove it by all means go ahead and try. I am not doubting the stimuli, but if you claim they can LEARN then the stimuli they DO recieve should be more sensetive...correct?

Of course there are BETTER questions, such as, do they seek stimuli or do they avoid it. Hmmmmmmmmm The answer is yes, they seek some and avoid others. Hmmmmmmmmmm something to do and not be bored. hahahahahahahahahahaha

FR-I have never seen a snake DO "something" to keep from being bored. I suggest you havent either....they dont do well on stairmasters either.

As a field herper, I/we learn the different sets of stimuli they seek and try to figure out why they seek them. First we learn where these needs cross our path. That way, we can learn to repeatedly find the snakes. Then we try to learn what these mean and why they do them. Of course many are done for physical needs, but many are not. ITs here we have to question our understanding. At least YOU DO. hahahahahahahahaha

FR-I question EVERYTHING, as a good scientist does. I question YOU,lol, as you do have nuggets beneath tons of dirt. FINDING snakes takes no more than learning to interpret weather patterns,period. 1 1=2 every time. We DONT know everything though. Our problem mostly comes from thinking in 2 dimenisions instead of the 3 that snakes use...or the 4th reserved for snake whisperers,lmao.

One silly thought for you. We all know snakes practice "ritualized combat" we have known that for decades. Yet we do not ask what that means.

FR-I think "ritualized combat" is an over simplified term for sure. I think its a blanket statement that covers alot of different behavior that people "lightly" studying snakes came up with.

The first word, ritual, means its done over and over. Its done with many many species and done in different ways depending on the species. (ritual Formal, scripted, etc.)Then the word combat. Of course that is means to fight, indicating to kill. But when we put those two words together, it means to fight without killing. But then its not a fight is it?

FR-combat doesnt equal fight which doesnt equate to kill.

So I ask you, why would snakes practive this? why would they want to fight/dance with another of their own type and not kill? Why would they practice the same dance moves and do so with each individual?

FR-the first and most obvious would be because FEMALES prefer Rico Suave dancers. Killing their own species is not beneficial to the perpetuity of the species. Cannibalization is a major step in evolution, its something that should be studied ALOT more. Sandtiger sharks and other species practice this IN UTERO,fascinating!

Normally this practice is limited to highly social animals. Animals and humans that live in complex groups or tribes. In order to develop something so complex and so repeated, you know, from generation to generation, this Combat(dance) has to be repeated in each and every generation and individual.

FR-communities often require order, and these "rituals" establish dominance and roles. Their is undoubtably pheremones involved, and until we can detect and catagorize them their "behavior" will be misinterpreted.

I know common sense does not play a part on these forums, but its only common sense that an animal that practices ritualized movements, is not a simple behavioral animal. What say you sir?

FR-again I suggest that "ritualized" is the wrong word. Common sense says there is a simpler explanation (the interpretation of chemical signals through pheremones)than one hoping for "intelligent" life. And when I read about the paper-chasing boa I will expect to find a man-made pheremone trail as well.

FR Dec 27, 2008 09:35 AM

Everything you say, everything that is written, IS ANTHROPOMORPHISM, as its all thought and written by humans.

We have no other way to think about animals. We ARE HUMAN.

For you to pick and choose what you can anthropomorphize is very prejudiced. With that, your simply making it up, you know, setting your own rules to benefit only you.

I can use this word, but not that one, etc. Hmmmmmmm science can use math to predict reptile behavior, instead of using math to help us understand reptile behavior. Where has science gone?

Also that you do not understand what a captive animal demands of you, is really based on you and not the animal. As they are always trying to tell us what they want and need. All you have to do is listen(watch). Most reptiles give their lives trying to tell us we are doing something wrong. I imagine you simply say, what a stupid snake and throw it away and get another.

Of course if you put a snake in a shoe box with no way to express its needs, its not going to tell you much. But if you give it many options and watch what it picks and what it chooses and when and how, then someday you may figure out the why.

Then if you were really smart, you could use wild populations to see if that choice and the reasons FIT THEM. or not. Of course, you can do that with wild populations first then test it with captives. To test is key and to test must recieve results, not just data.

The problem is, you have to allow the captive snakes to make choices and then measure their progress. Progress can be measured in growth, quality and quanity of reproduction. Quality and quanity of expressed behaviors. You can measure sequence of expressed behaviors. You understand that don't you???? Oh I get it, you think they do not have any, that way, your doing great! So your snake ate a mouse and crapped, hmmmmm thats living isn't it!

I am sure you understand numbers. Thats why your a mechanic and not an ethlogist. You do understand when you talk about what animals do and why they do them, your talking about ethlogy. Of course theres the old cart before the horse, behavior controls biology or visa versa. That is a great discussion.

The problem is, you have no idea what reptiles do, because you have no words to discribe them. The truth is, behaviors are not words. Words will never totally discribe them. They can only try. So yes, words like bored or whatever are not exact fits, in fact, there not even close. But they are all we have!

Person, ones self, Personality, qualities unique to that self. It can and is used for other things then humans. The personality of a race car, a horse, what is unique to that individual thing.

yes, by design of nature, all animals have qualities unique to them. That insures evolution.

We know animals have individual physical abilities, which makes one more suited then another in their current set of conditions. The same goes for behavorial qualities. This is called personality. Whether its human or not.

Some snakes learn to tolerate humans very quickly, others do not. That is related to personality. Some can adjust to captivity faster and better then others, that too is about personality. Some behave in a way we call cute, others do not, that is personality.

You can say, so and so has a personality. But all humans have personality, not all humans have nice ones or cute ones, etc. Same goes for animals.

Some species are more personable then others. Which means we like the way they act towards us. In that, some personable species have more personable individuals. This discribes how that individual animals relates to us. And yes, reptiles do this. And yes, its anthropomorphic. As are all things we think, when we use them with anything non-human. How about human qualities directed at a car. Hmmmmmmmmm commonplace. Cheers

JKruse Dec 26, 2008 08:44 AM

So here is an example that is appropriate considering the conversation (dare i say borderline inappropriateness between us grown men...). I have kept a small colony of fence lizards (Sceloporus -- for zonata usage as needed) that are w/c, and never kept them with any UV light or much less anything else in their 2.5 gallon tank. The colony consisted of nine adults (3 males and 6 females). Coincidentally, prior to this thread about 8 weeks ago but subsequent to listening to the discussions about stimuli and creating a varied environment even under such restricted captive conditions, I decided to take 1.3 of these lizards and transfer them into a 10-gallon tank with a host of rocks, branches, a small-scale pile of debris that replicates to some degree the junk/wood pile that I found them near, and a UVB light that is on a timer from 10am to 3pm daily.

Prior to the change of providing a larger tank, climbing/hiding objects, and the UVB, I still fed them a combination of different worms (wax, butter) as well as small sized crickets) every other day occasionally dusted with calcium and vit D3, and misted their cage every other day as well. Prior to the changes, I kept them like this for years and they would go several months but never make it to the spring (they are captured between summer and fall). I already had two die so far as it is only December.

The experimental group (Schofield is gonna love my terminology here....) consisting of the 1.3 lizards are currently under this change, and are SO much more active and displaying some behavior that I'd not seen in prior years (head bobbing in the male) and eating somewhat better.

-- A reminder that I was only keeping these critters to use for scenting, so their overall value was not that great as they could be placed into the deep freeze for such purposes if they passed on. But I have found over the last couple years that live scenting works better for some of my snakes as, I would presume, the scent is stronger and fresher. AND, I actually LIKE having them around as they are behaviorally neat and I've considered breeding them in order to have more herping time in the field as opposed to concentrating on capturing these precious scenting items. --

The control group () of the remaining subjects are looking the same as always......not as active and not as hungry, and certainly demonstrating no alternative behaviors, and to bring things current, one of the control group females passed away just yesterday. The experimental group seems to be going strong and have better colors than their control group counterparts. SOOOO, there IS something to be said for provision of stimulation and behavioral options for these critters.....as although they can not "feel" emotions and get depressed, they CAN be understimulated and become lethargic and potentially have a shorter life span.

Consider this (I'm starting to SOUND like Frank.....LOL.....) -- I have a dear friend who keeps herps and lives in NJ. He provides his snakes with cypress mulch, very appropriate hiding spaces that require the snakes to work to get under or into such spaces, the opportunity to thermoregulate, a photoperiod of natural light, as well as brumation during the winter even though he does not breed his snakes. I kid you not that most of his snakes (both w/c and c/b) are extremely long-lived -- he has a w/c annulata that was purchased as a baby in the early-1980's that is still extremely healthy and outwardly vibrant as well as a w/c eastern king that was captured as an adult in the mid-1990's and is still going strong, as well as other colubrids and several pythons that have exceeded 25 years in captivity. I see his collection several times per year and I am always impressed to see how good they look. Is the "secret" that he provides more than just the basic paper towels, a water dish, and a simple hide spot? It MUST be, as I know other breeders who provide the basics, and I might add very appropriate basics along with a good feeding regimen and solid cage-cleaning schedule, that lose their breeders after only a dozen or so years. VERY interesting, and all this has prompted me to do this small-scale experiment with these fence lizards to see which group fares better. I think the writing is on the wall, but will be some form of DATA going forward.
-----
Jerry Kruse

"Yesterday is history.....tomorrow is a mystery.........but today is a gift -- that is why it is called the present". - Master Oogway

snake_bit Dec 24, 2008 03:08 PM

"Is human interaction enough for our snakes?"
I sometimes keep the TV on in the snake room but they fight over what channel to watch.Cornsnakes like the comedy network and the kings like to watch history.My milk snakes like to watch the evening news but not Fox News.Bill O'Reilly scares them and they dont eat for weeks.
I have one nebraska snake that like opera but mostly we listen to 60's and 70's rock n roll

Merry Christmas

.
-----
"You look like a guy caught smugling reptiles in his pants" John McCain to David Letterman
Doug L

antelope Dec 24, 2008 07:09 PM

LMAO! I just choked on a turkey leg on that one! Too funny! I think they benefit from things they can check out from the safety of their hides, then explore when they want to. Experience is a good thing!
-----
Todd Hughes

jeff schofield Dec 24, 2008 10:22 PM

Geez, I thought those western variants would have surely like BOTH kinds of music....Country AND Western!

viborero Dec 25, 2008 01:03 PM

...play a little early Metallica, Ride the Lightning, perhaps. Some of the girl snakes like Bon Jovi, but that's a totally different psychological defect and a new thread, I think.
-----
Diego

SWCHR

JKruse Dec 26, 2008 08:59 AM

as it is most correctly spelled before the Jersey native changed it for better marketability, is actually a cool guy. This is ridiculous, but my daughter (who is aspiring to be a semi-pro figure skater) attends the same skating school here in Manhattan, NYC, that his daughter also attends. As well as David Bowie's and Iman's daughter that skates with my daughter, lol, and the sons of Kevin Bacon, Spike Lee, Kelly Ripa, to name a few, that play hockey there as well. Why am I saying all this? Dunno -- just bored on a vaction day post-Christmas and thought it's be cool to share the experience of living in NYC. Never know who you're gonna bump into under the right set of conditions and timing -- whew! Talk about stimulation.......
-----
Jerry Kruse

"Yesterday is history.....tomorrow is a mystery.........but today is a gift -- that is why it is called the present". - Master Oogway

JKruse Dec 26, 2008 08:01 AM

is actually a nearby neighbor of mine and his daughter is my daughter's classmate -- seriously. He's actually a prety nice guy off camera and his wife is a hottie half his age. But yeah, when on-camera my critters tend to hide away when he's on. Weird.....
-----
Jerry Kruse

"Yesterday is history.....tomorrow is a mystery.........but today is a gift -- that is why it is called the present". - Master Oogway

monklet Dec 25, 2008 10:08 AM

In natural circumstances pleasure is generally what compells us to do the things which permit survival e.g., eating, sex, exploration, defecation, scratching, grooming etc. Although there is no way to prove it, it would be silly to suppose that OTHER animals lack such pleasureable responses.

In conducting science anthropomorphism needs to be avoided only because we have no means of ultimately quantifying and qualifying the thought processes, sensations and emotions of other creatures...and this problem exists even in the study of our own kind. I have no way of proving that anyone else experiences what I know as pleasure, sadness, joy etc. To presume such for another would be monkletomorphizing!

As for my snakes, some are "fossorial duds" which apparently prefer to stay in the dark and show little if any curiosity. Others are constantly exploring, curious and to some degree respond to my presence. I treat them accordingly and strongly believe in "enrichment" for those animals which respond to it.

Thanks Diego for the thoughtful post!

btw, that image of Sophia is simply awesome! ...and what a looker she is! Best herp photo of the year!

Brad

viborero Dec 25, 2008 01:16 PM

I like it!

Yes, I guess it's hard to convince me that there's not something there simply because it can't be weighed, measured, or detected with MRI.

Take this for example. I have a pair of Green Ratsnakes. They are housed separately, yet identically. The male is a sullen SOB that just stays in his hides and strikes at anything that comes towards him. The female, on the other hand, is always in different areas around her enclosure, usually perching, and WATCHING the movements outside her enclosure. She observes ME more than I observe her. She is not nervous or aggressive, just passive and calm. How do you describe that?

BTW, glad you liked the pic. It's not a herp pic, but a future herper pic!
-----
Diego

SWCHR

FR Dec 25, 2008 07:13 PM

Hi, I have a trio of green rats that get along fine together and have no problems. Cheers

viborero Dec 25, 2008 07:22 PM

I'm sure mine would get along great. I don't house them together because I don't want them to breed this year. Otherwise I have many ratsnakes that live together and thrive.

My question is why do they act differently if they aren't supposed to have personalities, like Jeff said?
-----
Diego

SWCHR

Jeff Schofield Dec 25, 2008 10:23 PM

Snakes dont have PERSONalities....I never said they didnt have SNAKERalities....There are obvious differences for sure, but any attempt to compare them with PEOPLE's is simply wrong. And no 2 animals are EVER given the EXACT stimuli, there will always be other(possible over-riding)issues. Presenting a food item to 2 snakes doesnt account for other scent, biological conditions(days into shed cycles, etc),genetic conditions, as well as other yet unknown social conditions are all POSSIBLE. What you may see as "personality" could be a programmed response to set stimuli.

viborero Dec 26, 2008 06:56 AM

...I say you're just nit-picking now. Webster's defines "personality" as "a set of distinctive traits and characteristics", among several other definitions that do indeed pertain only to humans. However, it's the same concept, with a different application. Give it all the cute names you want - it boils down to the same thing: behavioral traits and idiosyncrasies that characterize an individual.

What name do you have for snakes being bored, so I can ask the question without insulting your sensibilities?
-----
Diego

SWCHR

JKruse Dec 26, 2008 09:06 AM

"without insulting your sensibilities"

I think you meant sensitivities . . . LOL. It all sounded great until I hit that word. Dang!

You guys are too much already. I think we get the message guys, but we are getting wayyy too caught up in semantics (shush) and the personification of these animals. I have always had a problem when people look at that waving sea lion at an aquarium and I hear someone say "what a neat personality they have!!! Awwwww.......". Needless to say -- I cringe at this. I wholeheartedly understand what they are trying to say, but it is a bit out of context. So what IS the correct terminology then? Animalities? Arthropodalities? Serpentalities?
-----
Jerry Kruse

"Yesterday is history.....tomorrow is a mystery.........but today is a gift -- that is why it is called the present". - Master Oogway

viborero Dec 26, 2008 09:12 AM

...don't make me bust out Webster's again! lol

What is it with you and that sea lion anyway? You seem have some deep-rooted trauma over that thing.
-----
Diego

SWCHR

JKruse Dec 26, 2008 11:32 AM

.
-----
Jerry Kruse

"Yesterday is history.....tomorrow is a mystery.........but today is a gift -- that is why it is called the present". - Master Oogway

FR Dec 26, 2008 11:25 AM

or things.

All those words are to discribe something REAL. The word itself is not real, but a grouping of letters. That grouping of letters is suppose to convey a meaning or something close. Of course its only letters so it cannot ever convey a complete meaning.

Things other then pure math, do not have a begining or end, and things like behavior are constantly changing. So when a word is applied it only covers a section, or part of a meaning, not the whole.

Different languages do this to various degrees. The english language is very poor at this, but makes up by constantly changing to fit the current situation. Some languages have many many words for one subject. As viewed by the english speaking peoples, but to those people who use them, there are many many descriptions/meanings of the same thing. As in, they are more sensitive to slight variances of the same subject.

While I am not keen on language, its not all that important to me.(as you can tell) I am keen on the actual subject. So the words are very much in the background when compared to the subject.

So yes, the continuing conversation could be very important.

JKruse Dec 26, 2008 11:36 AM

Not confused (you keep using that word frank...grrrr....) but ther seems to be some dystonic feel to not only the ideas/values being expressed, but alse the use of language to describe the aforementioned. Diego and i are just messing around.....as you can probably tell by our language, LOL, but I can not be responsible for his behaviors behind that computer screen of his. Hah! Carry on my good man........
-----
Jerry Kruse

"Yesterday is history.....tomorrow is a mystery.........but today is a gift -- that is why it is called the present". - Master Oogway

Tony D Dec 31, 2008 07:27 AM

"While I am not keen on language, its not all that important to me.(as you can tell) I am keen on the actual subject. So the words are very much in the background when compared to the subject."

That may explain why you often have difficulty communicating your ideas. You cannot expect agreement with or outright respect of your ideas if you don't properly articulate them.

BTW this is not a personal gab. I for one would love to see your thoughts more clearly presented.
-----
That is a a completely narcistocanibolizistic thing to say!

monklet Dec 26, 2008 09:52 AM

"What you may see as "personality" could be a programmed response to set stimuli."

Exactly, just like human personalities...we all just have slightly different config files and environmental circumstances which mask the underlying genetically coded behavioral predispositions and give the illusion of free will.

Remember that humans share a common ancestor with snakes and so the re will naturally be commonalities at some level. Granted the human cognitive processes are apparently more highly sophisticated (at least mine are and being an innately social species we have emotions which I doubt are shared by reptiles, or even most mammals for that matter.

Site Tools