Hamsters do not have genetic defects from years of inbreeding.
Never heard of eyeless white? Breed two roans and you get an eyeless white hamster. If memory serves it also lacks teeth!
The comparison of hamster to ball python is not a fair one. We are really just getting started with ball pythons but hamsters have 50 years of history. Back in the early days there were plenty of genetic problems. They were sorted out thru careful breeding and culling of the mutants and the heterozygote parents. Sadly, a $5000 snake is very hard to cull. BUT, it simply must be done. At the very least one must be willing to isolate the mutant and/or heterozygote specimen reproductively from the population.
The fact is 50 years and many generations of breeding and brutal culling is exactly the reason there are few problems remiaing in the population.
The hamster made it over the hump, with enough un-affected (or un-effected I forget which) animals identified to keep the species going. The question is do the caramel's in the USA have this? They can certainly break your heart.
I'd like to also add to the "nutritional genetic mutation" idea brought up earlier. This is something few have considered for herps until now. What if he is right and all that is needed is a thiamine supplement or some similar, maybe an amino acid to make up for the genetic defect.
If someone discovered you could keep caramels from kinking by feeding cream cheese to the rats before feeding the mother snake, would this be OK? Would we still want to continue the breed? Would an unscrupulous breeder hide this trade secret and be the only breeder with un-kinked animals? Thus, keeping this market for himself.
Would spiderballs be OK if ACTH stopped the twitches?
Just an idea. Food for thought. I love bumblebees!
I offer no solutions or answers. Just questions. Sorry. With the right questions we maybe-can solve the problems. Happy New year!
-----
In 2003 Los Angeles Magazine named us "Best Reptile Store" in Los Angeles. CHECK OUT THE DETAILS HERE