Been thinking about this choice thing for quite a bit. Not because I think its complete bunk but because there are some elements to it that I actually really like. As with any idea there are several dimensions by which to measure it but I'm going to work with only 2. On the first axis I'm going to put validity; or, in other words, are the observations of temp ranges utilized by wild snakes instructive for keeping captive specimens? On the other axis I'll put practicality, which relates to ones ability to achieve the temperature range. In the end it breaks down like this:
(Valid/Practical) (Invalid/Practical)
(Valid/Impractical) (Invalid/Impractical)
By organizing your information in such a way you see where to first focus your efforts. You certainly don't want to waste time applying an Invalid element of the observation that is also difficult or impractical to apply.
As an example of this, look at the low (60-ish) end of the suggested temperature range. While it is completely true that wild snakes will seek out and choose such cool temps during the summer they are STIMULATED to do so in response to drought and lack of available prey. SUCH STIMULATIONS SHOULD NOT EXIST IN CAPTIVE CONDITIONS! Provide adequate hydration (and a water bowl is a fine way to do this) and there is no need to go into moisture conservation mode. Provide an adequate diet and there is no need to go into energy conservation mode. Looking at practicality side of things, providing such an extreme air-conditioned background room temperature is impractical for most keepers. Doing so is energy intensive and expensive. From this analysis I get that the observed lows available to and utilized by wild snakes has no validity for maintaining captive specimens and is impractical for all but the most indulgent keepers. IMHO keepers would be well advised to spent their time and recourses to make improvements elsewhere.
-----
That is a a completely narcistocanibolizistic thing to say!





,,,,,,,,,,,thomas davis
