I am curious everyones opinions/theory's on Axanthics and why they are considered Axanthics? Is there a good explanation as to why they are considered Axanthic?
The Definition in the Barkers Ball Python Book, they give this definition for the term "Anerytheristic"
Anerytheristic-
Having a lack of red pigment and all red markings (Mattison, 1991). A Mutation that can be caused by two seperate defective genes resulting in a lack of red and orange pigment; predominantly marked with greys but also black, brown, or yellow (McEachern, 1991). An apperance that is without red; an apperance usually assumed to be the result of reduced or absent erythophore pigment production in the skin.
Over on the Boa Forum there is a dissucion on Axanthics and Anerytheristics, so I thought I would ask here, Why are Axanthic Ball pythons Axanthics? To play devils advocate here, isn't it true that many Axanthics "Brown out" with age? which you would think would be caused by yellow pigmentation right? isn't it true that the Snow Balls tend to gain yellow pigmentation as they age, wouldn't that contradict the "axanthic" label?
Do you think that they could possibly be actually Anerytheristic instead of Axanthic? They seem to follow the same definition that the Boas use for thier Anerytheristics, The snows are the same as well.
Wouldn't a true axanthic not "brown out", wouldn't a true axanthic when used with an Albino to produce snows wouldn't the snows be pure white? It kind of seems that Axanthics might be actually Anerytheristics, but since Ball pythons don't exhibit any "Visual" Red coloration, they aren't thought of as such. Could red coloration be part of what makes them brown? and just as in Boas when that red coloration is take away it leaves black grey and white, but they still retain yellow and it gets more visual as they age?...what do you think?
I am bored, so I thought I would get a discussion going...

-----
Executive Reptiles
Amanda Kingsbury & David Kendrick
www.executivereptiles.com




