While I have read about the string measurement method for decades, I have never needed to use it on really large constrictors. All of the large pythons and anacondas that are currently in my collection are docile enough that they will stretch out straight on the floor, or along a wall, and can be measured with extreme accuracy. I have always wondered about the accuracy of this method and decided to test it on a large python.
This evening I used a metal tape to very accurately measure an albino burmese in my collection at 16 feet 8 inches. I put her back in her unit and then took a length of fairly thick cotton string and ran it along the spine, doing this very carefully to get an accurate measurement. I also did this with a few "S" curves in her body as an added test of the method. I made three completely separate measurements with the string. All three string measurements were between 16'11'' and 17'3'' with an average of 17 feet 1.5 inches. I was really surprised as this was much more accurate than I would have thought it could be on a python of this length. For pythons of this length, it shows an accuracy of within 2%. In other words, the string measurement times 0.98 will give the true length of the snake. Additionally, one important thing that you must do to maintain accuracy is when measuring the string you just ran along the snake, be extremely careful not to stretch it in any way when measuring it with the tape.
Kelly