Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here for Dragon Serpents
Click for ZooMed
Click here to visit Classifieds

PIJAC alert S-373 Sen. Nelson Python Ban

jscrick Feb 17, 2009 02:10 PM

Just got this from PIJAC. I knew about it, but didn't realize it was a proposed ban on ALL in the Genus Python. I believe that would include Ball Python's, unless they've changed the nomenclature recently. With Ball Pythons being nearly half the market, I don't see how that will ever fly. Maybe I'm wrong.
jsc

FLORIDA’S SENATOR NELSON PROPOSES CONGRESSIONAL BAN OF ALL PYTHONS UNDER THE LACEY ACT

The Issue

On February 3, 2009, US Senator Bill Nelson (D-Florida) introduced Senate Bill S. 373 to add the entire Python genera to the “injurious wildlife” list under the Lacey Act (Title 18 US Code Section 42(a)(1)). The Bill has been referred to the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Senator Nelson’s action was inspired by the publicity surrounding a feral population of Burmese pythons (Python molurus bivittatus) in the Everglades region of south Florida. His comments, which appeared in the February 3, 2009 Congressional Record, stated that Lacey Act listing was needed to “combat this deadly nonnative nuisance” by banning importation and interstate movement of every species of Pythons. He noted that “Pythons were first discovered in the Everglades in the mid-1990s, and now have a rapidly-growing breeding population within the boundary of Everglades National Park.” He went on to state that “climate range projections…show that pythons may soon expand their range to include much of the southern third of the United States…”

The Senator’s statement failed to acknowledge that the US Fish and Wildlife Service is currently overseeing a risk analysis to determine which species in the genera Python, Boa, and Eunectes, if any, warrant inclusion in a formal, science-based evaluation as delineated by the long-established Lacey Act “injurious wildlife” listing process. S. 373 circumvents the normal listing process which affords the public an opportunity to submit written comments on the Service’s findings.

See attached PetAlert for details.

PIJAC

1220 19th Street, NW, Ste 400

Washington, DC 20036

(202) 452-1525 - tel

(202) 293-4377 - fax

-----
"As hard as I've tried, just can't NOT do this"
John Crickmer

Replies (2)

natsamjosh Feb 17, 2009 08:17 PM

>>Just got this from PIJAC. I knew about it, but didn't realize it was a proposed ban on ALL in the Genus Python. I believe that would include Ball Python's, unless they've changed the nomenclature recently. With Ball Pythons being nearly half the market, I don't see how that will ever fly. Maybe I'm wrong.
>>jsc
>>

Well, the bill proponents are probably thinking that by including
the entire genus, worst case is that they will have to "compromise" by allowing the small species like balls and angolans. In that case, they will appear to be negotiating in good faith.

Just my speculation.

Thanks,
Ed

emysbreeder Feb 20, 2009 11:16 AM

Nelson is a real TV hound!LOVES face time on the tube!Will most likely be running for President.He is dumber than dirt and very powerfull.If your a Dem.be sure to let him know you will not vote for him any more.If your a Rep.call your guy and get him on OUR side if he/she wants OUR vote.Maybe get a t-shirt that says "We own Pythons and we VOTE" This and the Fed HR669 can take us all out.I'm a tortoise breeder but I know what holds the industry together PYTHONS !Without them the Expos will fail.Vic Morgan .......pic DONT GET...

Site Tools