>>We had a good post about this before. It's just like the misuse of the term Ghost in the ball python market. They call them ghost but they are hypos. In the last couple of years many breeders are posting ghost/hypo. Slowly correcting the misuse of the term that started when the first ones popped out.
>>We should do the same. If it's a T-positive, call it that. Educate the newbies and buyers when selling your T-positives and let them know that while the trade name has been Hypo, it is really a T-positive.
>>What I find really interesting about the snake in the post is that the breeders seem to be carrying both genes, T-pos. and T-neg. The other possibility is a Paradox.
So, who has actually checked these snakes for where the biochemical pathway has actually been broken? I mean, if you people are so positive it is T , then someone must have confirmed that, right?
THE POINT is that people are so positive you can see chemical pathways with their bare eyes (mine aren't that good), that they say "YOUR name is wrong, but mine is RIGHT" based on nothing more than what you THINK something should look like when matched up with a specific name. It's downright funny. There is NO REAL EVIDENCE than T is a more accurate description of the morph than hypo....other than a subjective idea that it is what some people THINK it should look like without any proof to back up that thought. Funny.
With that said, it is what people call Hypo.....but looks more like what a T morph might look like....but the actual cause is unknown. I prefer hypo since it is the original name. Confusion comes in when names are changed. Who cares if it is a hypo or not (since T isn't confirmed, anyway) if everyone KNOWS what you mean when you say "hypo." That, after all, is the purpose of communication.
-----
KJUN Snakehaven
Pituophis.net
KJUN.us
Snakemorphs.us